Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #340011

Re: Vote for your distro ;)

From Slimer <.m@nsn.s>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: Vote for your distro ;)
Date 2016-01-06 20:20 -0500
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <n6kecd$c09$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <ghdnmgie983.afj@rooftop.invalid> <20160106072515.6df83e19@maxa-pc> <tugidlei0.3af@rooftop.invalid> <20160106085033.22476777@maxa-pc> <tyiee9w.390a@rooftop.invalid>

Show all headers | View raw

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 2016-01-06 7:16 PM, owl wrote:
> Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 07:42:46 +0000 (UTC) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 02:54:20 +0000 (UTC) owl
>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 1/5/2016 5:37 PM, Melzzzzz wrote:
>>>>>>> http://fossforce.com/2016/01/its-whats-your-distro-time/
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The results from last year prove, once again, that
>>>>>> "choice!" isn't nearly as important to Linux users as
>>>>>> shitv and RonG and others claim it is.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> http://fossforce.com/2015/03/poll-results-ubuntu-mint-in-near-tie
/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 
Distro  Votes
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Ubuntu  473 Linux Mint      462 openSUSE        417 Arch
>>>>>> 276 Debian  192 Fedora  190
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Top 6 distros got 82% of the votes
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Manjaro         67 CentOS  50 *PCLinuxOS      49 *Gentoo
>>>>>> 36
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Top 10 distros got 90% of the votes.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> This is the 4th survey I've seen with very similar
>>>>>> results.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Assuming 40 million desktop Linux users, these are the
>>>>>> total user counts by distro (based on the voting
>>>>>> proportions):
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Ubuntu  7,678,571 Linux Mint      7,500,000 openSUSE
>>>>>> 6,769,481 Arch    4,480,519 Debian  3,116,883 Fedora
>>>>>> 3,084,416
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Manjaro 1,087,662 CentOS  811,688 *PCLinuxOS
>>>>>> 795,455 *Gentoo 584,416
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> *Slackware      568,182 Mageia  503,247 *Kubuntu
>>>>>> 487,013 elementary      470,779 Antergos        389,610
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Xubuntu 357,143 Bodhi Linux     211,039 Lubuntu 194,805
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Kali Linux      81,169 Linux Lite      81,169 Netrunner
>>>>>> 81,169 CrunchBang      64,935 Korora  64,935
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Chakra  48,701 LMDE    48,701 MX Linux        48,701 
>>>>>> Puppy Linux     48,701 Solydx(k)       48,701
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Deepin  32,468 Funtoo Linux    32,468 KaOS    32,468 LXLE
>>>>>> 32,468 NixOS   32,468 OpenMandriva    32,468 Sabayon
>>>>>> 32,468
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Tiny Core Linux 32,468 Void Linux      32,468
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Total 40,000,000
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> I guess nobody sprung for that Red Hat license.
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> RHEL is for servers.
>>> 
>>> https://www.redhat.com/apps/store/desktop/ "Red Hat Enterprise
>>> Linux for Desktops or Workstation"
>>> 
>>>> CentOS, ditto...
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> survey: "CentOS  811,688"
>>> 
>> 
>> Who would run that on desktop?
>> 
> 
> What's the difference?  Linux is Linux.  Red Hat has just set up a
> business model catering to corporate users, providing a point of
> contact for "official support."  You too can join that club for a
> price.  In fact, there are even two levels of "self-support" -- one
> at $49 and one at $179.  Sounds like a killer deal to me.  I can't
> fathom why RHEL doesn't show up on this bogus survey.

I haven't used Redhat in years. How outdated is it in comparison to
Fedora? I can't imagine that Redhat uses the latest code.


