Re: GUI "crash"

From	mike antipasto <pizzadude@mycomputerrox.org>
Newsgroups	alt.os.linux.ubuntu
Subject	Re: GUI "crash"
Date	2016-01-22 19:20 -0500
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<n7ugqs$pk3$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	(1 earlier) <n7thum$kef$2@dont-email.me> <n7tjll$29c$1@dont-email.me> <n7tl7t$7s7$4@dont-email.me> <56a2792e$0$23722$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl> <n7ttv6$e5o$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 12:58:21 -0600, philo wrote:

> On 01/22/2016 12:47 PM, Dirk T. Verbeek wrote:
>> Op 22-01-16 om 17:29 schreef philo:
>>> On 01/22/2016 10:02 AM, Jonathan N. Little wrote:
>>>> Edmund wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 05:47:14 -0600, philo wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Using Ubuntu 15.10 (64bit) Dual core AMD / 8 gigs RAM and lower end
>>>>>> nVidia. System has had zero problems until recently when organizing my
>>>>>> extensive photo archives. I've been moving folders containing up to
>>>>>> 500
>>>>>> or 600 jpgs.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The moves have been 100% successful however Nautilus will often shut
>>>>>> down in the process and I'm left with it either stalled or a complete
>>>>>> blank desktop. Since I'm now mostly done organizing my data it's not
>>>>>> l a
>>>>>> major problem...but still I know that is absolutely incorrect behavior
>>>>>> and I'd like to correct it. Any ideas?
>>>>>
>>>>> For starters I don't consider 600 jpgs anything near a extensive photo
>>>>> collection. My cell phone alone can hold a lot more.
>>>>> My experience with several file browsers is more or less the same, they
>>>>> all fail when handling really large amounts of data.
>>>>> I can say it seems to be a file-browser problem but in fact I really
>>>>> have
>>>>> no idea what is causing these problems.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It is a bug that is documented for some time now and the GNOME folks
>>>> need to get off their butts and fix it. If you are on KDE I hear that
>>>> Dolphin has no such problems. BTW we have 88K images in our
>>>> repository...600 is nothing.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> With the hardware I have KDE is not an option. I tried it once at least
>>> and my entire system just plain ground to a halt...I was lucky that I
>>> could even log out.
>>>
>>> I am pretty sure that the problems I was experiencing with former
>>> versions of Ubuntu were simply due to have some KDE components
>>> installed. There is absolutely no KDE of any type on my current
>>> installation
>> Since quite a few years KDE is lighter than Gnome or Unity...
> 
> 
> 
> I don't want to chance it but may look into another file manager

You should look into another operating system.
Desktop Linux is a disaster.

Thread

GUI "crash" philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2016-01-22 05:47 -0600
  Re: GUI "crash" "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 09:17 -0500
    Re: GUI "crash" philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2016-01-22 08:27 -0600
      Re: GUI "crash" "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 10:53 -0500
        Re: GUI "crash" philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2016-01-22 10:18 -0600
    Re: GUI "crash" Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-01-22 07:19 -0800
      Re: GUI "crash" "Dirk T. Verbeek" <dverbeek@xs4all.nl> - 2016-01-22 16:52 +0100
      Re: GUI "crash" "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 10:57 -0500
        Re: GUI "crash" philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2016-01-22 10:25 -0600
      Re: GUI "crash" philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2016-01-22 10:24 -0600
  Re: GUI "crash" Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> - 2016-01-22 15:30 +0000
    Re: GUI "crash" "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 11:02 -0500
      Re: GUI "crash" Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be.invalid> - 2016-01-22 17:22 +0100
        Re: GUI "crash" DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2016-01-22 11:32 -0500
          Re: GUI "crash" "Dirk T. Verbeek" <dverbeek@xs4all.nl> - 2016-01-22 19:46 +0100
        Re: GUI "crash" "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 12:01 -0500
      Re: GUI "crash" philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2016-01-22 10:29 -0600
        Re: GUI "crash" "Dirk T. Verbeek" <dverbeek@xs4all.nl> - 2016-01-22 19:47 +0100
          Re: GUI "crash" philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2016-01-22 12:58 -0600
            Re: GUI "crash" mike antipasto <pizzadude@mycomputerrox.org> - 2016-01-22 19:20 -0500
              Re: GUI "crash" philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2016-01-22 18:29 -0600
                Re: GUI "crash" mike antipasto <pizzadude@mycomputerrox.org> - 2016-01-22 20:42 -0500
                Re: GUI "crash" philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2016-01-22 21:53 -0600
                Re: GUI "crash" "Dirk T. Verbeek" <dverbeek@xs4all.nl> - 2016-01-23 10:13 +0100
                Re: GUI "crash" philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2016-01-23 06:23 -0600
                Re: GUI "crash" "Dirk T. Verbeek" <dverbeek@xs4all.nl> - 2016-01-23 16:40 +0100
                Re: GUI "crash" philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2016-01-23 10:16 -0600
    Re: GUI "crash" philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2016-01-22 10:26 -0600
    Re: GUI "crash" DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2016-01-22 11:29 -0500
  Re: GUI "crash" ray carter <ray@zianet.com> - 2016-01-22 15:47 +0000
    Re: GUI "crash" philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2016-01-22 10:30 -0600
  Re: GUI "crash" Probable solution philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2016-01-22 13:40 -0600
    Re: GUI "crash" Probable solution "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2016-01-22 20:11 -0600
      Re: GUI "crash" Probable solution philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2016-01-22 21:32 -0600
        Re: GUI "crash" Probable solution Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> - 2016-01-23 11:36 +0000
          Re: GUI "crash" Probable solution philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2016-01-23 06:24 -0600
  Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2016-01-24 12:05 -0600
    Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 13:24 -0500
      Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2016-01-24 12:30 -0600
        Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2016-01-24 13:36 -0500
          Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer Catzilla <catzilla@pussyboss.invalid> - 2016-01-24 18:46 +0000
        Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> - 2016-01-24 19:18 +0000
          Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2016-01-24 13:56 -0600
            Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer "Dirk T. Verbeek" <dverbeek@xs4all.nl> - 2016-01-24 21:52 +0100
              Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2016-01-24 14:58 -0600
                Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer "Dirk T. Verbeek" <dverbeek@xs4all.nl> - 2016-01-24 23:03 +0100
                Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2016-01-24 17:23 -0600
            Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2016-01-24 18:11 -0500
            Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> - 2016-01-25 01:04 +0000
              Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2016-01-24 19:22 -0600
                Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> - 2016-01-25 08:39 +0000
                Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2016-01-25 04:33 -0600
              Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2016-01-24 23:06 -0600
                Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 00:15 -0500
                Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2016-01-24 23:42 -0600
                Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> - 2016-01-25 10:41 +0000
                Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2016-01-25 09:51 -0600
                Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer Wildman <best_lay@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-25 10:03 -0600
                Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2016-01-25 11:06 -0500
                Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2016-01-25 10:54 -0600
                Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2016-01-25 12:07 -0500
                Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-01-25 05:49 -0500
                Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2016-01-25 10:50 -0500
              Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2016-01-25 10:42 -0500
              Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2016-01-25 10:42 -0500
              Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-01-25 10:09 -0800
                Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> - 2016-01-26 09:00 +0000
                Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2016-01-26 05:26 -0500
          Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2016-01-24 18:09 -0500
            Re: GUI "crash" Follow up and answer Dan C <youmustbejoking@lan.invalid> - 2016-01-25 04:10 +0000

csiph-web