Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #550233

Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT)

Show all headers | View raw

On 2/3/2016 7:54 AM, kenseto wrote:
> On Monday, February 1, 2016 at 6:23:42 PM UTC-5, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>> On 2/1/2016 3:36 PM, kenseto wrote:
>>> On Sunday, January 31, 2016 at 8:28:45 PM UTC-5, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>>> On 1/31/2016 10:26 AM, kenseto wrote:
>>>>> IRT is a new theory of relativity. It includes  LET and SRT as subsets. It has an
>>>>> unlimited domain of applicability. Therefore it is suitable for use to replace
>>>>> SRT/GRT in all applications. A paper on IRT is available in the following link:
>>>>> http://www.modelmechanics.org/2015irt.pdf
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> At this point I just want to say how amused I am that you seriously
>>>> think that the math of quantum electrodynamics can be explained
>>>> alternately with an explanation involving angels.
>>>
>>> 1. Angel explanation is designed to make fun of the virtual particle/field explanation of the QED math.
>>
>> Didn't seem to make fun of anyone but you.
>
> I pointed out that field/virtual particles can be replaced by the concept of  angels....in fact that
> concept of angel has an unlimited domain of applicability
> So it is a better model than the field/virtual particle model.

And this is what is highly amusing about you and your ideas. You have 
absolutely zero idea what science is or how it works. Geez what a 
pretentious loon.

> Model Mechanics is at par with the angel model. Why? Because Model Mechanics also has an unlimited
> domain of applicability, including gravity.
>
>>> 2. Model Mechanics explanation of the QED math: directions of Absolute motions of the interacting
>>> particles (or objects) in the E-Matrix give rise to the attractive or repulsive forces and the electric
>>> charge of a particle is not the intrinsic properties of the particle. This avoids the infinity problem of QED.
>>
>> And does no better a job of connecting to QED math than the angels
>> explanation.
>
> Model Mechanics connects to the QED math completely. In addition, Model mechanics leads to a new theory of
> gravity and therefore it is a better model than field/virtual particles.
>


-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-01-31 08:26 -0800
  Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) olli.dp3@gmail.com - 2016-01-31 09:50 -0800
    Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-02-01 14:56 -0800
  Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 19:28 -0600
    Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-02-01 13:36 -0800
      Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-01 17:23 -0600
        Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-02-03 05:54 -0800
          Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 10:36 -0600
  Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-01 18:01 -0600
    Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-02-03 05:34 -0800
      Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 07:45 -0600
      Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) shan <shan@enterapps.org> - 2016-02-03 17:17 +0000
  Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-01 18:18 -0600
    Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-02-03 05:41 -0800
      Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 07:48 -0600
        Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-02-03 07:29 -0800
          Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 13:58 -0600
            Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-02-05 07:16 -0800
              Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 09:34 -0600
                Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-02-05 13:35 -0800
                Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 16:14 -0600
                Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-02-06 05:13 -0800
                Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) shan <shan@enterapps.org> - 2016-02-06 13:42 +0000
                Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-06 08:08 -0600
                Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-02-06 10:39 -0800
                Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-06 12:43 -0600
                Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 09:18 -0600
                Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 09:05 -0600
              Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 09:36 -0600
                Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-02-05 13:37 -0800
  Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 19:27 -0800
    Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 00:19 -0500
    Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-02-05 07:34 -0800
  Re: Improved Relativity Theory (IRT) Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 08:26 -0600

csiph-web