Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.os.linux.ubuntu > #186165
| From | crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.os.linux.ubuntu, alt.os.linux |
| Subject | Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) |
| Date | 2016-01-13 04:44 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <n75d63$361$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (12 earlier) <n701q0$icg$1@dont-email.me> <87y4bwnr33.fsf@thumper.dhh.gt.org> <n72lgt$kd0$1@dont-email.me> <v7Gdnfkg6KTotwjLnZ2dnUU7-VOdnZ2d@giganews.com> <20160112125653.7a90904a@wizardstower.lan> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Cybe R. Wizard wrote: > On Tue, 12 Jan 2016 08:31:49 -0800 > Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: > >> On 2016-01-12, crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote: >> > Linux is built on the multi-user paradigm. That's fine for >> > universities or corporations that have mainframes or server-farms >> > large enough to bother sharing, but day by day it is becoming >> > yesterday's paradigm, because the number of individual-use systems >> > is outgrowing multi-user systems by orders of magnitude. >> >> Wow, I couldn't disagree more. Windows spent a long time and a lot of >> money to become multi-user from its single user days. Steve jobs used >> to show off features that fast user switching. Having multiple users >> on one PC is very much alive and well. It's even spreading to >> Android. And from a security point of view it is a must have feature. >> >> > Today's paradigm is thin-client/server. Indivudal-user thin >> > clients, backed by servers that may be local to the same hardware, >> > or remote on a network. >> >> You will always have consumers that want consumer grade hardware and >> software. If you're in this group I seriously doubt those are the >> shoes you put on in the morning. >> >> Aside from a few trolls, we're all using multi-user by choice. >> > When my daughters were young and in school we had only the one > computer. We each had our own user and switched between them all the > time, at least 4 or 5 times an evening depending on who neede4d it. > Those users still exist on my current machine and sometimes when they > are over they still use them. > > Multi-user is not dead and still has uses for families with only one > box. > > Cybe R. Wizard We've got our terminology twisted up here. A laptop is a simple model. One screen, one keyboard, a pointing device or two, those are (in generic terms) what one user needs to communicate with the system. Only one user can operate those controls at a time (unless your cat walks over the keyboard, or you're using a microphone at a party). That user can be logged in on his "workstation", or not. If userA logs out and userB logs in, it's still one user at a time. What I call a multi-user system is a system where both userA and userB are logged in at the same time. This is the old model where something like a mainframe is supporting many users at once. It's the model where you install applications in the root directory because you're saving storage by sharing the apps between users. It's the model where simultaneous access to files by multiple users becomes potentially problematic. Here's where it gets potentially confusing. When userA is logged in, his "Desktop Environment" can be viewed as a thin-client between the user and the OS, even if that DE is a line-mode console. It takes input from the user and sends it to the OS. The question of whether that is done via direct-function-call or remote-procedure-call is kind of irrelevant, since rpc amounts to dfc where the function directly called acts as an intermediary to the remote procedure; the real differences are in timing and complexity with a nod to connectivity. If you consider the DE to be a thin-client, it doesn't matter whether the server for a particular operation is on the local hardware or on remote hardware. In the case of current linux systems it may be /usr/bin/cp that acts as your server, even though you might think of it as just a linux core command. It's mostly a way of looking at what we have now, until you start looking at where apps are installed and where app data lands. The multi-user view puts the apps in /usr/bin/wherever and there's one copy of each app per system. The thin-client view puts the apps in userA or userB's storage space, rather than in the shared storage of /usr/bin or wherever. The multi-user paradigm puts all the apps in one place, and both you and your daughters and whoever else are pretty much stuck with the same set of applications. Somebody designated as "adminstrator" does the installing and maintaining. App data gets jammed into /home along with the data for previous versions of the app which might not be compatible. With the thin-client paradigm each user has his own storage space and his own apps and his own data. userA can update his apps without affecting userB or userC. They can all still use the "system" commands and services. There's a separation between "system" and "apps" that lets both become more modular and maintainable. Applications can become independent of what distro they're running on top of, distros can be updated without screwing around all the apps people are trying to use when the email tells them that "On Friday night we are updating to version XXX and you will need to convert your data to the new format good luck". -- http://totally-portable-software.blogspot.com [Sun Nov 22: "Total Portability is not binary"]
Back to alt.os.linux.ubuntu | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-01-06 23:35 +0100
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2016-01-06 18:11 -0600
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Wildman <best_lay@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-06 19:23 -0600
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2016-01-07 09:03 -0600
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2016-01-07 10:35 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Wildman <best_lay@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-07 16:03 -0600
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2016-01-09 09:41 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@gmail.com> - 2016-01-09 10:03 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2016-01-09 09:14 -0600
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2016-01-09 11:37 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2016-01-09 09:08 -0600
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2016-01-09 11:42 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2016-01-10 09:59 +0000
