Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.folklore.computers > #159568
| From | Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.folklore.computers |
| Subject | Re: Delay Line Memory |
| Date | 2016-02-17 04:17 +0000 |
| Organization | NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $23.95 |
| Message-ID | <na0s990oaf@news3.newsguy.com> (permalink) |
| References | <na03mr$ttc$1@dont-email.me> <a96bdf8d-4419-477d-a3d5-6eefc4772139@googlegroups.com> |
On 2016-02-17, hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com <hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com> wrote: > Question: when IBM introduced its PC, it had up to 640k of memory. > I think smaller amounts were available, with a cheaper price. Did > customers actually want to save a few bucks and go for the cheaper > and smaller PC? (To me, it seemed people couldn't wait for expanded > and extended memory to come out so the PC could get up to 1 meg and > even beyond, so it's hard to believe people would accept less than 640k.) Memory was expensive. Lots of IBM PCs and clones had 256K or less. (Why should they have more memory than the mainframe?) It's easy to forget how expensive things were back then. Around the time the IBM PC came out, I was doing a regular Friday pilgrimage to the local Heathkit store to spend $16 on another 2016 static RAM chip, building up my S-100 memory board 2K at a time. It was over 5 years after the introduction of the IBM PC that I laid out $700 for a 2MB memory expansion for my Amiga 1000. Then I had enough space to set up a bootable RAM disk so I could get some speed without spending the $2000 that a hard drive cost back then. -- /~\ cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid (Charlie Gibbs) \ / I'm really at ac.dekanfrus if you read it the right way. X Top-posted messages will probably be ignored. See RFC1855. / \ HTML will DEFINITELY be ignored. Join the ASCII ribbon campaign!
Back to alt.folklore.computers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Delay Line Memory "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2016-02-16 15:21 -0600
Re: Delay Line Memory Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-02-16 15:41 -0600
Re: Delay Line Memory David Wade <dave.g4ugm@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 22:18 +0000
Re: Delay Line Memory Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2016-02-16 17:36 -0500
Re: Delay Line Memory Lawrence Statton <lawrence@senguio.mx> - 2016-02-16 16:57 -0600
Re: Delay Line Memory bert <bert.hutchings@btinternet.com> - 2016-02-16 15:08 -0800
Re: Delay Line Memory Bob Eager <news0006@eager.cx> - 2016-02-17 01:31 +0000
Re: Delay Line Memory Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-02-17 03:42 +0000
Re: Delay Line Memory Morten Reistad <first@last.name.invalid> - 2016-02-17 00:25 +0100
Re: Delay Line Memory Elliott Roper <nospam@yrl.co.uk> - 2016-02-17 14:03 +0000
Re: Delay Line Memory Anonymous <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-17 00:14 +0000
Re: Delay Line Memory Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2016-02-17 11:46 -0800
Re: Delay Line Memory jhhaynes@earthlink.net - 2016-02-17 18:18 -0800
Re: Delay Line Memory David Wade <dave.g4ugm@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 09:44 +0000
Re: Delay Line Memory hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com - 2016-02-16 16:43 -0800
Re: Delay Line Memory Anonymous <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-17 01:24 +0000
Re: Delay Line Memory Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-16 18:52 -0700
Re: Delay Line Memory Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-02-16 22:19 -0500
Re: Delay Line Memory JimP <solosam90@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 11:34 -0600
Re: Delay Line Memory Dave Garland <dave.garland@wizinfo.com> - 2016-02-16 20:06 -0600
Re: Delay Line Memory Lawrence Statton <lawrence@senguio.mx> - 2016-02-16 20:23 -0600
Re: Delay Line Memory "hgww" <hgww@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 14:35 +1100
Re: Delay Line Memory Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-02-17 04:17 +0000
Re: Delay Line Memory "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2016-02-18 17:14 -0600
Re: Delay Line Memory Lawrence Statton <lawrence@senguio.mx> - 2016-02-18 19:27 -0600
Re: Delay Line Memory Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2016-02-19 04:14 +0000
Re: Delay Line Memory Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-02-19 19:07 -0500
Re: Delay Line Memory Bob Eager <news0006@eager.cx> - 2016-02-17 01:30 +0000
Re: Delay Line Memory "Joe Morris" <j.c.morris@verizon.net> - 2016-02-17 19:11 -0500
Re: Delay Line Memory Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-02-17 23:13 -0500
Re: Delay Line Memory Jon Elson <elson@pico-systems.com> - 2016-02-17 22:25 -0600
Re: Delay Line Memory isw <isw@witzend.com> - 2016-02-17 23:16 -0800
Re: Delay Line Memory Jon Elson <elson@pico-systems.com> - 2016-02-18 12:01 -0600
Re: Delay Line Memory Jon Elson <elson@pico-systems.com> - 2016-02-18 12:10 -0600
Re: Delay Line Memory Lawrence Statton <lawrence@senguio.mx> - 2016-02-18 13:46 -0600
Re: Delay Line Memory Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-02-19 19:13 -0500
Re: Delay Line Memory Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2016-02-18 04:49 -0800
Re: Delay Line Memory Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-02-19 19:21 -0500
Re: Delay Line Memory Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2016-02-18 04:51 -0800
Re: Delay Line Memory Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-02-19 19:16 -0500
Re: Delay Line Memory Peter Flass <peter_flass@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-16 18:52 -0700
Re: Delay Line Memory "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2016-02-19 20:50 -0600
Re: Delay Line Memory Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-02-20 06:31 +0000
Re: Delay Line Memory G. <gerry77@no.spam.mail.com> - 2016-02-17 04:08 +0100
Re: Delay Line Memory Stan Barr <plan.b@bluesomatic.org> - 2016-02-17 08:19 +0000
Re: Delay Line Memory Jon Elson <jmelson@wustl.edu> - 2016-02-17 14:57 -0600
Re: Delay Line Memory "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2016-02-19 20:43 -0600
Re: Delay Line Memory isw <isw@witzend.com> - 2016-02-19 22:13 -0800
Re: Delay Line Memory Stan Barr <plan.b@bluesomatic.org> - 2016-02-20 08:17 +0000
Re: Delay Line Memory Lawrence Statton <lawrence@senguio.mx> - 2016-02-20 09:17 -0600
Re: Delay Line Memory Lawrence Statton <lawrence@senguio.mx> - 2016-02-20 09:20 -0600
Re: Delay Line Memory Quadibloc <jsavard@ecn.ab.ca> - 2016-02-20 18:49 -0800
Re: Delay Line Memory isw <isw@witzend.com> - 2016-02-20 21:06 -0800
Re: Delay Line Memory jhhaynes@earthlink.net - 2016-02-17 18:23 -0800
Re: Delay Line Memory isw <isw@witzend.com> - 2016-02-17 23:06 -0800
csiph-web