Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #556033

Re: For meteorology author James McGill | Index of Refraction

From Sergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: For meteorology author James McGill | Index of Refraction
Date 2016-02-23 16:53 -0600
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <naintu$mo7$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References <c7qdncLnLO1NMVHLnZ2dnUU7-cednZ2d@giganews.com> <d429e2d6-118d-4d31-ac2d-5d5f71d33606@googlegroups.com> <QsedndTmz4eCUVHLnZ2dnUU7-X-dnZ2d@giganews.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On 2/23/2016 3:16 PM, Sam Wormley wrote:
> On 2/23/16 1:30 PM, James McGinn wrote:
>> On Tuesday, February 23, 2016 at 11:02:44 AM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote:
>>> For meteorology author James McGill | Index of Refraction
>>>
>>>     Water vapor (gas)  1.000261
>>>     Water (liquid)     1.333
>>>     Water Ice (solid)  1.31
>>
>> I'm not saying these are wrong, IDK.  But, if you assume without
>> verification you are a fool.
>>
>> The world is full of fools who produce scales without knowing that
>> water is tricky.
>>
>
>    Hmmm -- "water is tricky" sounds like TreBerT.
>

laundry dryers magically disappear liquid water out of clothes !

very tricky stuff indeed !

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

For meteorology author James McGill | Index of Refraction Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-23 13:02 -0600
  Re: For meteorology author James McGill | Index of Refraction James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-02-23 11:30 -0800
    Re: For meteorology author James McGill | Index of Refraction Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-23 15:16 -0600
      Re: For meteorology author James McGill | Index of Refraction Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-23 16:53 -0600
        Re: For meteorology author James McGill | Index of Refraction jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-24 00:54 +0000
  waves refract; refraction does not effect zero-dimensional rocktons (Newtonian b.s noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-23 17:05 -0800
    mister R. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-23 17:37 -0800

csiph-web