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) mike <ham789@netzero.net> - 2016-01-09 12:22 -0800
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2016-01-09 17:36 -0600
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Catzilla <catzilla@pussyboss.invalid> - 2016-01-09 23:53 +0000
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2016-01-09 20:38 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Catzilla <catzilla@pussyboss.invalid> - 2016-01-10 02:03 +0000
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Catzilla <catzilla@pussyboss.invalid> - 2016-01-10 02:54 +0000
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2016-01-09 22:21 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Catzilla <catzilla@pussyboss.invalid> - 2016-01-10 03:24 +0000
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2016-01-09 23:21 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Catzilla <catzilla@pussyboss.invalid> - 2016-01-10 04:25 +0000
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Catzilla <catzilla@pussyboss.invalid> - 2016-01-10 03:29 +0000
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2016-01-09 22:18 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Catzilla <catzilla@pussyboss.invalid> - 2016-01-10 03:20 +0000
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2016-01-09 23:19 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Catzilla <catzilla@pussyboss.invalid> - 2016-01-10 04:23 +0000
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2016-01-10 00:40 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Catzilla <catzilla@pussyboss.invalid> - 2016-01-10 12:47 +0000
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2016-01-10 08:40 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Catzilla <catzilla@pussyboss.invalid> - 2016-01-10 14:30 +0000
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Wildman <best_lay@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-10 00:29 -0600
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Catzilla <catzilla@pussyboss.invalid> - 2016-01-10 12:32 +0000
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2016-01-10 08:28 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Catzilla <catzilla@pussyboss.invalid> - 2016-01-10 13:33 +0000
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2016-01-10 08:42 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Catzilla <catzilla@pussyboss.invalid> - 2016-01-10 13:55 +0000
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Penny Tration <fedora_the_explora@asia.com> - 2016-01-10 22:49 +0000
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2016-01-10 19:07 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Penny Tration <fedora_the_explora@asia.com> - 2016-01-11 02:56 +0000
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2016-01-11 00:14 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-01-11 20:35 +0000
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2016-01-10 12:15 -0200
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Catzilla <catzilla@pussyboss.invalid> - 2016-01-10 14:23 +0000
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2016-01-10 14:09 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2016-01-09 20:32 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-01-10 06:27 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2016-01-10 08:25 -0500
Buh bye redux Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-01-10 08:26 -0500
Re: Buh bye redux DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2016-01-10 08:41 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) "Dirk T. Verbeek" <dverbeek@xs4all.nl> - 2016-01-10 17:27 +0100
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2016-01-10 11:32 -0200
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-01-09 18:43 -0700
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2016-01-09 22:17 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2016-01-09 23:10 -0600
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2016-01-10 00:42 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-01-10 06:30 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-01-10 05:09 -0700
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-01-10 08:24 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-01-10 06:44 -0700
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2016-01-10 14:05 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-01-10 13:03 -0700
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2016-01-10 08:52 -0600
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-01-10 08:27 -0800
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2016-01-10 11:03 -0600
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@gmail.com> - 2016-01-10 12:25 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-01-10 15:13 -0800
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2016-01-10 17:29 -0600
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@gmail.com> - 2016-01-10 18:31 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-01-11 03:59 -0700
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2016-01-11 08:11 -0600
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-01-11 10:22 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 10:32 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-01-11 08:44 -0800
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2016-01-11 16:51 +0000
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-01-12 04:18 -0700
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-01-12 08:14 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-01-12 07:01 -0700
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-01-12 09:43 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-01-12 08:40 -0700
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-01-12 15:58 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-01-12 08:49 -0800
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-01-12 10:42 -0700
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Eef Hartman <E.J.M.Hartman@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 18:33 +0000
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-01-12 16:00 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2016-01-13 12:21 +0000
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-01-13 08:10 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-01-13 06:48 -0700
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-01-13 12:59 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-01-13 14:24 -0700
