Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | "wolfgang kern" <nowhere@never.at> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.lang.asm, alt.os.development |
| Subject | Re: The Virtual Partition - say goodbye to FAT12 |
| Date | 2016-04-05 22:19 +0200 |
| Organization | KESYS-development |
| Message-ID | <ne175o$1bc7$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <ndk667$vv8$1@gioia.aioe.org> <ndl7fn$82d$1@gioia.aioe.org> <ndlkec$td5$1@gioia.aioe.org> <ndt9d6$mjd$1@gioia.aioe.org> <ne15em$17vu$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Hello Mike, >> What's wrong by using FAT16 instead of FAT12 for small >> systems ? > Hi wolfgang, > What's "wrong" with using FAT12 for small systems? Me too see FAT12 as a weird historical requirement, I meant that FAT16 could replace FAT12 with lesser overhead. > The Virtual Partition enables the use of the exact same > simple FAT12 driver for an unmodified fully compliant FAT32 > volume. What's wrong with that? Yeah, you haven't said it before. So most of us are still in doubt what your FAT32-modifaction was all about... Meanwile a few of us older AOD's may have got your idea :) > The only difference in the driver is that the FAT table > entries are 32 bit instead of 12 bit. As a bonus, the 32 bit > entries are easier to handle than the odd sized (not a > native CPU word size) 12 bit which can also cross a sector > boundary for added complications. Of course, a full blown > FAT32 driver is expected to process the entries as the > actual 28 bit that it is and maintain the top 4 (reserved) > bits. It's way past the need to be concerned about the > mature FAT32 file system anymore (and even if the bits are > used - say by a file utility) the hobbyist system can safely > ignore them. Of course, handling them correctly is only a > minor thing anyway. Some other small nit picks that would > make the drivers different such as having the directory > entry for the file start cluster in two parts in two > different places is also easily ignored (and just as easily > handled) since the size of the Virtual Partition - even when > 8MB would have a max cluster number of only 16K which easily > fits in the original 16 bit entry anyway. After all, you could have just said that you only made the FAT-32 root directory a fix-size like old FAT12/16 instead of dynamic. so why that many posts and distracting words for a single matter :) __ wolfgang
Back to alt.lang.asm | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
The Virtual Partition - say goodbye to FAT12 "Mike Gonta" <mikegonta@gmail.com> - 2016-03-31 17:51 -0400
Re: The Virtual Partition - say goodbye to FAT12 Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-31 20:48 -0500
Re: The Virtual Partition - say goodbye to FAT12 "Mike Gonta" <mikegonta@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 06:50 -0400
Re: The Virtual Partition - say goodbye to FAT12 Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-01 11:06 -0500
Re: The Virtual Partition - say goodbye to FAT12 "Mike Gonta" <mikegonta@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 13:45 -0400
Re: The Virtual Partition - say goodbye to FAT12 Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-01 17:06 -0500
Re: The Virtual Partition - say goodbye to FAT12 James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 23:16 +0100
Re: The Virtual Partition - say goodbye to FAT12 Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-01 17:29 -0500
Re: The Virtual Partition - say goodbye to FAT12 Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-04-01 20:24 -0400
Re: The Virtual Partition - say goodbye to FAT12 Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-02 00:10 -0500
Re: The Virtual Partition - say goodbye to FAT12 Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-04-02 12:03 -0400
Re: The Virtual Partition - say goodbye to FAT12 "Mike Gonta" <mikegonta@gmail.com> - 2016-04-02 20:19 -0400
Re: The Virtual Partition - say goodbye to FAT12 "Mike Gonta" <mikegonta@gmail.com> - 2016-04-02 20:08 -0400
Re: The Virtual Partition - say goodbye to FAT12 "Mike Gonta" <mikegonta@gmail.com> - 2016-04-02 20:02 -0400
Re: The Virtual Partition - say goodbye to FAT12 "Mike Gonta" <mikegonta@gmail.com> - 2016-04-02 19:55 -0400
Re: The Virtual Partition - say goodbye to FAT12 "Mike Gonta" <mikegonta@gmail.com> - 2016-04-02 19:30 -0400
Re: The Virtual Partition - say goodbye to FAT12 "Mike Gonta" <mikegonta@gmail.com> - 2016-04-02 18:55 -0400
Re: The Virtual Partition - say goodbye to FAT12 Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-04 00:40 -0500
Re: The Virtual Partition - say goodbye to FAT12 "wolfgang kern" <nowhere@never.at> - 2016-04-01 09:20 +0200
Re: The Virtual Partition - say goodbye to FAT12 "Mike Gonta" <mikegonta@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 07:01 -0400
Re: The Virtual Partition - say goodbye to FAT12 "wolfgang kern" <nowhere@never.at> - 2016-04-04 10:42 +0200
Re: The Virtual Partition - say goodbye to FAT12 "Mike Gonta" <mikegonta@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 15:58 -0400
Re: The Virtual Partition - say goodbye to FAT12 "wolfgang kern" <nowhere@never.at> - 2016-04-05 22:19 +0200
Re: The Virtual Partition - say goodbye to FAT12 "Mike Gonta" <mikegonta@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 18:24 -0400
Re: The Virtual Partition - say goodbye to FAT12 James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 09:55 +0100
Re: The Virtual Partition - say goodbye to FAT12 "Mike Gonta" <mikegonta@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 07:11 -0400
Re: The Virtual Partition - say goodbye to FAT12 Rod Pemberton <NoHaveNotOne@bcczxcfre.cmm> - 2016-04-01 20:24 -0400
Re: The Virtual Partition - say goodbye to FAT12 "Mike Gonta" <mikegonta@gmail.com> - 2016-04-02 21:30 -0400
csiph-web