Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #377817
| From | Helénē Swanhild <helenes@gardenclosure.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Mars mission-a grave problem |
| Date | 2016-03-03 20:39 +0000 |
| Organization | Odo Wilfried Institute |
| Message-ID | <nba7eg$5q6$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <ur2edb1cv95vnmttrifi8rt9bqlr1o5d5i@4ax.com> <AtWdnWzcWb0ZsUrLnZ2dnUU7_8zNnZ2d@giganews.com> <nb7j6l$1req$1@gioia.aioe.org> <p3qedb5ba667omeaof8161aijtpbh4ec2u@4ax.com> |
Jackpol11 wrote: >>Does not really matter those orbits and distances. Constant speed burns >>no fuel. This is how they got it to the Moon, allegedly of course. In >>any case, I must insist, constant speed in vacuum burns no fuel. hence >>those distances are totally irrelevant. > This is not about burning fuel; it's about the problem of staying there > for any length of time, which in this case can be staying there either > for several days, or else for more than 3.2 years. > The closest approach distance is about 60,000,000 miles; compare this > with 250,000 miles to the moon. it's 240 times farther than the moon. > 240 X! That could make for fuel problem There is a very nice animation > of Earth and Mars orbiting, without any orbital mechanics however. > www.windows2universe.org/mars/mars_orbit.html John Polasek The point I guess was, that it does not really matter, since speed is relative. The spaceship just needs to adapt its own speed to that planet it intends to land on. Is not different than the good Russian rockets and spaceships adapting their own speed to the International Space Station (which between us, is a de-facto Russian Space Station (RSS)). Same procedure. You leave Earth and adapt your speed correspondingly.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Mars mission-a grave problem Jackpol11@hotmail.com - 2016-03-02 11:40 -0500
Re: Mars mission-a grave problem paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 09:52 -0800
Re: Mars mission-a grave problem Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-03-02 12:10 -0600
Re: Mars mission-a grave problem Emigdio Sophronius <emigg@augustvisitors.org> - 2016-03-02 20:41 +0000
Re: Mars mission-a grave problem Jackpol11@hotmail.com - 2016-03-02 23:03 -0500
Re: Mars mission-a grave problem Helénē Swanhild <helenes@gardenclosure.org> - 2016-03-03 20:39 +0000
Re: Mars mission-a grave problem Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-03 22:57 +0100
csiph-web