Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #547045

Re: Questions for John Sefton

From Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: Questions for John Sefton
Date 2016-01-21 16:23 -0600
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <n7rlp2$aja$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References (4 earlier) <2d3eae2d-a456-4924-bfd9-f06f212c7045@googlegroups.com> <n7qrhl$mn5$1@gioia.aioe.org> <fd6e9f6c-4d40-411a-920e-55db644e48e0@googlegroups.com> <n7rglv$1il$1@gioia.aioe.org> <b9b06e29-ee77-4af3-ad5e-58cbb117b6b7@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On 1/21/2016 4:01 PM, James McGinn wrote:
> On Thursday, January 21, 2016 at 12:56:38 PM UTC-8, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>> On 1/21/2016 2:45 PM, James McGinn wrote:
>>> On Thursday, January 21, 2016 at 6:55:56 AM UTC-8, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>>
>>>> There's no question you feel excluded and disrespected, and there's no
>>>> question that you have decided to respond to disrespect with disrespect.
>>>> Combine that with the fact that you do not have company in your beliefs,
>>>> and that disrespect can boil up to conspiracy theory, savior complex,
>>>> and megalomania -- all of which is a very common way for the mind to
>>>> compensate for deep insecurities and crushingly low self-esteem.
>>>
>>> Well, no.  I'm just saying that many science consumers--yourself
>>> being a perfect example--talk about science as an abstraction,
>>
>> In what way do you see me talking about science as an abstraction. Can
>> you cite some examples?
>
> What is really funny is how desperate you nitwits become when your "truth"
> can't be found on wiki or internet.

Does this answer the question about examples of me talking about science 
as an abstraction, or is it avoiding the question and deflecting to some 
other point you might think you have?

Did you forget to notice that the last reference I gave you was from a 
book, not from wikipedia or anywhere else on the internet?

>
>
>>
>>> and they are actually pedantic fools who don't really understand
>>> science.  Science is about dealing with facts and addressing
>>> substantive issue.
>>
>> Facts, yes. "Substantive issue" is a subjective judgment. What seems
>> substantive to you may not be of interest to anyone but you.
>>
>>> It's about addressing issues explicitly and
>>> finding resolution.
>>
>> Well, I can see that what you want is for people to address issues that
>> you perceive as important, and then spending sufficient time with you to
>> achieve resolution. Unfortunately, you are not owed that, and it is not
>> implicit in the charter of science either, as far as I've read. There
>> are LOTS of goofball ideas out there, and if you believe for one second
>> that each and every one of those goofball ideas needs to be treated
>> seriously, given thorough attention, and worked out to a resolution
>> satisfactory to all sides, then I'm afraid you're hopelessly naive, not
>> to mention an attention whore. Some ideas just are not worth paying
>> attention to, and by golly Jim, you've been carrying around a fine
>> example of that for years.
>
> You are a retard that knows how to use a search engine.  That's it.

Which is a comment completely irrelevant to what I just told you about 
what science does and does not owe you. You can choose to ignore what I 
told you until you drop dead from a coronary, but ignoring it won't 
change it or make it go away.

I can fully understand how frustrating it must be to you to have an idea 
that only you think is significant, and about which you have succeeded 
in getting a hair less than scant attention. Now, in response to that, 
feel free to say something else about wikipedia.

>
>
>>
>>> It is not about what is known, any idiot
>>> can look something up on wiki.  The internet has given people
>>> like you false confidence that they are scientists when actually
>>> they are just typist.
>>>
>>
>> I don't use the internet for resources unless someone ASKS for an
>> internet resource. I much prefer reading books. That's where facts are.
>
> You are a pedantic fool.
>


