Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #380507

Re: The Einstein Conspiracy...Part 1.

Show all headers | View raw

On 30.03.2016 00:05, HGW wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 15:55:14 +0200, "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no>
> wrote:
>
>> On 28.03.2016 00:13, HGW wrote:
>>>
>>> By the way, a similar argument applies to that asteroid that crashed into
>>> Russia about 12 hours before predicted.... Because they used c instead of c+v,
>>> they always underestimated its proximity.
>>>
>>> I was the only person in the world who predicted an unexpected event that day.
>>> Was I right? I even wagered the reputation of BaTh on it with Paul B. He still
>>> hasn't paid me for it.
>
> HAHAHHHAHHAHHAHHHA!!!!! Just listen to the ratpack howling!!!!!
>

So why did you have to snip 'the howling of the ratpack'?
Didn't you like the facts the ratpack howled?

>
> The fact that I predicted an unusual eventn the same day wont go away no matter
> how much you lot scream and yell.
> It happened just as I said it would.

The fact is that Ralph Malcom Rabbidge aka Henry Wilson
predicted that 2012 DA14 would hit the Earth around New York
half a day earlier than predicted by NASA, and no matter
of much he repeats the claim to have predicted 'an unusual event'
he never predicted anything else than that 2012 DA14 would
hit the Earth.

On 2/8/2013, Henry Wilson wrote:
| Asteroid 2012 DA14 is approaching Earth at about 0.00003c.
| If NASA has based its trajectory forecasts on c instead of c+v,
| they will have underestimated its current distance from Earth,
| in which case gravity will bring it much closer to Earth than
| expected.
|
| It might even hit the Earth.
|
| But don't panic folks....Einstein will save you. (:

On 2/8/2013, Henry Wilson wrote:
| They have only been watching it for a short time you clueless fool.
| They have only seen a small part of its orbit and have calculated
| the rest on the basis that its light comes to Earth at c and not c+v.
|
| I wouldn't be at all surprised if the thing hits Earth half a day
| early....around about New York.
|
| Learn some basic physics please before you utter even more of
| your crap here..

The fact is:
Here is the prediction of the orbit published
February 1, 2913
http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news177.html
  <<
    Asteroid 2012 DA14 will be closest to Earth on February 15,
    2013 at about 19:24 GMT (2:24 p.m. EST or 11:24 a.m. PST),
    when it will be at a distance of about 27,700 kilometers
    (17,200 miles) above the Earth's surface.
  >>

February 15, 2013 2012 DA14 passed the Earth:
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1303.0554v2
  <<
   February 15, 2013, at 19:26 UT. It passed at
   a distance of 27,700 km from the Earth’s surface
  >>

The distance was almost exactly as predicted, and
the time was only 2 minutes later than predicted.

Since we now know that NASA's prediction was spot on, while
according to Ralph Malcom Rabbidge it should have been wrong
by half a day and 27,000 km if the ballistic theory was correct,
we can only conclude that according to Ralph Malcom Rabbidge
the ballistic theory is wrong; DA14 falsifies the ballistic theory.

So:

>
> BaTh is victorious yet again.
>

:-D

-- 
Paul

https://paulba.no/

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: The Einstein Conspiracy...Part 1. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-24 15:11 +0000
  Re: The Einstein Conspiracy...Part 1. Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog <prokaryotic.caspase.homolog@gmail.com> - 2016-03-24 13:14 -0700
    Re: The Einstein Conspiracy...Part 1. HGW <hw@...> - 2016-03-25 08:59 +1100
      Re: The Einstein Conspiracy...Part 1. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-24 15:52 -0700
        Re: The Einstein Conspiracy...Part 1. HGW <hgw@...> - 2016-03-26 14:55 +1100
          Re: The Einstein Conspiracy...Part 1. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-26 07:19 -0700
            Re: The Einstein Conspiracy...Part 1. HGW <xxx@....> - 2016-03-27 10:16 +1100
              Re: The Einstein Conspiracy...Part 1. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-27 05:50 -0700
                Re: The Einstein Conspiracy...Part 1. HGW <xxx@....> - 2016-03-28 09:13 +1100
                Re: The Einstein Conspiracy...Part 1. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-27 20:51 -0700
                Re: The Einstein Conspiracy...Part 1. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-28 12:01 +0000
                Re: The Einstein Conspiracy...Part 1. HGW <xxx@....> - 2016-03-29 10:01 +1100
                Re: The Einstein Conspiracy...Part 1. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-03-29 12:03 +0200
                Re: The Einstein Conspiracy...Part 1. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-29 14:05 +0000
                Re: The Einstein Conspiracy...Part 1. Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-29 14:19 -0700
                Re: The Einstein Conspiracy...Part 1. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-03-28 15:55 +0200
                Re: The Einstein Conspiracy...Part 1. HGW <xxx@....> - 2016-03-29 10:07 +1100
                Re: The Einstein Conspiracy...Part 1. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-03-29 11:24 +0200
                Re: The Einstein Conspiracy...Part 1. HGW <xxx@....> - 2016-03-30 09:09 +1100
                Re: The Einstein Conspiracy...Part 1. David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-30 02:43 -0700
                Re: The Einstein Conspiracy...Part 1. HGW <hw@...> - 2016-03-30 20:50 +1100
                Re: The Einstein Conspiracy...Part 1. David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-30 03:15 -0700
                Re: The Einstein Conspiracy...Part 1. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-03-30 18:49 +0200
                Re: The Einstein Conspiracy...Part 1. HGW <hw@...> - 2016-03-31 07:29 +1100
                Re: The Einstein Conspiracy...Part 1. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-03-31 20:08 +0200
                Re: The Einstein Conspiracy...Part 1. HGW <xxx@....> - 2016-03-30 09:05 +1100
                Re: The Einstein Conspiracy...Part 1. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-03-30 19:12 +0200
                Re: The Einstein Conspiracy...Part 1. HGW <xxx@....> - 2016-04-02 08:19 +1100
                Re: The Einstein Conspiracy...Part 1. "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2016-04-02 15:24 +0200
                Re: The Einstein Conspiracy...Part 1. Bimpy <pimp@pimp.com> - 2016-04-02 13:29 +0000

csiph-web