Re: BJ vs Science

From	Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: BJ vs Science
Date	2016-02-04 12:22 -0600
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<n904sg$16ld$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	(7 earlier) <be5aeaca-e7c1-49d4-a594-9331328b224e@googlegroups.com> <n901a9$vk0$2@gioia.aioe.org> <75c97224-fb89-42aa-bc51-5a956e4d59db@googlegroups.com> <n903c4$1395$2@gioia.aioe.org> <0d24b098-9017-499c-bcbb-00edd667704b@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 2/4/2016 12:06 PM, john wrote:
> No, but that doesn't mean it couldn't happen
> and that we shouldn't spend billions
> trying to observe it, no matter how illogical.

Well, John, illogical is in the eye of the beholder, isn't it?
After all, you thought that two electrons being bound in the same helium 
atom if they repel each other is also illogical; when in fact, all that 
came out of that was that you had forgotten the two protons are there 
too, and that the attraction of two protons outweighs outweighs the 
repulsion of one other electron.

So..... illogical??? Or just you not thinking clearly about it?

And as to how much money should be spent on something you don't think 
clearly about .... you've never answered the question how much money you 
think is the maximum that should be spent on such things. All you say is 
"too much, too much" but you don't ever seem to have a line you can 
point to.

> Yes- that's your argument

-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Thread

BJ vs Science HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 03:43 -0800
  BJ vs Science john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 06:02 -0800
    BJ vs Science HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 06:34 -0800
      BJ vs Science john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 06:44 -0800
        BJ vs Science HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 07:58 -0800
          BJ vs Science john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 08:26 -0800
            BJ vs Science HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 08:30 -0800
              BJ vs Science john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 08:43 -0800
                BJ vs Science HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 09:09 -0800
                Re: BJ vs Science Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 11:21 -0600
                Re: BJ vs Science john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 09:36 -0800
                Re: BJ vs Science Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 11:56 -0600
                Re: BJ vs Science john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 10:06 -0800
                Re: BJ vs Science Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 12:22 -0600
                Re: BJ vs Science benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 20:13 -0500
                Re: BJ vs Science Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 07:03 -0600
                Re: BJ vs Science john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 06:25 -0800
                Re: BJ vs Science Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 08:51 -0600
                Re: BJ vs Science john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 08:19 -0800
                Re: BJ vs Science Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 13:48 -0600
                Re: BJ vs Science benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-02-06 00:56 -0500
                Re: BJ vs Science john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-06 03:19 -0800
                Re: BJ vs Science benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 11:09 -0500
                Re: BJ vs Science john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 08:32 -0800
                Re: BJ vs Science HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 09:01 -0800
                Re: BJ vs Science john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 09:10 -0800
                Re: BJ vs Science HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 10:00 -0800
                Re: BJ vs Science Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 10:07 -0800
                Re: BJ vs Science john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 10:53 -0800
                Re: BJ vs Science Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 11:07 -0800
                Re: BJ vs Science benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-02-06 00:15 -0500
                Re: BJ vs Science benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-02-06 00:11 -0500
                Re: BJ vs Science benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-02-06 00:08 -0500
                Re: BJ vs Science benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-02-06 00:07 -0500
                Re: BJ vs Science benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-02-06 00:06 -0500
                Re: BJ vs Science HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 07:48 -0800
                Re: BJ vs Science benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 23:47 -0500
                Re: BJ vs Science benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 11:08 -0500

csiph-web