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-01-13 16:51 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Bud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com> - 2016-01-14 14:58 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Bud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com> - 2016-01-14 11:24 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-01-14 11:35 -0700
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) stepore <linshine@here.now> - 2016-01-12 15:04 -0800
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Eef Hartman <E.J.M.Hartman@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 22:38 +0000
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-01-11 15:53 -0800
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Eef Hartman <E.J.M.Hartman@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 01:01 +0000
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-01-11 18:29 -0800
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Eef Hartman <E.J.M.Hartman@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 04:14 +0000
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-01-12 04:27 -0700
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-01-12 03:51 -0700
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-01-12 03:48 -0700
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) mike <ham789@netzero.net> - 2016-01-12 03:22 -0800
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2016-01-12 12:47 +0000
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-01-12 08:31 -0800
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2016-01-12 11:16 -0600
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-01-12 10:47 -0700
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2016-01-12 12:58 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) mike <ham789@netzero.net> - 2016-01-12 10:01 -0800
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2016-01-12 15:12 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Bud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com> - 2016-01-13 08:58 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-01-12 10:46 -0700
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-01-12 11:56 -0800
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-01-13 04:05 -0700
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-01-13 08:38 -0800
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-01-13 14:27 -0700
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2016-01-13 12:30 +0000
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2016-01-13 13:44 +0000
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Jim Diamond <Jim.Diamond@deletethis.AcadiaU.ca> - 2016-01-13 14:11 -0400
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-01-13 14:30 -0700
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Wildman <best_lay@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-13 16:52 -0600
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Eef Hartman <E.J.M.Hartman@gmail.com> - 2016-01-14 00:16 +0000
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-01-14 05:51 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Jim Diamond <Jim.Diamond@deletethis.AcadiaU.ca> - 2016-01-14 08:56 -0400
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-01-14 09:34 -0700
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-01-14 11:43 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-01-14 11:50 -0700
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-01-14 08:52 -0800
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Jim Diamond <Jim.Diamond@deletethis.AcadiaU.ca> - 2016-01-14 14:00 -0400
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-01-14 13:28 -0700
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2016-01-12 12:56 -0600
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@gmail.com> - 2016-01-12 18:17 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-01-13 05:11 -0700
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@gmail.com> - 2016-01-13 09:38 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2016-01-13 08:42 -0600
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2016-01-13 09:48 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2016-01-13 09:58 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-01-13 08:51 -0800
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-01-13 15:31 -0700
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) mike <ham789@netzero.net> - 2016-01-13 23:03 -0800
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2016-01-14 02:34 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-01-13 14:35 -0700
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-01-13 04:44 -0700
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Eef Hartman <E.J.M.Hartman@gmail.com> - 2016-01-13 14:51 +0000
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-01-13 15:36 -0700
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-01-10 13:36 -0700
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) stepore <linshine@here.now> - 2016-01-10 20:49 -0800
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-01-10 20:58 -0800
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) stepore <linshine@here.now> - 2016-01-10 21:02 -0800
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Eef Hartman <E.J.M.Hartman@gmail.com> - 2016-01-11 08:54 +0000
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2016-01-11 08:00 -0600
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2016-01-10 08:26 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2016-01-10 08:34 -0600
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Kirk_Von_Rockstein <Kirk_Von_Rockstein@nowhere.invalid> - 2016-01-10 10:41 +0000
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-01-10 04:56 -0700
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Kirk_Von_Rockstein <Kirk_Von_Rockstein@nowhere.invalid> - 2016-01-11 15:23 +0000
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-01-12 04:36 -0700
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Henry Crun <mike@rechtman.com> - 2016-01-12 14:04 +0200
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2016-01-12 12:52 +0000
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-01-12 06:18 -0700
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2016-01-12 09:58 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-01-12 08:48 -0700
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Henry Crun <mike@rechtman.com> - 2016-01-13 03:49 +0200
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-01-13 05:13 -0700
