Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #380605

Re: Differences between LET and SR.

From	HGW <HGW@home.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: Differences between LET and SR.
Date	2016-04-01 20:15 +1100
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<ndle68$ij1$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	(12 earlier) <ndgukp$ti8$1@news.albasani.net> <ndhdre$roo$1@gioia.aioe.org> <ndjn8s$4b0$1@news.albasani.net> <ndk4c8$su7$1@gioia.aioe.org> <5452f8aa-c4b3-4fd7-bd29-4ea9a1298d11@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 01/04/16 15:28, pnalsing@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, March 31, 2016 at 2:21:18 PM UTC-7, HGW wrote:
>> On 01/04/16 04:37, Paul B. Andersen wrote:
>>> On 30.03.2016 22:44, HGW wrote:
>>>>
>>>> There can be no evidence that a speed cannot be frame dependent for the
>>>> obvious reason that the very definitions of 'speed' and 'frame' prohibit
>>>> such a possibility. Therefore light must be ballistic like everything
>>>> else.
>>>>
>>>> All experimental evidence supports that fact.
>>>
>>> OK, Ralph.
>>> Here is some of the vast amount of experimental evidence
>>> that support the invariance of the speed of light:
>
>>> https://paulba.no/paper/Kennedy_Thorndike.pdf
>>> https://paulba.no/paper/Babcock_Bergman.pdf
>>> https://paulba.no/paper/Alvager_et_al.pdf
>>> https://paulba.no/paper/Beckmann_Mandics.pdf
>>> https://paulba.no/paper/Filippas_Fox.pdf
>>> https://paulba.no/paper/Brecher.pdf
>>
>> ...Ah! the latest edition of Paul B. Andersen's famous fairy tales...
>
> Nice scientific response, Ralph, which only goes to show that you haven't any
> bullets left in your arsenal...

I have replied to Paul's silly list so many times already I can't see 
any point in doing it again, He simply cannot accept the truth. Not one 
of those experiments is believable. Even if any of it were true, it 
would simply confirm Lorentz's theory and the existence of an absolute 
frame.

>>> Now it's your turn.
>>> Please specify some of "all the experimental
>>> evidence" that support that the speed of light
>>> depend on the speed of the source.
>
> Of course, for you, this would be impossible. You have no such evidence...

variable star curves demonstrate quite convincingly that light moves at 
c wrt its source and at c+v relative to an observer. The fact that all 
TWLS measurements produce the same answer. The MMX, Sagnac....in fact 
every known experiment proves light speed is source dependent like 
everything else.
>

Thread

Re: Differences between LET and SR. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-23 20:45 -0700
  Re: Differences between LET and SR. HGW <hw@...> - 2016-03-24 19:57 +1100
    Re: Differences between LET and SR. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-24 05:50 -0700
      Re: Differences between LET and SR. HGW <hw@...> - 2016-03-25 08:00 +1100
        Re: Differences between LET and SR. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-24 15:41 -0700
          Re: Differences between LET and SR. HGW <HGW@home.com> - 2016-03-27 20:50 +1100
            Re: Differences between LET and SR. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-27 06:19 -0700
              Re: Differences between LET and SR. HGW <xxx@....> - 2016-03-28 09:14 +1100
                Re: Differences between LET and SR. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-27 20:54 -0700
                Re: Differences between LET and SR. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-28 04:38 +0000
                Re: Differences between LET and SR. HGW <xxx@....> - 2016-03-29 10:09 +1100
                Re: Differences between LET and SR. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-29 04:50 +0000
                Re: Differences between LET and SR. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-03-29 11:03 +0200
                Re: Differences between LET and SR. HGW <xxx@....> - 2016-03-30 09:12 +1100
                Re: Differences between LET and SR. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-03-30 08:55 -0500
                Re: Differences between LET and SR. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-30 09:22 -0500
                Re: Differences between LET and SR. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-03-30 18:24 +0200
                Re: Differences between LET and SR. HGW <hw@...> - 2016-03-31 07:44 +1100
                Re: Differences between LET and SR. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-03-31 19:37 +0200
                Re: Differences between LET and SR. HGW <hw@...> - 2016-04-01 08:21 +1100
                Re: Differences between LET and SR. pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-03-31 21:28 -0700
                Re: Differences between LET and SR. HGW <HGW@home.com> - 2016-04-01 20:15 +1100
                Re: Differences between LET and SR. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-01 05:12 -0700
                Re: Differences between LET and SR. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-04-01 18:59 +0200
                Re: Differences between LET and SR. Bimpy <pimp@pimp.com> - 2016-04-01 17:04 +0000
                Re: Differences between LET and SR. Bimpy <pimp@pimp.com> - 2016-04-01 17:07 +0000
                Re: Differences between LET and SR. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-01 10:11 -0700
                Re: Differences between LET and SR. Bimpy <pimp@pimp.com> - 2016-04-01 17:15 +0000
                Re: Differences between LET and SR. alsor@interia.pl - 2016-04-01 10:14 -0700
                Re: Differences between LET and SR. Bimpy <pimp@pimp.com> - 2016-04-01 17:22 +0000
                Re: Differences between LET and SR. HGW <xxx@....> - 2016-04-02 08:28 +1100
                Re: Differences between LET and SR. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 16:48 -0500
                Re: Differences between LET and SR. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-04-02 14:39 +0200
                Re: Differences between LET and SR. Bimpy <pimp@pimp.com> - 2016-04-02 13:05 +0000
                Re: Differences between LET and SR. HGW <xxx@....> - 2016-04-03 10:23 +1000
                Re: Differences between LET and SR. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-04-02 22:00 -0500
                Re: Differences between LET and SR. HGW <HGW@home.com> - 2016-04-03 21:23 +1000
                Re: Differences between LET and SR. kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-04-04 06:33 -0700
                Re: Differences between LET and SR. alsor@interia.pl - 2016-04-06 09:55 -0700
                Re: Differences between LET and SR. kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-04-07 07:44 -0700
                Re: Differences between LET and SR. alsor@interia.pl - 2016-04-08 13:01 -0700
                Re: Differences between LET and SR. mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-04-04 00:02 -0700
                Re: Differences between LET and SR. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-04-03 13:25 +0200
                Re: Differences between LET and SR. alsor@interia.pl - 2016-04-03 08:16 -0700
                Re: Differences between LET and SR. HGW <HGW@home.com> - 2016-04-04 03:47 +1000
                Re: Differences between LET and SR. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-04-04 19:36 +0200
                Re: Differences between LET and SR. HGW <xxx@....> - 2016-04-05 07:54 +1000
                Re: Differences between LET and SR. alsor@interia.pl - 2016-04-01 08:49 -0700
                Re: Differences between LET and SR. Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-03-29 11:57 -0500

csiph-web