Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #559243
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Hubble breaks cosmic distance record |
| Date | 2016-03-04 12:00 -0600 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <nbcif6$5mo$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <54fe5223-e9a4-4bb6-981d-20810f7eacc0@googlegroups.com> <nbceri$1tm6$1@gioia.aioe.org> <2beafd8f-a8c9-487d-be93-f9e7c90e5aad@googlegroups.com> <nbcg95$qa$1@gioia.aioe.org> <7d948393-806d-45a5-a247-7114d923b844@googlegroups.com> |
On 3/4/2016 11:49 AM, john wrote: > Why don't we compare 10 atheists' last words > with 10 theists' last words? > No cherry-picking- first 10 of each that list > according to an agreed formula? > > Let's do it, Odd!! > You're a scientist > Depends on who's compiling the list. If it's a list of atheists' last words compiled by a theist, don't you think that would be buying into some selection bias? Here's what a scientist would do: Collect the last words from a random sample of the population, with no information in the sample selection about whether they are theist or atheist. Categorize the last words of the sample. THEN pull the information about whether they are theist or atheist, and now see if there is a difference in the statements. But aside from the cluelessness you have about scientific studies, what makes you think that last words have any more inherent truth value than non-last words? Would someone uttering their last words have any particular reason to lie less? Would someone uttering their last words have any particular reason to reveal previously hidden information? If someone says something in their last words that is aspirational or reflects their hopes or even their firm beliefs, is there any reason to think that any of those thoughts represent truth? -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Hubble breaks cosmic distance record Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 20:20 -0600
Hubble breaks cosmic distance record jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-03-04 02:00 -0800
Hubble breaks cosmic distance record HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 03:32 -0800
Hubble breaks cosmic distance record jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-03-04 06:06 -0800
Hubble breaks cosmic distance record HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 06:27 -0800
Hubble breaks cosmic distance record john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 07:21 -0800
Re: Hubble breaks cosmic distance record Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 09:31 -0600
Re: Hubble breaks cosmic distance record john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 07:35 -0800
Re: Hubble breaks cosmic distance record HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 07:50 -0800
Re: Hubble breaks cosmic distance record john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 07:58 -0800
Re: Hubble breaks cosmic distance record john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 08:20 -0800
Re: Hubble breaks cosmic distance record HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 08:45 -0800
Re: Hubble breaks cosmic distance record benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 13:42 -0500
Re: Hubble breaks cosmic distance record Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 10:58 -0600
Re: Hubble breaks cosmic distance record john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 09:06 -0800
Re: Hubble breaks cosmic distance record HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 09:12 -0800
Re: Hubble breaks cosmic distance record Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 09:49 -0800
Re: Hubble breaks cosmic distance record HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 09:59 -0800
Re: Hubble breaks cosmic distance record Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 10:32 -0800
Re: Hubble breaks cosmic distance record benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 14:46 -0500
Re: Hubble breaks cosmic distance record benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 13:32 -0500
Re: Hubble breaks cosmic distance record benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 13:27 -0500
Re: Hubble breaks cosmic distance record Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 11:22 -0600
Re: Hubble breaks cosmic distance record HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 09:44 -0800
Re: Hubble breaks cosmic distance record benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 13:29 -0500
Re: Hubble breaks cosmic distance record john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 09:49 -0800
Re: Hubble breaks cosmic distance record HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 09:51 -0800
Re: Hubble breaks cosmic distance record benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 13:29 -0500
Re: Hubble breaks cosmic distance record Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 12:00 -0600
Re: Hubble breaks cosmic distance record john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 10:06 -0800
Re: Hubble breaks cosmic distance record Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 12:15 -0600
Re: Hubble breaks cosmic distance record HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 11:04 -0800
Re: Hubble breaks cosmic distance record benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 14:24 -0500
Re: Hubble breaks cosmic distance record Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 13:47 -0600
Re: Hubble breaks cosmic distance record benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 14:36 -0500
Re: Hubble breaks cosmic distance record moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-03-04 18:16 +0000
Re: Hubble breaks cosmic distance record benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 13:48 -0500
Re: Hubble breaks cosmic distance record HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 11:32 -0800
Re: Hubble breaks cosmic distance record benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 01:09 -0500
Re: Hubble breaks cosmic distance record john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 22:28 -0800
Re: Hubble breaks cosmic distance record HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 22:31 -0800
Re: Hubble breaks cosmic distance record benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 02:23 -0500
Re: Hubble breaks cosmic distance record HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 03:54 -0800
Re: Christianity's "God" is Ben Jacoby's pot. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 01:34 -0500
Re: Hubble breaks cosmic distance record Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 11:50 -0600
Re: Hubble breaks cosmic distance record "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 10:20 -0800
Re: Hubble breaks cosmic distance record Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-03-04 13:27 -0800
Re: Hubble breaks cosmic distance record john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 13:55 -0800
Re: Hubble breaks cosmic distance record Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 16:02 -0600
Re: Hubble breaks cosmic distance record john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 14:17 -0800
Re: Hubble breaks cosmic distance record Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 17:19 -0600
Re: Hubble breaks cosmic distance record Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-03-04 14:44 -0800
Re: Hubble breaks cosmic distance record benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 01:31 -0500
Re: Hubble breaks cosmic distance record jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-03-04 11:59 -0800
Re: Hubble breaks cosmic distance record jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-03-04 12:25 -0800
Re: Hubble breaks cosmic distance record Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 09:41 -0600
Re: Hubble breaks cosmic distance record Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-05 12:07 +0100
Hubble breaks cosmic distance record HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 07:45 -0800
Re: Hubble breaks cosmic distance record "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-03-04 10:50 -0800
Re: Hubble breaks cosmic distance record benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 14:42 -0500
Re: Hubble breaks cosmic distance record "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 14:38 -0800
Re: Hubble breaks cosmic distance record Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-04 17:01 -0600
csiph-web