Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #553704

Re: GRAVITY...

From "hanson" <hanson@quick.net>
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: GRAVITY...
Date 2016-02-16 16:39 -0800
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <na0fbl$8sf$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <56C38B72.A1E@ix.netcom.com> <msKdnTC6Wce8CV7LnZ2dnUU7-ImdnZ2d@giganews.com> <56C3A23C.EEE@ix.netcom.com> <J9udnfI_jvjCLF7LnZ2dnUU7-bsAAAAA@giganews.com> <3c604c9e-4900-479c-b642-778bd303f4ca@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


"Double-A" <double-a3@hush.com> wrote:
 
Sam Wormley wrote:
> The Starmaker aka kike Sternmacher wrote: ph...ttt!
>
Sam Wormley wrote:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy-momentum_relation
>>    E^2 = (mc^2)^2 + (pc)^2    ........ [1]
> 
Double-Alkie wrote:
> Wow!  This looks like it has the same units as Bert's G = Emc^2 !
> 
hanson wrote:
Besides [1] being an 80 years old pedestrian banality
that will never get a job for anyone these days, [1] is as
bad as Full-Swine Glazier's stolen and wrong G=EMC^2.
>
So, when you get sober write down the MTL unit equations
and see how you have denigrated the Physics establishment.
>
But you being a Sanders-Communist, that may be ok by you
Thanks for the laughs though...... ahahahahahanson  
> 
>

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 11:44 -0800
  Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 14:44 -0600
    Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 12:49 -0800
      Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 15:26 -0600
        Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 14:27 -0800
          Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 17:31 -0600
            Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 15:54 -0800
              Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 18:05 -0600
                Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 21:28 -0800
            Re: GRAVITY... Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-02-16 16:10 -0800
              Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 18:25 -0600
              Re: GRAVITY... "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-02-16 16:39 -0800
              Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 22:57 -0600
                Re: GRAVITY... "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-02-16 21:11 -0800
  Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-16 22:37 -0800
    Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-17 09:42 -0800
      Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 11:48 -0600
        Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-17 15:12 -0800
          /alfven, J. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 16:15 -0800
          Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 19:02 -0600
            gra-something noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 20:06 -0800
          Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-17 23:54 -0800
            Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 03:40 -0500
              Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-02-18 11:16 -0500
              Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-18 11:26 -0800
                Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 14:06 -0600
                Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-18 14:09 -0800
                Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 16:12 -0600
                Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-18 16:29 -0800
                Re: GRAVITY...has not been proven to be true. The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-19 12:06 -0800
          Re: GRAVITY... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-19 23:24 -0800
            Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 13:24 -0600
        Re: GRAVITY... "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 21:48 -0800
      Re: GRAVITY... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-17 11:55 -0600
        Re: GRAVITY... Monique de Brabant <moniqb@cafedelmar.org> - 2016-02-18 15:55 +0000
        Re: GRAVITY... HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 04:27 -0800

csiph-web