Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #376475

Re: Which, precisely, experiments confirm...

Show all headers | View raw

Użytkownik "Gary Harnagel"  napisał w wiadomości grup 
dyskusyjnych:31f55035-2cca-49ae-bf9e-9927ab9f9b7f@googlegroups.com...

On Wednesday, February 17, 2016 at 11:59:41 PM UTC-7, mlwo...@wp.pl wrote:
>
> W dniu czwartek, 18 lutego 2016 03:32:16 UTC+1 użytkownik Gary Harnagel 
> napisał:
> >
> > On Wednesday, February 17, 2016 at 4:23:36 AM UTC-7, mlwo...@wp.pl 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Well, does anyone of You care, when using these terms?
> > > No, thought not.
> >
> > Anyone with a brain can look them up in a scientific dictionary.
>
> Somehow, Sylvia didn't think about it, when
> asking me.

|That's because you don't use accepted definitions when spewing baloney.

A completely groundless lie, as expected from
relativistic trash.
>
> Fine, now define "state", "set forth", "meaning", "word and "phrase".

|Your "asking" that proves you are an idiot troll.


Rave, moron, and spit. What else can you do.

> > "2. to explain or identify the nature or essential qualities of; 
> > describe"
>
> Fine, now define "explain", "identify", "nature", "essential", "qualities"
> and "describe".

|Your "asking" that proves you are an idiot troll.

Rave, moron, and spit. What else can you do.

> > "3. to fix or lay down clearly and definitely; specify distinctly"
>
> Fine, now define "fix", "lay down", "clearly", "definitely",
> "specify" and "distinctly".

|Your "asking" that proves you are an idiot troll.

Rave, moron, and spit. What else can you do.

> > Your thoughts are proven to be rubbish.
>
> Rave, moron, and spit. What else can you do.
> So, which, precisely, experiment has confirmed
> that your idiotic concept of clocks is:
> -proper?
> -standard?
> -good?
> -real?

|Your "stating" that proves you are an idiot troll.
|So go pound sand up your butt until it fills that vacuum in your head.

Rave, moron, and spit. What else can you do. 

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Which, precisely, experiments confirm... mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-02-17 01:40 -0800
  Re: Which, precisely, experiments confirm... Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-02-17 22:20 +1100
    Re: Which, precisely, experiments confirm... mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-02-17 03:23 -0800
      Re: Which, precisely, experiments confirm... Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-17 18:32 -0800
        Re: Which, precisely, experiments confirm... mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-02-17 22:59 -0800
          Re: Which, precisely, experiments confirm... Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-18 06:02 -0800
            Re: Which, precisely, experiments confirm... Monique de Brabant <moniqb@cafedelmar.org> - 2016-02-18 15:32 +0000
              Re: Which, precisely, experiments confirm... paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 08:06 -0800
              Re: Which, precisely, experiments confirm... Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-02-19 11:26 +1100
                Re: Which, precisely, experiments confirm... mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-02-18 22:54 -0800
              Re: Which, precisely, experiments confirm... mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-02-18 23:10 -0800
            Re: Which, precisely, experiments confirm... Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-02-18 19:23 +0100
              Re: Which, precisely, experiments confirm... Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-18 11:34 -0800
                Re: Which, precisely, experiments confirm... Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-02-18 20:38 +0100

csiph-web