Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #340345

Re: My opinion is just that, nothing more.

Show all headers | View raw

On 1/11/2016 4:33 PM, vallor wrote:


> While I'm flattered to be the subject of personalities, there is no
> need to worry about my own personal circumstances.

Your wife needs to worry, or she'll find herself doing CPR on a gasping, 
rotund lump of flesh that's turning blue.



> I'm healthy as a horse,

LMAO!   You're severely or morbidly obese, with the high cholesterol and 
triglycerides and blood pressure that go along with it.  I'd be shocked 
if you /didn't/ have diabetes, sleep apnea, and trouble finding 4XL briefs.



> far healthier than some anonymous georgia
> squidbilly that ate himself into diabetes.


By what measures are you considered "healthy", big fella?

If that corporate pic is anything to go by, you're FAR from healthy.  At 
that size, you're not far from death.

http://i.imgur.com/3k55mlR.jpg



Here's what I looked like when I was diagnosed diabetic (aic of 7.7):

http://s14.postimg.org/n23g3l4n5/DFS_FDB.jpg

That's 6'1" and 220lbs.  You can even see some veins.


Now you go ahead and strike a FDB pose for us, Jabba.  We need some laughs.



> I also probably eat much healthier than he does

All recent pics of you to the contrary.



> -- and unlike him, I don't binge drink (or drink at all).

Idiot.

Where's your single shred of evidence I drink more than once a year, let 
alone regularly or binge?  Bring it, or retract your whale babbling.




> I could also go into the sociopathic tendencies of those who are
> clearly troubled, but all I'm going to say is this:
>
> What we have here are anonymous trolls trying to get a rise out of
> people, me included.  They don't really believe what they're saying
> unless they are self-deluded idiots -- instead, they spew their
> vitriol by scouring the net for the most unflattering photos they can
> find, and then making moronic extrapolations from them.


Funny that the most unflattering pic of you is your official corporate
mugshot.

http://i.imgur.com/3k55mlR.jpg

Your cheek and chins melt into your neck, which melts into your 
shoulder. Since when did the camera add 100 lbs?




> Their "job" is to paint others in the worst possible light.  And
> again: unless they are self-deluded idiots, they must know that their
> idiocies include out-and-out lies.  And as I've said before, "they
> delight in clipping the wings of others because they cannot fly."
>
> We can even go further than that now, because one of them has
> admitted to being jealous of my situation.  Given the amount of
> discussion on the topic, I have to wonder why people care so much
> about my personal situations, _unless_ they have some feelings of
> envy.
>
> But there is no need for that.  Living and working here in Santa Rosa
> has its own set of challenges, and working in the fields I do
> require constant learning to separate the "wheat" from the "chaff"
> of technological advances.  However, the work I used to do on my own
> is now handled by a department (operations) with two divisions
> (systems and networking).
>
> So I consider myself semi-retired.  Considering the extreme hours
> and sweat-equity I've put into our company, it's only fair that I
> have a lot of leisure time these days.  (And you would too, if you
> could swing it.) We were in startup mode much longer than we should
> have been -- so much, that it affected my health.  So now I take it
> easy, and work on various devops projects that interest me.
>
> But despite the toll it took on my personal health,


huh?  You just said you were healthy as a horse?



> I think
> everybody should try to be an entrepreneur in whatever field they
> enjoy.  Maybe I'm lucky, and this is a personal luxury that many
> can't swing -- but if you go into it with eyes wide open and a decent
> business plan, the rewards are tremendous.

> In closing, I'll mention that I think the toughest part of
> entrepreneurship is growing a business from a sole proprietorship to
> more than just a few people.  Because: one has to learn to delegate
> tasks that one _feels certain_ can only be handled "properly" by
> oneself.  That letting go takes trust, and it's not easy, especially
> if you are working in a highly-technical field.
>
> Anyway, I've rambled on enough.  Take care and happy new year.

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Here piggy, piggy, piggy "Hardon" <hardon@gmail.com> - 2016-01-07 20:57 +0100
  Re: Here piggy, piggy, piggy Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-01-07 15:19 -0500
    Re: Here piggy, piggy, piggy "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2016-01-07 16:21 -0500
  Re: Here piggy, piggy, piggy chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-01-07 14:23 -0600
    Poor Shitv.  LOL!!! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-01-07 13:50 -0700
    Here trolly, trolly, trolly Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-01-07 16:54 -0500
      Re: Here trolly, trolly, trolly vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-01-08 23:36 +0000
        Re: Here trolly, trolly, trolly mike antipasto <pizzadude@mycomputerrox.org> - 2016-01-08 23:45 -0500
          Re: Here trolly, trolly, trolly "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2016-01-09 18:18 -0500
            Re: Here trolly, trolly, trolly owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-01-10 00:26 +0000
            Re: Here trolly, trolly, trolly Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-01-10 10:29 -0500
              Re: Here trolly, trolly, trolly "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2016-01-10 14:29 -0500
                Re: Here trolly, trolly, trolly Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-01-10 19:42 -0500
        Re: Here trolly, trolly, trolly DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-09 00:14 -0500
          Re: Here trolly, trolly, trolly DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-09 00:16 -0500
          Re: Here trolly, trolly, trolly Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-01-09 10:19 -0500
            Re: Here trolly, trolly, trolly "Dr. John Grubor" <grubor@grubor.org.invalid> - 2016-01-10 14:56 +0000
              Re: Here trolly, trolly, trolly Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-01-10 10:48 -0500
        Re: Scott Doty isn't trying to be a supermodel. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-01-08 21:26 -0800
          Spending less is smart. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-01-09 14:30 -0800
            Renting is cheaper. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-01-09 20:09 -0800
              Re: Scott Doty has the most rewarding job, I think. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-01-10 05:36 -0800
                Re: "Smart" is spending less, and eating (slightly) more. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-01-10 16:17 -0800
                Re: My opinion is just that, nothing more. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-01-11 07:28 -0800
                Re: My opinion is just that, nothing more. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-01-11 21:33 +0000
                Re: My opinion is just that, nothing more. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-01-11 14:21 -0800
                Re: My opinion is just that, nothing more. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-01-11 17:31 -0500
                Re: My opinion is just that, nothing more. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-11 19:14 -0500
                Re: My opinion is just that, nothing more. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2016-01-11 20:01 -0500
                Re: My opinion is just that, nothing more. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-01-12 07:23 -0600
                Re: My opinion is just that, nothing more. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-01-12 09:27 -0500
                Re: My opinion is just that, nothing more. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-01-12 09:10 -0600
                Re: My opinion is just that, nothing more. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-12 11:14 -0500
                Re: My opinion is just that, nothing more. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-01-12 12:18 -0500
              Re: Renting is cheaper. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-01-11 09:03 -0800
                Re: Be poor and fat. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-01-11 14:24 -0800
        Re: Here trolly, trolly, trolly Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-01-09 07:08 -0500
          Re: Here trolly, trolly, trolly vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-01-09 16:27 +0000
            Re: Here trolly, trolly, trolly owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-01-09 20:53 +0000
            Re: Here trolly, trolly, trolly chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-01-11 07:07 -0600
              Re: Here trolly, trolly, trolly DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-11 11:31 -0500
        Re: Here piggy, piggy, piggy "Henry" <henry@alpha.org> - 2016-01-09 13:56 +0100
        Re: Here trolly, trolly, trolly chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-01-11 07:03 -0600
  Re: Here piggy, piggy, piggy "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2016-01-07 16:21 -0500
    Re: Here piggy, piggy, piggy Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-01-07 20:51 -0500

csiph-web