Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #557870

Re: What do you think that indicates?

Show all headers | View raw

On 2/29/2016 10:30 AM, James McGinn wrote:
> On Monday, February 29, 2016 at 8:23:19 AM UTC-8, Sergio wrote:
>> On 2/29/2016 10:08 AM, James McGinn wrote:
>>> On Sunday, February 28, 2016 at 10:33:51 PM UTC-8,
>>> pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>
>>> I have no credentials whatsoever in this specific field of
>>> expertise
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> Don't sell yourself short, your dispute of my paper was no less
>>> substantive than was that of Saykally, and he's a Berkeley
>>> professor.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> Here are some links to my undisputed paper:
>>>>>
>>>>>

>>>>
>>>> J
>>> ust more of the same from you; not a single experiment, not a
>>> single calculation, no mathematical argument, no chemistry
>>> argument, nothing of substance whatsoever, just a large number of
>>> words, all of it raw speculation. SPECULATION!
>>>
>>> Right. I have a hypothesis.  Thus far nobody has any substantive
>>> dispute with it or with any of its substantive claims,
>>
>> you need to prove your hypothesis, it is your responcibility to
>> provide experiment experimental data, analysis of experimental
>> data calculations, mathematical arguments, chemistry argument,
>> evidence supporting conjecture
>>
>> right now you have nothing, zero, zip, nada.
>
> You have no substantive dispute with anything stated, yet you are
> foaming at the mouth angry that somebody has stated something that
> not everybody believes.

you believe in it, therefore => you prove it.

        how many times do we have to tell you ?

How can I, or anybody else, prove your imagination ?


>
> What do you think that indicates?
>

continued in-depth delusionalism on your part,

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

What do you think that indicates? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 08:08 -0800
  Re: What do you think that indicates? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-29 10:22 -0600
    Re: What do you think that indicates? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 08:30 -0800
      Re: What do you think that indicates? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-29 10:49 -0600
        Re: What do you think that indicates? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 10:18 -0800
          Re: What do you think that indicates? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-29 12:36 -0600
            Re: What do you think that indicates? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 10:58 -0800
              Re: What do you think that indicates? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-29 19:34 +0000
                Re: What do you think that indicates? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-29 23:34 -0800
  Re: What do you think that indicates? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-29 19:33 +0000

csiph-web