Groups > alt.atheism > #2070880

Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You

From	Smiler <smiler@jo.king>
Newsgroups	alt.atheism, alt.talk.creationism, alt.religion.christian
Subject	Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You
Date	2016-03-06 19:20 +0000
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<nbhvu3$165a$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	(6 earlier) <56Dllilkl63CD4.5Fluiluilui@7sinai.74> <fv4fdb19j2hbdkofhme9k2ri7uhilrr0e6@4ax.com> <56DB8mghmghmmg467.67E@mhmhmhjmhmh.com> <nsvndbdp7hlpo80fhikanaj4vohph4omqe@4ax.com> <56DC22BC.770@sinai.56>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On Sun, 06 Mar 2016 07:29:48 -0500, Moses wrote:

> Malte Runz wrote:
>> 
>>  Moses wrote:
>> 
>> >Malte Runz wrote:
>> >>
>> >>  Moses wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> This is exactly what you would expect to see after a
>> >> >> >> >> >> massive worldwide flood.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> Did it happen?      Oh yes!
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> > according to the Bereshith account, the flood was NOT a
>> >> >> >> >> > "natural disaster" and the only myth which should be
>> >> >> >> >> > debunked is the myth that the Bereshith account must be
>> >> >> >> >> > reconciled with a naturalistic mechanism.
>> >> >> >> >> > according to the Bereshith account God poured out waters
>> >> >> >> >> > and assuaged them, and this is not some natural
>> >> >> >> >> > catastophe upon which "God" merely sat and watched a
>> >> >> >> >> > thing that would have happened anyway without "God's"
>> >> >> >> >> > implementation.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> It [flood] was a physical impossibility.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >this speaks of an interference from some outside agency, and not
>> >> >> >a physical phenomenon that would have happened anyway if the
>> >> >> >outside agency had not taken action. calling it a "physical
>> >> >> >impossibilty" misses that point. Clearly, a God who can create
>> >> >> >physical universes from scratch can easily cover the surface of
>> >> >> >the earth with water. ...
>> >> >
>> >> >> And make it go away again. And erase all the evidence thereof.
>> >> >> Make it look like it never happened. That's one helluva God.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >i never said all evidence was erased ...
>> >
>> >> No, that was me. It's the only thing that could have happened, if
>> >> one insists that the Biblical Flood had taken place 4400 years ago,
>> >> because there is no evidence left.
>> >
>> >well, you don't have a snap shot photograph of exactly how the earth
>> >looked pre-flood to compare with how it looks post-flood.
>> 
>> We have very, very good ways of knowing what Earth has looked like over
>> the last few billion years. And one thing we can say, with absolute
>> certainty, is that there was no worldwide flood covering even the
>> tallest mountains in recent history. Those are facts, and you can go
>> all mumbo jumbo on my ass, nothing will change that.
> 
> all i see here are your assertions to the contrary.
> 
> we know it happened, my we is bigger than your we, we vote on it.

By that stupidity, when the majority of people believed the world was 
flat, it was flat.
When did it change to an oblate spheroid and why did nobody notice the 
change?

> you seem to be concerned with the height of teh mountains and the
> available water
> 
> but, you fail to recognize that the interfering God can pump the
> interior waters well up above the surface level

What interior waters would they be?
And that would be the god for which you have no evidence.
 
> you even provide a citation that speaks of loads of subterranean waters.
> 
> the interference pushed it up and rained it down, very slowly and
> controlled and later assuaged it away in a very controlled manner and
> there was no massive pile of mud strewn around, but, the water levels
> did change as you agree below.
> 
> gunna stamp your feet if we don't kow tow to your bald assertions?

What, like you do?

<snip>

-- 
Smiler, The godless one.
aa #2279
Gods are all tailored to order. They are made 
to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.

Thread

Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Moses <moses@sinai.55> - 2016-03-05 20:14 -0500
  Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-03-05 20:18 -0600
    Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2016-03-05 20:36 -0600
      Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-03-05 20:49 -0600
        Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 19:52 -0700
    Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Moses <moses@sinai.6y> - 2016-03-05 22:48 -0500
      Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-03-05 22:44 -0600
        Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Moses <moses@sinai.56> - 2016-03-05 23:48 -0500
          Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-03-05 23:38 -0600
            Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Moses <moses@sinai.56> - 2016-03-06 02:51 -0500
              Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-03-06 02:03 -0600
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Moses <moses@sinai.56> - 2016-03-06 03:25 -0500
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-03-06 09:45 -0600
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Moses <moses@sinai.54> - 2016-03-06 11:58 -0500
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-03-06 14:31 -0600
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Moses <noone@here.not-valid-address> - 2016-03-07 21:34 -0500
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-03-08 01:14 -0600
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Moses <noone@here.not-valid-address> - 2016-03-08 03:13 -0500
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-03-08 04:35 -0600
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Moses <noone@here.not-valid-address> - 2016-03-08 06:10 -0500
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Moses <noone@here.not-valid-address> - 2016-03-08 06:48 -0500
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Moses <noone@here.not-valid-address> - 2016-03-08 07:42 -0500
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-03-08 10:41 -0600
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-03-08 10:30 -0600
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-03-08 10:29 -0600
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Malte Runz <noyouare@notgetting.it> - 2016-03-09 01:12 +0100
                Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-03-08 19:18 -0600
              Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-03-06 18:00 -0600
      Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Moses <moses@sinai.56> - 2016-03-05 23:44 -0500
  Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Malte Runz <forget@it.nw> - 2016-03-06 12:01 +0100
    Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Moses <moses@sinai.56> - 2016-03-06 07:29 -0500
      Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-06 19:20 +0000
        Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-03-06 13:56 -0600
          Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2016-03-06 14:27 -0600
            Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-03-06 14:35 -0600
        Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Gordon <gordonlr@swbell.net> - 2016-03-06 14:33 -0600
          Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-03-06 14:47 -0600
          Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Smiler <smiler@jo.king> - 2016-03-07 20:23 +0000
      Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Malte Runz <noyouare@notgetting.it> - 2016-03-06 20:53 +0100
        Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-03-06 14:07 -0600
        Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Moses <noone@here.not-valid-address> - 2016-03-07 22:17 -0500
          Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-03-08 01:20 -0600
          Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-03-07 23:37 -0800
          Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Malte Runz <noyouare@notgetting.it> - 2016-03-08 23:15 +0100
            Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-03-08 16:56 -0600
      Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Cloud Hobbit <youngblood2949@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 17:22 -0800
        Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 18:25 -0700
    Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2016-03-06 05:07 -0800
      Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Malte Runz <noyouare@notgetting.it> - 2016-03-06 17:08 +0100
        Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-03-06 11:00 -0600
    Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2016-03-06 09:50 -0600
      Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Malte Runz <noyouare@notgetting.it> - 2016-03-06 23:01 +0100
        Re: Here's Some More Evidence For You Don Martin <drdonmartin@comcast.net> - 2016-03-07 18:30 -0500

csiph-web