Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #343810

Interesting headline - "Whose side are they on?"

From	"Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject	Interesting headline - "Whose side are they on?"
Date	2016-02-17 08:56 -0500
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<na1u02$hod$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

Interesting headline -

    "Whose side are they on? Apple REFUSES court order to unlock dead 
Islamic terrorist's iPhone found after husband and wife's San Bernardino 
attack"

I'm all for privacy but I'm not a purist. Every law abiding citizen deserves 
privacy but there needs to be some threshold where the greater good should 
prevail. When you're an Islamic terrorist who killed a bunch of people in an 
attack then you've forfeited that right. Defining that threshold is a 
problem.

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Interesting headline - "Whose side are they on?" "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2016-02-17 08:56 -0500
  Putz! John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 06:01 -0800
  Re: Interesting headline - "Whose side are they on?" DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-02-17 09:27 -0500
    Re: Interesting headline - "Whose side are they on?" "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2016-02-17 09:46 -0500
      Re: Interesting headline - "Whose side are they on?" DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-02-21 12:39 -0500
    Re: Interesting headline - "Whose side are they on?" Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 08:55 -0600
    Re: Interesting headline - "Whose side are they on?" John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 13:28 -0800
      Re: Interesting headline - "Whose side are they on?" DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-02-17 20:37 -0500
  Re: Interesting headline - "Whose side are they on?" owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-02-17 19:22 +0000
    Re: Interesting headline - "Whose side are they on?" "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2016-02-17 16:09 -0500

csiph-web