Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #549285
| From | Polikwaptiwa <polikw@polikwamail.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Statisticians Probe Tree Ring Climate Data |
| Date | 2016-01-30 00:52 +0000 |
| Organization | ÉTAÍN |
| Message-ID | <n8h1gl$pt6$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <vL6dnbVvuN1-6DbLnZ2dnUU7-UOdnZ2d@giganews.com> <slqsnc-ss1.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
jimp wrote: >>> Uncertainties in tree-ring-based climate reconstructions probed. >>> Results suggest that there is less certainty than implied by a >>> reconstruction developed using any one set of assumptions > > Bottom line is it is all speculative and unprovable guesswork. Tree-rings in our forests are not going farther than a few hundreds years in total. The very old one are not dissected.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Statisticians Probe Tree Ring Climate Data Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 08:23 -0600
Re: Statisticians Probe Tree Ring Climate Data jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-29 19:21 +0000
Re: Statisticians Probe Tree Ring Climate Data Polikwaptiwa <polikw@polikwamail.org> - 2016-01-30 00:52 +0000
Re: Statisticians Probe Tree Ring Climate Data Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-29 14:52 -0600
Re: Statisticians Probe Tree Ring Climate Data 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-01-31 20:59 +0000
csiph-web