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2016-01-10 09:53 +0000
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) "Auric__" <not.my.real@email.address> - 2016-01-07 05:55 +0000
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) stepore <linshine@here.now> - 2016-01-07 00:21 -0800
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) stepore <linshine@here.now> - 2016-01-07 00:26 -0800
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2016-01-07 13:54 -0200
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-01-07 19:28 +0100
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) gamo <gamo@telecable.es> - 2016-01-07 21:52 +0100
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2016-01-08 11:08 -0200
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2016-01-08 08:38 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2016-01-08 17:14 -0200
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) mike <ham789@netzero.net> - 2016-01-08 20:51 -0800
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2016-01-09 01:39 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) mike <ham789@netzero.net> - 2016-01-09 13:24 -0800
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Caver1 <caver1@inthemud.org> - 2016-01-09 16:32 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Wildman <best_lay@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-10 00:45 -0600
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2016-01-10 11:42 -0200
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2016-01-09 08:34 +0000
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2016-01-09 10:41 -0200
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) mike <ham789@netzero.net> - 2016-01-09 13:33 -0800
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Wildman <best_lay@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-10 00:41 -0600
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2016-01-10 08:16 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2016-01-10 12:08 -0200
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) mike <ham789@netzero.net> - 2016-01-10 14:24 -0800
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@gmail.com> - 2016-01-09 09:02 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) "Dirk T. Verbeek" <dverbeek@xs4all.nl> - 2016-01-08 18:26 +0100
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) stepore <linshine@here.now> - 2016-01-08 22:56 -0800
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2016-01-09 10:51 -0200
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) gamo <gamo@telecable.es> - 2016-01-09 14:12 +0100
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@gmail.com> - 2016-01-09 09:13 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) gamo <gamo@telecable.es> - 2016-01-09 15:32 +0100
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@gmail.com> - 2016-01-09 09:59 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@gmail.com> - 2016-01-09 10:01 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) gamo <gamo@telecable.es> - 2016-01-09 16:52 +0100
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@gmail.com> - 2016-01-09 11:07 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) gamo <gamo@telecable.es> - 2016-01-09 17:31 +0100
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@gmail.com> - 2016-01-09 12:30 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) stepore <linshine@here.now> - 2016-01-09 10:33 -0800
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) gamo <gamo@telecable.es> - 2016-01-09 21:47 +0100
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@gmail.com> - 2016-01-10 10:03 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) gamo <gamo@telecable.es> - 2016-01-10 17:39 +0100
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@gmail.com> - 2016-01-10 12:28 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) gamo <gamo@telecable.es> - 2016-01-10 19:03 +0100
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) "Dirk T. Verbeek" <dverbeek@xs4all.nl> - 2016-01-10 19:26 +0100
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) gamo <gamo@telecable.es> - 2016-01-10 19:31 +0100
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2016-01-10 14:15 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) gamo <gamo@telecable.es> - 2016-01-10 21:08 +0100
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) "Dirk T. Verbeek" <dverbeek@xs4all.nl> - 2016-01-10 22:37 +0100
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2016-01-10 18:57 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2016-01-10 14:30 -0600
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) gamo <gamo@telecable.es> - 2016-01-10 22:40 +0100
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@gmail.com> - 2016-01-10 20:56 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Bud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com> - 2016-01-11 08:52 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2016-01-11 10:11 -0600
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-01-11 09:06 -0800
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) system8752@home.comm - 2016-01-11 01:10 -0600
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Harold Stevens <wookie@cindy.localdomain> - 2016-01-11 06:21 -0600
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Bud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com> - 2016-01-11 08:29 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2016-01-11 08:54 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) mike <ham789@netzero.net> - 2016-01-11 12:06 -0800
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2016-01-11 16:53 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) mike <ham789@netzero.net> - 2016-01-11 16:25 -0800
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2016-01-12 02:42 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2016-01-11 16:54 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Catzilla <catzilla@pussyboss.invalid> - 2016-01-12 00:20 +0000
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-01-11 09:03 -0800
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) pioruns <cvbehaf@b2.cy> - 2016-01-07 20:08 +0000
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) F8BOE <f8boe@bluemail.ch> - 2016-01-08 07:47 +0100
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2016-01-08 06:45 -0500
Re: Vote for Ubuntu! ;) mike antipasto <pizzadude@mycomputerrox.org> - 2016-01-09 00:15 -0500
Re: Vote for Your Distro Big Al <Big_Al@invalid.com> - 2016-01-11 12:58 -0500
csiph-web