Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.os.linux.ubuntu > #186604

Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer

From philo <philo@privacy.net>
Newsgroups alt.os.linux.ubuntu
Subject Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer
Date 2016-01-25 04:33 -0600
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <n84tgk$bf8$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (4 earlier) <n8382e$29l$1@dont-email.me> <n83a3q$c8c$1@dont-email.me> <n83sb4$fcb$1@dont-email.me> <n83t84$jmh$1@dont-email.me> <n84mva$hor$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

On 01/25/2016 02:39 AM, Edmund wrote:
> O
>>>
>>> That is hardly a workable solution for most of us, there are about a
>>> zillion linux releases and each version has a handful of incompatible
>>> desktop environments and most people only live 80 years or so.
>>> That is not enough time to try them all and the number of linux
>>> releases grow as we speak.
>>> THATS the way linux works, they don't fix bugs the keep coming with new
>>> releases with often exactly the same and a couple of new bugs.
>>>
>>> ALL file browsers I tried fail in one way or another and sometimes
>>> both.
>>> Unfortunately that is how it is.
>>>
>>> Edmund
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I had a problem, I found a simple solution and I move on.
>
> Your solution is as you told us - not using an option - that isn't a
> solution its a workaround at best.
>>
>> Don't have the time to dwell on "what should be".
>>
>> Too busy to worry about it.
>
> Thats what I do, find something that is workable and go on but that
> doesn't make me blind for those shortcomings.
> Your remark that Nautilus is around for 15 years so it not likely going
> to get fixed, is spot on. I tried before I made bug reports more then 10
> years ago, there are others confirming the same, do you think it is fixed
> even now? Nope,! but we have 25 or so more linux releases :-)
>   Yes I know failing packages, missing repositories "has nothing to do"
> with the zillion linux releases, never mind that IF there was only ONE
> linux release with perfectly working software nobody in his right mind
> would want another 200 releases with none working software.
>
> Edmund
>
>
>
Bottom line: Linux is free and huge portions of it work better than the 
"paid for" operating systems....so if one small portion is not quite 
right...who am I to complain?

Back to alt.os.linux.ubuntu | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

GUI "crash" philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2016-01-22 05:47 -0600
  Re: GUI "crash" "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 09:17 -0500
    Re: GUI "crash" philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2016-01-22 08:27 -0600
      Re: GUI "crash" "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 10:53 -0500
        Re: GUI "crash" philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2016-01-22 10:18 -0600
    Re: GUI "crash" Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-01-22 07:19 -0800
      Re: GUI "crash" "Dirk T. Verbeek" <dverbeek@xs4all.nl> - 2016-01-22 16:52 +0100
      Re: GUI "crash" "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 10:57 -0500
        Re: GUI "crash" philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2016-01-22 10:25 -0600
      Re: GUI "crash" philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2016-01-22 10:24 -0600
  Re: GUI "crash" Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> - 2016-01-22 15:30 +0000
    Re: GUI "crash" "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 11:02 -0500
      Re: GUI "crash" Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be.invalid> - 2016-01-22 17:22 +0100
        Re: GUI "crash" DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2016-01-22 11:32 -0500
          Re: GUI "crash" "Dirk T. Verbeek" <dverbeek@xs4all.nl> - 2016-01-22 19:46 +0100
        Re: GUI "crash" "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 12:01 -0500
      Re: GUI "crash" philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2016-01-22 10:29 -0600
        Re: GUI "crash" "Dirk T. Verbeek" <dverbeek@xs4all.nl> - 2016-01-22 19:47 +0100
          Re: GUI "crash" philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2016-01-22 12:58 -0600
            Re: GUI "crash" mike antipasto <pizzadude@mycomputerrox.org> - 2016-01-22 19:20 -0500
              Re: GUI "crash" philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2016-01-22 18:29 -0600
                Re: GUI "crash" mike antipasto <pizzadude@mycomputerrox.org> - 2016-01-22 20:42 -0500
                Re: GUI "crash" philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2016-01-22 21:53 -0600
                Re: GUI "crash" "Dirk T. Verbeek" <dverbeek@xs4all.nl> - 2016-01-23 10:13 +0100
                Re: GUI "crash" philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2016-01-23 06:23 -0600
                Re: GUI "crash" "Dirk T. Verbeek" <dverbeek@xs4all.nl> - 2016-01-23 16:40 +0100
                Re: GUI "crash" philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2016-01-23 10:16 -0600
    Re: GUI "crash" philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2016-01-22 10:26 -0600
    Re: GUI "crash" DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2016-01-22 11:29 -0500
  Re: GUI "crash" ray carter <ray@zianet.com> - 2016-01-22 15:47 +0000
    Re: GUI "crash" philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2016-01-22 10:30 -0600
  Re: GUI "crash" Probable solution philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2016-01-22 13:40 -0600
    Re: GUI "crash" Probable solution "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2016-01-22 20:11 -0600
      Re: GUI "crash" Probable solution philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2016-01-22 21:32 -0600
        Re: GUI "crash" Probable solution Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> - 2016-01-23 11:36 +0000
          Re: GUI "crash" Probable solution philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2016-01-23 06:24 -0600
  Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2016-01-24 12:05 -0600
    Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 13:24 -0500
      Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2016-01-24 12:30 -0600
        Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2016-01-24 13:36 -0500
          Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer Catzilla <catzilla@pussyboss.invalid> - 2016-01-24 18:46 +0000
        Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> - 2016-01-24 19:18 +0000
          Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2016-01-24 13:56 -0600
            Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer "Dirk T. Verbeek" <dverbeek@xs4all.nl> - 2016-01-24 21:52 +0100
              Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2016-01-24 14:58 -0600
                Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer "Dirk T. Verbeek" <dverbeek@xs4all.nl> - 2016-01-24 23:03 +0100
                Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2016-01-24 17:23 -0600
            Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2016-01-24 18:11 -0500
            Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> - 2016-01-25 01:04 +0000
              Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2016-01-24 19:22 -0600
                Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> - 2016-01-25 08:39 +0000
                Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2016-01-25 04:33 -0600
              Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2016-01-24 23:06 -0600
                Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 00:15 -0500
                Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2016-01-24 23:42 -0600
                Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> - 2016-01-25 10:41 +0000
                Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2016-01-25 09:51 -0600
                Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer Wildman <best_lay@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-25 10:03 -0600
                Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2016-01-25 11:06 -0500
                Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2016-01-25 10:54 -0600
                Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2016-01-25 12:07 -0500
                Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-01-25 05:49 -0500
                Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2016-01-25 10:50 -0500
              Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2016-01-25 10:42 -0500
              Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2016-01-25 10:42 -0500
              Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-01-25 10:09 -0800
                Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> - 2016-01-26 09:00 +0000
                Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2016-01-26 05:26 -0500
          Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2016-01-24 18:09 -0500
            Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer Dan C <youmustbejoking@lan.invalid> - 2016-01-25 04:10 +0000

csiph-web