Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #568137

Re: Mourning Einsteinians

From "hanson" <hanson@quick.net>
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: Mourning Einsteinians
Date 2016-04-05 15:44 -0700
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <ne1evq$9re$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <901cd878-e39d-48fc-9f63-b7530af555eb@googlegroups.com> <b378b8c8-d770-4c30-b481-8b3f53f44889@googlegroups.com> <FqednTOEXIxtmpnKnZ2dnUU7-VednZ2d@giganews.com> <ne184e$f4h$1@dont-email.me> <3f51d387-e438-449a-88df-7d8db5f007cf@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


"Double-A" <double-a3@hush.com> the "Alcoholic Addict"
aka/or/& "Anon E. Mouse" <nobody@home.invalid> are
submissives who are presenting  themselves under
their idol Glazier in their Yiddisher street corner act
<http://pbs.twimg.com/media/A8MGOU-CQAEaZw4.jpg>
after which they wrote:
>
 hanson wrote:
>> "Sam Wormley" <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Pentcho Valev wrote:
>> >> It [special relativity] revealed that there's no such thing as 
>> >> objective
>> >> simultaneity.
>> >
>> "Sam Wormley" wrote:
>> >   Duh. Relativity of Simultaneity
>> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relativity_of_simultaneity
>> >
>> >> In physics, the relativity of simultaneity is the concept that
>> >> distant simultaneity - whether two spatially separated events occur
>> >> at the same time - is not absolute, but depends on the observer's
>> >> reference frame.
>> >
>> hanson wrote:
>> "not absolute, but" Duh!... ahahahaha... So Sam, you admit then
>> that all this Hooplah over your proselytizing for Einstein's relativity
>> is iffy... that it is essentially a Theo-physic, a Faith endeaver that
>> is just like any the 3 cults of Abrahamic religions which require
>> Belief too... Duh!.... ahahahaha...
>> >
>> So Sam, whenever you proselytized for SR/GR do include that
>> single post of yours which shows that there is still some glimmer
>> of rationality left in your ever dimming albeo, which was when you
>> posted  <http://tinyurl.com/Tears-for-Einsteins-Misery>
>>
the "Alcoholic Addict" wrote:
> Just Jewish physics, eh hanson?
>
hanson wrote:
Duh!... of course, you are right for a change. That sad chapter in
the history of physics is over now, and only still supported by
the vestiges of geriatric kikes who have whored down Physics
and the US at large.
Many luminaries, including rational US Jews spoke out against
it like:
>
||| Edward Teller, the inventor of the H-Bomb, who says:
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vwiayZ3sH7U >
||| "Einstein didn't know what he was talking about..."
||| "...or he was lying, or both".
>
||| Prof. Carver A. Mead of Caltech (a student of Feynman),
||| "It is my firm belief that the 20th century will be
|||characterized in history as the dark ages of physics."
>
||| or F.A Hayek, Nobel laureate, who said: "In the future,
||| Humanity will see in our Epoch an Era of superstition, all
||| associated with the names of Marx, Freud and Einstein"
>
||| or John Beckman, an astronomy professor & Einstein disciple:
||| "The theory of relativity lives on. Is it a true picture of reality?
||| That is probably more a matter of FAITH than of proof."

 

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Mourning Einsteinians Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-05 01:09 -0700
  Re: Mourning Einsteinians Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 11:28 -0500
  Re: Mourning Einsteinians Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-05 11:00 -0700
    Re: Mourning Einsteinians Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 13:46 -0500
      Re: Mourning Einsteinians "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-04-05 13:47 -0700
        Re: Mourning Einsteinians Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-04-05 15:03 -0700
          Re: Mourning Einsteinians "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-04-05 15:44 -0700

csiph-web