Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.folklore.computers > #161232

Re: enigma

From Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com>
Newsgroups alt.folklore.computers
Subject Re: enigma
Date 2016-03-19 12:31 -0500
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <nck27p$b88$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <dl0p3oFrjapU1@mid.individual.net> <slrnnenton.1sf.mausg@Smaus.org> <1065549657.480040936.045985.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> <5d9pebdhvhf05dj0r4b3pkvvmmh7mhgqk4@4ax.com> <slrnneqcbb.19l.mausg@Smaus.org>

Show all headers | View raw


On 3/19/2016 6:01 AM, mausg@mail.com wrote:
> On 2016-03-19, JimP <blue@cwahi.net> wrote:
>> On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 17:47:06 -0700, Peter Flass
>> <peter_flass@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> <mausg@mail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I am told that couples that work in GCHQ or with the NSA (really, same
>>>> place) aare forbidden to talk of their work, even at home
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> It would be pretty easy for the Jennings to bug their home, or today pick
>>> up their conversation with a parabolic mike.
>>
>> Decades ago when I was reading the Peopular Electronics mag, they
>> mentikoned that an infrared laser aimed at a window could be used to
>> hear a conversation in a building. It used the window as a microphone.
>
> I have read that the radiation used is both bad for the people inside
> th window, and the ones using the equipment.

You might be thinking of the microwave radiation used to power the 
"Great Seal" type bugs. I think that required a fairly powerful 
microwave beam. Though it seems like it would be safe for the spy so 
long as he kept away from the front of the antenna/waveguide and the 
equipment was well designed for safety (not a given in the USSR). 
OTOH, actually looking out the window at where the laser is might be 
dangerous to your eyesight (and looking at the reflected laser from 
the spy's viewpoint could do the same).

> Also, that most sensative windows haave long been treated for it.
> (triple glazed?)

That would probably help reduce the vibration transmitted to the 
outside window. Various window films on the outside glass might either 
absorb the laser or reflect it, either of which could make it less 
effective.

>
>>
>> Of course, there is the US Embassy in Moscow with a carved wooden
>> plaque 'from the Soviet children' which had a bug in it.
>
>

Back to alt.folklore.computers | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

enigma mausg@mail.com - 2016-03-17 13:46 +0000
  Re: enigma Stephen Wolstenholme <steve@easynn.com> - 2016-03-17 14:07 +0000
    Re: enigma philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2016-03-17 10:00 -0500
    Re: enigma mausg@mail.com - 2016-03-17 15:29 +0000
    Re: enigma Bob Eager <news0006@eager.cx> - 2016-03-17 22:23 +0000
      Re: enigma Jon Elson <elson@pico-systems.com> - 2016-03-17 21:12 -0500
      Re: enigma mausg@mail.com - 2016-03-18 12:39 +0000
        Re: enigma scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2016-03-18 13:15 +0000
          Re: enigma Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-03-18 13:30 +0000
            Re: enigma Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-03-18 15:39 +0000
        Re: enigma Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2016-03-18 08:26 -0600
          Re: enigma Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-03-18 18:26 +0000
          Re: enigma "Joe Morris" <j.c.morris@verizon.net> - 2016-03-18 19:00 -0400
            Re: enigma Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-03-18 17:19 -0700
              Re: enigma Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> - 2016-03-18 17:27 -0700
            Re: enigma Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-18 17:47 -0700
              Re: enigma JimP. <blue@cwahi.net> - 2016-03-18 20:04 -0500
                Re: enigma Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2016-03-18 21:28 -0600
            Re: enigma hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-03-19 11:14 -0700
              Re: enigma Stephen Wolstenholme <steve@easynn.com> - 2016-03-20 09:02 +0000
        Re: enigma Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-18 17:47 -0700
          Re: enigma JimP. <blue@cwahi.net> - 2016-03-18 20:06 -0500
            Re: enigma mausg@mail.com - 2016-03-19 11:01 +0000
              Re: enigma "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 10:06 -0400
                Re: enigma Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-03-19 16:17 +0100
                Re: enigma greymaus <mausg@mail.com> - 2016-03-19 17:45 +0000
                Re: enigma "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-19 14:00 -0400
                Re: enigma sidd@situ.com (sidd) - 2016-03-19 15:48 -0400
              Re: enigma Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-03-19 15:10 +0000
              Re: enigma Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-03-19 12:31 -0500
            Re: enigma Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-19 07:28 -0700
            Re: enigma cb@elaine.df.lth.se (Christian Brunschen) - 2016-03-19 18:05 +0000
              Re: enigma Jon Elson <jmelson@wustl.edu> - 2016-03-21 13:56 -0500
                Re: enigma Andy Burns <feb2017-usenet@adslpipe.co.uk> - 2016-03-21 19:47 +0000
  Re: enigma "capek@ieee.org <Peter Capek>" <peter.capek@gmail.com> - 2016-03-20 23:16 -0700
    Re: enigma Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2016-03-21 05:55 -0700
      Re: enigma JimP. <blue@cwahi.net> - 2016-03-21 12:07 -0500
        Re: enigma Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-03-21 13:51 -0700

csiph-web