Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.electronics.components > #5900
| From | Look165 <look165@numericable.fr> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.electronics.components |
| Subject | Re: Condensateurs |
| Date | 2016-01-05 13:19 +0100 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <n6gc98$sdi$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <n6dmmg$1mj0$1@gioia.aioe.org> <df0h02Faei7U2@mid.individual.net> <n6g443$c4n$1@gioia.aioe.org> <n6gb69$oj7$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
I know and I have used that ( 100uF // with 10nF ceram). But here the goal is to match a value of capa with my "onboard" components ! I repeat that the problem I could face is with the resulting ESR. My actual problem is to make 1200uF with 1000//220 of the same manufacturer and of the same series (I know that 1200//220 don't really make 1220 but a little less). But the ESR will also be somehow in // , what will result ? And if you want to combine this with the parasistic // resistor of the capas... Johann Klammer a écrit : > On 01/05/2016 11:00 AM, Look165 wrote: >> Merci de la réponse, mais c'est côté ESR que je suis inquiet >> >> Hans-Peter Diettrich a écrit : >>> Look165 schrieb: >>> >>>> Si je mets 2 condensateurs chimiques de tension et valeur différentes >>>> en parallèle, est-ce que ça pose un problème , sachant que c'est la >>>> plus basse qui prévaut ? >>> >>> La plus basse tension, oui. >>> >>> DoDi >> > It's quite common to use 'lytics and a small ceramic in parallel, as the > ceramic one will gobble up narrow spikes better because of it's lower > resistance. Impulse currents will be a bit higher there, I guess. >
Back to sci.electronics.components | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Condensateurs Look165 <look165@numericable.fr> - 2016-01-04 12:59 +0100
Re: Condensateurs Look165 <look165@numericable.fr> - 2016-01-04 13:00 +0100
Re: Condensateurs Tilmann Reh <usenet2007nospam@autometer.de> - 2016-01-04 21:34 +0100
Re: Condensateurs Look165 <look165@numericable.fr> - 2016-01-04 21:57 +0100
Re: Condensateurs Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@aol.com> - 2016-01-05 01:27 +0100
Re: Condensateurs Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@aol.com> - 2016-01-05 01:15 +0100
Re: Condensateurs Look165 <look165@numericable.fr> - 2016-01-05 11:00 +0100
Re: Condensateurs Johann Klammer <klammerj@NOSPAM.a1.net> - 2016-01-05 13:01 +0100
Re: Condensateurs Look165 <look165@numericable.fr> - 2016-01-05 13:19 +0100
Re: Condensateurs legg <legg@nospam.magma.ca> - 2016-01-07 09:49 -0500
csiph-web