Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.php > #16321

Canonical URLs, truncated URLs, redirects and SEO

From James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.php
Subject Canonical URLs, truncated URLs, redirects and SEO
Date 2016-01-21 16:39 +0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <n7r1eb$cb1$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


Is there a good place to ask about the following? I thought I had 
previously seen some Usenet groups specifically about web development 
but for some reason cannot find any just now.

My query is about having a "normal" URL which could be lengthy, and 
allowing there to be a truncated form. For example, a full/long URL 
could be of the form

 
http://mysite.com/article-1053/what-are-the-main-reasons-why-the-web-might-need-to-have-shorter-forms-for-certain-urls

The shorter, truncated one would be

   http://mysite.com/article-1053

I wanted to ask for some advice on different ways of shortening the URL 
(as the URL form, above, is just one option), about which form would be 
best as canonical, and a related matter about 301 (i.e. permanent) 
redirects to remove the usual "www." prefix.

Any one here aware of a Usenet group that would be good for such queries?

James

Back to comp.lang.php | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Canonical URLs, truncated URLs, redirects and SEO James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-21 16:39 +0000
  Re: Canonical URLs, truncated URLs, redirects and SEO crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-01-21 11:22 -0700
    Re: Canonical URLs, truncated URLs, redirects and SEO James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 13:58 +0000
  Re: Canonical URLs, truncated URLs, redirects and SEO Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-01-21 19:16 +0000
    Re: Canonical URLs, truncated URLs, redirects and SEO James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 14:03 +0000
  Re: Canonical URLs, truncated URLs, redirects and SEO Richard Yates <richard@yatesguitar.com> - 2016-01-21 12:31 -0800
    Re: Canonical URLs, truncated URLs, redirects and SEO Allodoxaphobia <knock_yourself_out@example.net> - 2016-01-21 22:42 +0000
  Re: Canonical URLs, truncated URLs, redirects and SEO Goran <goran@nospam.com> - 2016-01-22 13:01 +0100
    Re: Canonical URLs, truncated URLs, redirects and SEO James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 14:11 +0000
      Re: Canonical URLs, truncated URLs, redirects and SEO Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2016-01-22 17:03 +0100
        Re: Canonical URLs, truncated URLs, redirects and SEO James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 11:59 +0000
          Re: Canonical URLs, truncated URLs, redirects and SEO Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-01-23 13:09 +0000
            Re: Canonical URLs, truncated URLs, redirects and SEO James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 16:17 +0000
              Re: Canonical URLs, truncated URLs, redirects and SEO "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2016-01-23 20:11 +0100
                Re: Canonical URLs, truncated URLs, redirects and SEO James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-24 21:35 +0000
  Re: Canonical URLs, truncated URLs, redirects and SEO Eli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com> - 2016-01-25 22:20 +0000

csiph-web