-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Questions for John Sefton Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 14:53 -0600
  Re: Questions for John Sefton James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 13:06 -0800
    Re: Questions for John Sefton Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 17:21 -0600
      Re: Questions for John Sefton James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 15:28 -0800
        Re: Questions for John Sefton Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 18:07 -0600
          Re: Questions for John Sefton James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 16:34 -0800
            Re: Questions for John Sefton Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 18:43 -0600
              Re: Questions for John Sefton James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 16:50 -0800
                Re: Questions for John Sefton Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-19 19:50 -0600
                Re: Questions for John Sefton Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 07:07 -0600
        Re: Questions for John Sefton Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 18:09 -0600
          Re: Questions for John Sefton moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-01-20 03:47 +0000
            Re: Questions for John Sefton James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 20:40 -0800
              Re: Questions for John Sefton Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 07:30 -0600
                Re: Questions for John Sefton john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 05:58 -0800
                Re: Questions for John Sefton Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 11:15 -0600
                Re: Questions for John Sefton Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 16:32 -0600
            Re: Questions for John Sefton "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 22:47 -0800
        Re: Questions for John Sefton Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 10:11 -0800
          Re: Questions for John Sefton Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 14:06 -0600
    Re: Questions for John Sefton Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 17:56 -0600
  Re: Questions for John Sefton Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-19 20:11 -0800
  Questions for John Sefton jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-01-20 05:41 -0800
    Re: Questions for John Sefton Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 07:52 -0600
    Questions for John Sefton HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 07:03 -0800
    Re: Questions for John Sefton Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 09:24 -0600
      Re: Questions for John Sefton jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-01-20 10:03 -0800
        Re: Questions for John Sefton Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 12:29 -0600
        Re: Questions for John Sefton Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 13:55 -0600
          Re: Questions for John Sefton jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-01-21 07:58 -0800
            Re: Questions for John Sefton Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 10:26 -0600
              Re: Questions for John Sefton jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-01-29 12:26 -0800
                Re: Questions for John Sefton Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 15:02 -0600
      Re: Questions for John Sefton Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 12:50 -0800
        Re: Questions for John Sefton Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 13:15 -0800
          Re: Questions for John Sefton Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 13:44 -0800
    Re: Questions for John Sefton Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-20 10:07 -0600
    Re: Questions for John Sefton James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 09:55 -0800
      Re: Questions for John Sefton Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-20 12:53 -0600
      Re: Questions for John Sefton Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 16:40 -0600
        Re: Questions for John Sefton James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-20 15:23 -0800
          Re: Questions for John Sefton Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-20 19:22 -0600
            Re: Questions for John Sefton john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 05:38 -0800
              Re: Questions for John Sefton Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 08:41 -0600
                Re: Questions for John Sefton john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 07:01 -0800
                Re: Questions for John Sefton Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 09:18 -0600
                Re: Questions for John Sefton Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 09:26 -0600
                Re: Questions for John Sefton HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 09:01 -0800
                Re: Questions for John Sefton benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 20:37 -0500
                Re: Questions for John Sefton Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 11:12 -0600
                Re: Questions for John Sefton moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-01-21 18:00 +0000
                Re: Questions for John Sefton "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 11:49 -0800
              Re: Questions for John Sefton HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 06:55 -0800
                Re: Questions for John Sefton "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 11:52 -0800
                Re: Questions for John Sefton john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 12:29 -0800
                Re: Questions for John Sefton Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 14:46 -0600
              Re: Questions for John Sefton Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-21 10:25 -0600
          Re: Questions for John Sefton Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 08:55 -0600
            Re: Questions for John Sefton James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 12:45 -0800
              Re: Questions for John Sefton Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 14:56 -0600
                Re: Questions for John Sefton James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 14:01 -0800
                Re: Questions for John Sefton Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 16:23 -0600
                Re: Questions for John Sefton James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 15:27 -0800
                Re: Questions for John Sefton Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 17:39 -0600
                Re: Questions for John Sefton James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 16:27 -0800
                Re: Questions for John Sefton Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-21 21:56 -0600
                Re: Questions for John Sefton Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 07:47 -0600
                Re: Questions for John Sefton Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 18:04 -0600
                Re: Questions for John Sefton benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 20:43 -0500
                Re: Questions for John Sefton Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 07:32 -0600
                Re: Questions for John Sefton Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-01-22 08:43 -0600
                Re: Questions for John Sefton john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 06:56 -0800
                Re: Questions for John Sefton Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 08:59 -0600
                Re: Questions for John Sefton john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 07:34 -0800
                Re: Questions for John Sefton Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 10:22 -0600
                Re: Questions for John Sefton john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 08:45 -0800
                Re: Questions for John Sefton john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 08:51 -0800
                Re: Questions for John Sefton Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 11:05 -0600
                Re: Questions for John Sefton john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 09:44 -0800
                Re: Questions for John Sefton Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 11:51 -0600
                Re: Questions for John Sefton john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 10:10 -0800
                Re: Questions for John Sefton Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 12:31 -0600
                Re: Questions for John Sefton HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 10:50 -0800
                Re: Questions for John Sefton benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 02:17 -0500
                Re: Questions for John Sefton moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-01-22 19:01 +0000
                Re: Questions for John Sefton john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 12:03 -0800
                Re: Questions for John Sefton Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 12:02 -0600
                Re: Questions for John Sefton Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 11:00 -0600
              Re: Questions for John Sefton Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 15:06 -0600
                Re: Questions for John Sefton James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 13:59 -0800
                Re: Questions for John Sefton Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 16:18 -0600
                Re: Questions for John Sefton James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 15:22 -0800
                Re: Questions for John Sefton Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 17:31 -0600
                Re: Questions for John Sefton James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 16:21 -0800
                Re: Questions for John Sefton Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 07:53 -0600
                Re: Questions for John Sefton Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 16:32 -0600
  Re: Questions for John Sefton Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 13:06 -0600
  Questions for John Sefton john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 17:45 -0800
    Re: Questions for John Sefton Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 07:29 -0600

csiph-web