Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #559790

Re: James McGinn why he is that way

From Sergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: James McGinn why he is that way
Date 2016-03-06 11:56 -0600
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <nbhr14$pld$5@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References (4 earlier) <9505c2aa-5b9f-44b9-8595-9114b9f295d6@googlegroups.com> <d135209c-9629-49cc-9c64-995c50b7c67a@googlegroups.com> <4e8990f0-5c60-4b1d-9d89-713f861c8766@googlegroups.com> <6020379b-3b72-4075-a4c0-a3a6007c3a6d@googlegroups.com> <ade91711-422c-43e2-b098-c85412b4851e@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On 3/5/2016 9:30 PM, Solving Tornadoes wrote:
> On Saturday, March 5, 2016 at 7:17:00 PM UTC-8, nu...@bid.nes wrote:
>
>>> So, uh . . uh, . . . er . . . uh . . . electrons aren't electricity?
>>
>>    Electrons are,
>
> Oki doki
>
>
>>    I asked you what *you* think electricity is.
>
> Electrons.
>
>>>>    Electricity can not "constantly flow in" from the sun to the Earth
>>>> because eventually the Earth would charge up so that other charges would
>>>> be repelled.
>>>

>>>  Moreover, being a physicist, I can precisely describe the mechanism
>>> underlying this behavior.

liar.  Answer the Question you evasive Twit !

>>
>>    Yet you can't state precisely the size or number of molecules of water per microdroplet.
>
> Nobody can.
>
>>
>>>   Are you interested in reading something on that?
>>
>>    Write away.
>

>>
  Answer the Question you evasive Twit !
>>>>
>>>>    It is exactly relevant
>>>
>>> Actually, it is irrelevant.
>>
>>    You wrote:
>>
>>>   I suppose you wackjobs think the boiling point of H2O is flexible.
>>
>>    I showed that it *is* flexible.
>
>>> IDK.  It's relevant.  Prove otherwise.
>>
>>    I did. The boiling point of water is flexible.
>
> Which is trivial unless you explain its relevance to the issue under discussion ?
>

why are you so pissed off ?  Just because you lost the discussion, 
doesn't mean you are smart.  It only proves you are anal-retentive.

Answer the Question you evasive Twit !

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

James McGinn why he is that way Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-29 14:56 -0600
  Re: James McGinn why he is that way James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 15:06 -0800
    Re: James McGinn why he is that way Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-01 09:22 -0600
      Re: James McGinn why he is that way HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-01 07:30 -0800
      Re: James McGinn why he is that way jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-01 18:52 +0000
  Re: James McGinn why he is that way "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-03-01 19:15 -0800
    Re: James McGinn why he is that way HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 07:17 -0800
      Re: James McGinn why he is that way john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 07:37 -0800
      Re: James McGinn why he is that way benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 10:50 -0500
        Re: James McGinn why he is that way HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 08:22 -0800
          Re: James McGinn why he is that way benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 16:45 -0500
            Re: James McGinn why he is that way HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 14:32 -0800
              Re: James McGinn why he is that way benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 20:02 -0500
                Re: James McGinn why he is that way HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 04:58 -0800
                Re: James McGinn why he is that way benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 13:30 -0500
                Re: James McGinn why he is that way HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 11:45 -0800
                Re: James McGinn why he is that way benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 15:00 -0500
    Re: James McGinn why he is that way James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 09:23 -0800
      Re: James McGinn why he is that way Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-02 11:37 -0600
        Re: James McGinn why he is that way James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 09:45 -0800
          Re: James McGinn why he is that way Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-02 12:17 -0600
            Re: James McGinn why he is that way James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 10:57 -0800
              Re: James McGinn why he is that way Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-02 13:14 -0600
                Re: James McGinn why he is that way James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 11:53 -0800
                Re: James McGinn why he is that way Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-02 14:08 -0600
                Re: James McGinn why he is that way James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 12:14 -0800
                Re: James McGinn why he is that way Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-02 14:29 -0600
                Re: James McGinn why he is that way James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 12:41 -0800
                Re: James McGinn why he is that way Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-02 16:14 -0600
                Re: James McGinn why he is that way James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 14:43 -0800
                Re: James McGinn why he is that way Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-02 20:14 -0600
                Re: James McGinn why he is that way jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-02 20:17 +0000
                Re: James McGinn why he is that way James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 12:42 -0800
                Re: James McGinn why he is that way jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-02 23:49 +0000
                Re: James McGinn why he is that way Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 16:06 -0800
                Re: James McGinn why he is that way jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-03 00:54 +0000
                Re: James McGinn why he is that way Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-07 09:16 -0600
      Re: James McGinn why he is that way Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 11:41 -0600
      Re: James McGinn why he is that way jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-02 17:53 +0000
        Re: James McGinn why he is that way James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 10:11 -0800
          Re: James McGinn why he is that way Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-02 12:19 -0600
          Re: James McGinn why he is that way jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-02 19:23 +0000
      Re: James McGinn why he is that way HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 11:28 -0800
        Re: James McGinn why he is that way benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 16:54 -0500
      Re: James McGinn why he is that way "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 18:36 -0800
        Re: James McGinn why he is that way Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 21:10 -0600
          Re: James McGinn why he is that way James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 19:59 -0800
            Re: James McGinn why he is that way jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-03 05:18 +0000
              Re: James McGinn why he is that way James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 21:56 -0800
                Re: James McGinn why he is that way jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-03 06:24 +0000
            Re: James McGinn why he is that way "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 19:49 -0800
              Re: James McGinn why he is that way James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 20:05 -0800
                Re: James McGinn why he is that way "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 19:05 -0800
                Re: James McGinn why he is that way Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 19:15 -0800
                Re: James McGinn why he is that way Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-06 07:31 -0600
        Re: James McGinn why he is that way James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 19:54 -0800
          Re: James McGinn why he is that way "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 19:45 -0800
            Re: James McGinn why he is that way James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 20:03 -0800
              Re: James McGinn why he is that way jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-05 06:47 +0000
                Re: James McGinn why he is that way James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 06:12 -0800
                Re: James McGinn why he is that way jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-05 18:51 +0000
                Re: James McGinn why he is that way James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 11:05 -0800
                Re: James McGinn why he is that way jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-05 19:22 +0000
                Re: James McGinn why he is that way James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 11:39 -0800
                Re: James McGinn why he is that way jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-05 22:08 +0000
                Re: James McGinn why he is that way James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 14:29 -0800
                Re: James McGinn why he is that way jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-05 22:46 +0000
                Re: James McGinn why he is that way edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-03-05 13:01 -0800
                Re: James McGinn why he is that way James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 13:50 -0800
                Re: James McGinn why he is that way Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 16:28 -0600
              Re: James McGinn why he is that way "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 19:16 -0800
                Re: James McGinn why he is that way Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 19:30 -0800
                Re: James McGinn why he is that way Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-06 11:56 -0600

csiph-web