Re: Why Do You Have Confidence That Math Is The Proper Language For Understanding Reality?

From	Sergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: Why Do You Have Confidence That Math Is The Proper Language For Understanding Reality?
Date	2016-04-03 20:13 -0500
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<ndsf4r$1gen$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	<w7KdnUqipoR9K2PLnZ2dnUU7-SudnZ2d@giganews.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 4/1/2016 12:58 PM, Sam Wormley wrote:
> Why Do You Have Confidence That Math Is The Proper Language For
> Understanding Reality?
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z7XKKYlFLjs
>
>
>> This video is part of World Science U, a new digital education
>> platform for teaching and learning science.
>
>
>

more BS, what you gonna use LATIN ??



go ask TRUMP to help you "understand reality" TV

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Why Do You Have Confidence That Math Is The Proper Language For Understanding Reality? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 12:58 -0500
  p.e.a noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 13:47 -0700
  Re: Why Do You Have Confidence That Math Is The Proper Language For Understanding Reality? edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-04-01 14:02 -0700
    Re: Why Do You Have Confidence That Math Is The Proper Language For Understanding Reality? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 16:20 -0500
    Re: Maths/Theories conflict, sometimes. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-01 23:15 +0000
      Re: Maths/Theories conflict, sometimes. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-02 01:49 +0000
        Re: If you can't measure it, is it still science ? ! "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 20:00 -0700
        Re: If you can't measure it, is it still science ? ! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-02 19:03 +0000
          Re: If you can't measure it, is it still science ? ! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-03 05:04 +0000
            Re: If you can't measure it, is it still science ? ! benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-03 02:01 -0400
            Re: Stephen Hawking disagrees with you, Michael Moroney. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-03 06:23 +0000
              Re: Stephen Hawking disagrees with you, Michael Moroney. xxein1@att.net - 2016-04-03 10:54 -0700
            Re: Stephen Hawking disagrees with you, Michael Moroney. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-04-03 14:05 -0700
              Re: Loop Quantum Gravity. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-04-05 14:07 -0700
      Re: Maths/Theories conflict, sometimes. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 22:31 -0400
  Re: Why Do You Have Confidence That Math Is The Proper Language For Understanding Reality? Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-04-01 17:33 -0400
    Re: Why Do You Have Confidence That Math Is The Proper Language For Understanding Reality? Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-04-02 12:26 -0400
      Re: Why Do You Have Confidence That Math Is The Proper Language For Understanding Reality? Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-04-04 08:54 -0400
  Re: Why Do You Have Confidence That Math Is The Proper Language For Understanding Reality? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-04-03 20:13 -0500

csiph-web