- -- 
Slimer
EFF & OpenMedia member / IFAW, Mozilla & PETA supporter
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWjb1sAAoJEIwFfgf/rr+uGAwIAIGv+PKqOokpTF5616Ofr8yR
dXkKLeS3voVHNoJ1jOSGP9fnnF5/9GnmNUI//HRNlAgQTrZy2F8GdwAzpXeb46pJ
98U1XHETlKzHdmRO5459xCqWQyCN3GpT6kJSVKidirMjh7i2ccSLUO0cH3ijTIvP
FlDUJsKNUrsw8xhoTOQ+mvFyeuy0gMNpOQT34gdfw5PrLbW0y40a4Ue086yVO80W
EhexL/Adg8DjQME3Isb5YNjAgevA/vqodVPq83mnk1rHq/asN5bzdcdn6LXDlQgw
SihDNZUovCkiCxVyZup2oDskJVxcVpXmmXSLic4pqye05shqSRO3/Zk+Oozo2pI=
=1m67
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Vote for your distro ;) Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-01-05 23:37 +0100
  Re: Vote for your distro ;) John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-01-05 15:24 -0800
  Re: Vote for your distro ;) DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-05 20:55 -0500
    Re: Vote for your distro ;) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-01-06 02:54 +0000
      Re: Vote for your distro ;) Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-01-06 07:25 +0100
        Re: Vote for your distro ;) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-01-06 07:42 +0000
          Re: Vote for your distro ;) Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-01-06 08:50 +0100
            Re: Vote for your distro ;) Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-01-06 05:54 -0500
            Re: Vote for your distro ;) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-01-07 00:16 +0000
              Re: Vote for your distro ;) Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-01-07 01:42 +0100
              Re: Vote for your distro ;) Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-01-06 20:20 -0500
                Re: Vote for your distro ;) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-01-07 04:16 +0000
                Re: Vote for your distro ;) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-01-07 15:26 +0000
                Re: Vote for your distro ;) GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-01-07 11:48 -0700
        Re: Vote for your distro ;) Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-01-06 05:43 -0500
          Re: Vote for your distro ;) chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-01-06 06:46 -0600
            Re: Vote for your distro ;) GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-01-06 13:17 -0700
          Re: Vote for your distro ;) DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-07 14:48 -0500
        Re: Vote for your distro ;) GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-01-06 13:15 -0700
      Re: Vote for your distro ;) GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-01-06 13:14 -0700
    Re: Vote for your distro ;) John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-01-05 19:08 -0800
      Re: Vote for your distro ;) Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-01-06 07:22 +0100
        Melzzzzz is a complete Loony posting Loony links and Crap to COLA John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-01-06 05:08 -0800
          Re: Melzzzzz is a complete Loony posting Loony links and Crap to COLA Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-01-06 14:11 +0100
            Re: Melzzzzz is a complete Loony posting Loony links and Crap to COLA John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-01-06 05:51 -0800
          Re: Melzzzzz is a complete Loony posting Loony links and Crap to COLA Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-01-06 21:45 -0800
            Re: Melzzzzz is a complete Loony posting Loony links and Crap to COLA Marti van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> - 2016-01-07 08:17 +0100
            Re: Melzzzzz is a complete Loony posting Loony links and Crap to COLA John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-01-07 03:07 -0800
        Re: Vote for your distro ;) Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-01-06 09:41 -0500
      Re: Vote for your distro ;) DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-07 13:44 -0500
        Re: Vote for your distro ;) John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-01-07 12:36 -0800
  Re: Vote for your distro ;) Vince Vandal <v2@Ce4OrysoXdNcOcOGIAkzQ3WfTYyEQV89dkhLjcQ6cCMIF3Zo5Q49YUyeRjXm.info> - 2016-01-06 04:03 +0000
    Re: Vote for your distro ;) Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-01-06 05:37 -0500
      Re: Vote for your distro ;) Marti van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> - 2016-01-07 05:41 +0100
    Re: Vote for your distro ;) Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-01-06 09:39 -0500
    Re: Vote for your distro ;) DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-07 14:22 -0500
  Re: Vote for your distro ;) Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-01-06 08:44 +0000
    Don't Look now but your Debian Leader just offed himself. John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-01-06 05:52 -0800
      Re: Don't Look now but your Debian Leader just offed himself. Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-01-06 15:37 +0000
        Re: Don't Look now but your Debian Leader just offed himself. John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-01-06 07:46 -0800

csiph-web