Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #375870

Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now?

Show all headers | View raw

On Tuesday, February 9, 2016 at 7:33:39 PM UTC, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> On 2/9/2016 1:11 PM, oriel36 wrote:

> >
> > The 'scientific method' isn't a method,
>
> Well, OK then, you don't like science, which is DEFINED as the activity
> that uses the scientific method. Again, I'll ask why you are posting to
> a newsgroup devoted to fans of science.

And shark is DEFINED as a 4 legs grass eating animal.
I've written this definition myself, so I'm sure.
And whoever doesn't believe that shark is as I defined it,
is  STUPID!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? jamesl51165@gmail.com - 2016-02-06 15:55 -0800
  Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-02-06 16:15 -0800
    Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? jamesl51165@gmail.com - 2016-02-06 16:33 -0800
      Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-02-06 22:43 -0800
    Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? erkdemon@gmail.com - 2016-02-07 19:53 -0800
      Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-02-07 21:57 -0800
      Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? oriel36 <kelleher.gerald@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 03:14 -0800
        Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 22:50 -0800
          Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? oriel36 <kelleher.gerald@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 23:41 -0800
            Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 00:28 -0800
              Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? oriel36 <kelleher.gerald@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 01:11 -0800
    Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 08:59 -0600
      Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? erkdemon@gmail.com - 2016-02-08 17:21 -0800
        Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? xxein1@att.net - 2016-02-11 15:06 -0800
          Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 20:02 -0800
            Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-02-12 20:10 -0800
              Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-02-13 23:55 -0800
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? jamesl51165@gmail.com - 2016-02-14 12:33 -0800
          Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? brightontoyandmodelmuseum@gmail.com - 2016-02-15 16:42 -0800
          Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-02-15 22:21 -0600
      Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-09 02:40 +0100
        Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 09:57 -0600
          Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? oriel36 <kelleher.gerald@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 08:44 -0800
            Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 11:27 -0600
              Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? oriel36 <kelleher.gerald@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 09:50 -0800
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 12:03 -0600
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? oriel36 <kelleher.gerald@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 11:11 -0800
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 13:33 -0600
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? oriel36 <kelleher.gerald@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 11:49 -0800
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-02-09 20:55 +0100
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 14:46 -0600
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? oriel36 <kelleher.gerald@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 13:51 -0800
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 17:03 -0600
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-02-09 20:19 -0800
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 21:42 -0800
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 22:17 -0800
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? oriel36 <kelleher.gerald@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 22:28 -0800
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 22:39 -0800
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-02-10 09:36 -0800
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? oriel36 <kelleher.gerald@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 09:59 -0800
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-02-10 10:29 -0800
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? oriel36 <kelleher.gerald@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 10:44 -0800
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? oriel36 <kelleher.gerald@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 22:52 -0800
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? oriel36 <kelleher.gerald@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 22:39 -0800
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 14:53 -0600
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? oriel36 <kelleher.gerald@gmail.com> - 2016-02-09 14:06 -0800
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 11:05 -0600
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? oriel36 <kelleher.gerald@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 09:25 -0800
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 20:11 -0800
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-02-10 21:05 -0800
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? oriel36 <kelleher.gerald@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 01:20 -0800
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-20 23:22 +0100
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? jamesl51165@gmail.com - 2016-02-20 14:42 -0800
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? brightontoyandmodelmuseum@gmail.com - 2016-02-26 15:26 -0800
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? erkdemon@gmail.com - 2016-02-26 15:32 -0800
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 19:29 -0800
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? Eric Baird <erkdemon@gmail.com> - 2016-02-27 21:14 -0800
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-02-27 21:51 -0800
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-02-09 19:04 +0100
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-09 10:30 -0800
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-02-09 19:31 +0100
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2016-02-09 10:38 -0800
                Re: If old physics is all wrong who is prepared to go on with new now? Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2016-02-09 20:57 +0100

csiph-web