Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #347610
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: Linux User Superiority |
| Date | 2016-03-26 11:39 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <nd6aa1$kok$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <nd4eph0oe6@news4.newsguy.com> |
On 3/25/2016 6:40 PM, Fabian Russell wrote: > GNU/Linux caters to the professional elite. It tries to cater to everyone. 19 of the Top 20 at www.distrowatch.com are click-n-drool installs that boot to a desktop (Arch being the exception). > If one is not a computer expert then one should keep away. "One" should probably keep away from Linux anyway, as a matter of principle, in protest of the hobby "developers" foisting their lame slopware on the world. http://i.imgur.com/EV0JEC8.png > Microsoft, in stark contrast, is the operating system for brain-dead > idiots. Witness the proof: > > In the Hindu, Buddhist, and other Oriental religions the "swastika" > symbol has an innocuous significance that extends back for > centuries. > > The "swastika" is given the Unicode position of U+534D, U+5350, and > several other positions as well. > > When the dumb-fuck Microsoft user assholes discovered these innocent > symbols in their digital alphabets there was a furor -- and > Microsoft predictably kissed all their asses. Unfortunately, the swastika hasn't been an innocent symbol for about 75 years, since the murderous Nazi Party gained control and unleashed their thugs on Germany. > Yep. This represents the "sophistication" of the average Microsoft > user. You represent the adolescent mentality and sexually-frustrated hostility of the average Linux user. > GNU/Linux Unicode fonts (or anything else) do not exclude or censor > based on the whims of ignoramuses. heh! Ever listened to these cola GuhNoo/Linux ignoramuses blather on about their killfiles? There's NOTHING they would like more than to censor us out of this stinkpit. > Fuck you to Microsoft and all Microsoft users and supporters. "I know ALL about MS Windows programming. In fact I am currently building a project management database for my current employer using MSFT tools." Labian hypocrite sellout and relentless whiner > GNU/Linux. The only choice for REAL men. A "REAL man" would be running something really fun to install, like OpenBSD. http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq4.html
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Linux User Superiority Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-03-25 22:40 +0000
Re: Linux User Superiority Nobody <nobody@nowhere.net> - 2016-03-25 18:47 -0400
Jesse Rehmer, please don't drop this post... Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-03-25 17:25 -0700
Re: Jesse Rehmer, please don't drop this post... "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-03-26 15:41 -0400
Jesse Rehmer, please don't drop this post... Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-03-25 17:26 -0700
Re: Linux User Superiority owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-03-26 03:01 +0000
Re: Linux User Superiority DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-03-26 11:39 -0400
Re: Linux User Superiority Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-03-26 18:20 +0000
Fabian Russell is a Pipsqueak! John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 14:26 -0700
Re: Linux User Superiority DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-03-26 23:32 -0400
Re: Linux User Superiority "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2016-03-27 09:04 -0400
Re: Linux User Superiority DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-03-27 11:46 -0400
Re: Linux User Superiority Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-03-27 13:33 +0000
Re: Linux User Superiority DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-03-27 11:18 -0400
Re: Linux User Superiority Nobody <nobody@nowhere.net> - 2016-03-27 11:21 -0400
Re: Linux User Superiority Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-03-27 13:43 +0000
Re: Linux User Superiority Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-03-27 09:42 -0400
Re: Linux User Superiority owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-03-26 18:55 +0000
Re: Linux User Superiority Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-03-26 19:21 +0000
Re: Linux User Superiority owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-03-26 19:45 +0000
Re: Linux User Superiority Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-03-26 13:46 -0700
Re: Linux User Superiority Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-03-26 22:28 +0100
Re: Linux User Superiority Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-03-26 20:51 -0700
Re: Linux User Superiority Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-03-27 09:33 +0200
Re: Linux User Superiority Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-03-27 14:58 -0700
Re: Linux User Superiority Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-03-29 19:57 +0200
Re: Linux User Superiority Somebody <somebody@nowhere.net> - 2016-03-29 14:06 -0400
Re: Linux User Superiority Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-03-29 22:05 +0200
Re: Linux User Superiority ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-03-29 20:37 +0000
Re: Linux User Superiority Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-03-29 14:00 -0700
Re: Linux User Superiority Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-03-29 13:58 -0700
Re: Linux User Superiority Crusher <crusher4rockpile@mail.com> - 2016-03-29 19:47 -0400
Re: Linux User Superiority chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-03-30 06:50 -0500
Re: Linux User Superiority Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-03-30 11:35 -0700
Re: Linux User Superiority Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-03-29 12:02 -0700
Re: Linux User Superiority owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-03-27 21:04 +0000
Re: Linux User Superiority DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-03-27 17:16 -0400
Re: Linux User Superiority Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-03-27 15:00 -0700
Re: Linux User Superiority DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-03-26 18:53 -0400
Re: Linux User Superiority owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-03-27 04:28 +0000
Re: Hitler.ORG benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 23:25 -0400
Re: Linux User Superiority Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-03-29 13:32 +0100
csiph-web