Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #556049

Re: Ligo: Tiny wiggles.

From Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info>
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: Ligo: Tiny wiggles.
Date 2016-02-23 23:45 +0000
Organization NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $23.95
Message-ID <naiqu81221m@news3.newsguy.com> (permalink)
References <yGQyy.2400$pL2.1174@fx40.iad> <nahhaf0234i@news4.newsguy.com> <nahprd$vl5$2@gioia.aioe.org> <naio2i030qv@news4.newsguy.com> <naiqf2$qi3$1@gioia.aioe.org>

Show all headers | View raw


On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 17:37:08 -0600, Odd Bodkin wrote:

> 
>  Do I get a prize?
>

The OP seems to claim that the minuteness of the GW effect renders
it insignificant.

But if the 10th decimal point, and more, of a physical constant is
considered highly significant then so too is the very small GW effect.

No.  You get nothing.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Ligo: Tiny wiggles. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-22 22:50 -0500
  Re: Ligo: Tiny wiggles. Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-02-23 11:54 +0000
    Re: Ligo: Tiny wiggles. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-23 09:12 -0500
    Re: Ligo: Tiny wiggles. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-23 08:20 -0600
      Re: Ligo: Tiny wiggles. Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-02-23 22:56 +0000
        Re: Ligo: Tiny wiggles. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-23 17:37 -0600
          Re: Ligo: Tiny wiggles. Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-02-23 23:45 +0000
    Re: Ligo: Tiny wiggles. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-23 07:09 -0800
      Re: Ligo: Tiny wiggles. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-23 09:26 -0600
    Re: Ligo: Tiny wiggles. "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-02-23 16:02 -0800
      Re: Ligo: Tiny wiggles. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-02-23 21:36 -0500
        Re: Ligo: Tiny wiggles. "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-02-24 11:55 -0800

csiph-web