Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #339406
| From | Barry H <barryum@linuxmail.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: Linux Mint Mate 17.3 in 27 minutes |
| Date | 2016-01-03 11:35 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <n6bif0$5ui$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <n69np0$kva$6@dont-email.me> <c74a5785-c052-4073-a16b-e1bae504576c@googlegroups.com> <n6bcdh$enb$1@dont-email.me> <n6bg5s11tg8@news4.newsguy.com> <n6bhnv$1pj$1@dont-email.me> |
On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 11:20:50 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > Vile Strong wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 09:51:59 -0500, Barry H wrote: >> >>> Problem is once the install is completed the user is left with Linux and >>> it's crude applications. >> >> Once an install of Microsoft Windows is complete, the user is >> left with the flimsy Notepad text editor and a stale media player >> that reports back to MSFT every file that is opened -- not to mention >> a vast horde of unnecessary background services that consume inordinate >> amounts of system resources. >> >> Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha! >> >> Furthermore, Linux applications are only as crude as the person >> who uses them. Need I say more? > > The really funny thing is what a stupid-ass troll named "Hadron" said, > something like: > > "All the best OSS runs on Windows [and Mac] as well." > > He means GIMP, LibreOffice, Wireshark, the vast and powerful suite of GNU > software, Ardour, the large suite of software available at Apache.org, and a > whole lot more. There's even a lot of great cross-platform proprietary > software you can get for Linux, such as Bitwig. Hadron is correct. The BEST OSS DOES run on Windows and Mac. And has better support on those platforms as well. So in that regard, Windows actually has MORE choice than Linux does because a Windows user can choose from say MSOffice or Libreoffice. Or from Photoshop or Gimp. A Linux user can't do that. Great self nuke there Ahlstrom. > "Crude"? No, the only thing crude is the "brain" of "Barry H". He should > be "Barry M" as in "enema". Potty jokes? Grow up.
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Linux Mint Mate 17.3 in 27 minutes ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-01-02 23:50 +0000
Re: Linux Mint Mate 17.3 in 27 minutes John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-01-03 05:07 -0800
Re: Linux Mint Mate 17.3 in 27 minutes Barry H <barryum@linuxmail.org> - 2016-01-03 09:51 -0500
Re: Linux Mint Mate 17.3 in 27 minutes Vile Strong <vs@zen.info> - 2016-01-03 15:53 +0000
Re: Linux Mint Mate 17.3 in 27 minutes Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-01-03 11:20 -0500
Re: Linux Mint Mate 17.3 in 27 minutes Barry H <barryum@linuxmail.org> - 2016-01-03 11:35 -0500
Re: Linux Mint Mate 17.3 in 27 minutes Vile Strong <vs@zen.info> - 2016-01-03 17:33 +0000
Re: Linux Mint Mate 17.3 in 27 minutes Barry H <barryum@linuxmail.org> - 2016-01-03 12:35 -0500
Re: Linux Mint Mate 17.3 in 27 minutes ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-01-03 20:48 +0000
Re: Linux Mint Mate 17.3 in 27 minutes Barry H <barryum@linuxmail.org> - 2016-01-03 15:54 -0500
Re: Linux Mint Mate 17.3 in 27 minutes Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-01-03 14:03 -0500
Re: Linux Mint Mate 17.3 in 27 minutes Barry H <barryum@linuxmail.org> - 2016-01-03 14:35 -0500
Re: Linux Mint Mate 17.3 in 27 minutes chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-01-04 08:18 -0600
STOP responding to Snotface. John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-01-04 07:44 -0800
Re: Linux Mint Mate 17.3 in 27 minutes JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2016-01-03 14:49 -0600
Re: Linux Mint Mate 17.3 in 27 minutes Vile Strong <vs@zen.info> - 2016-01-03 16:48 +0000
Re: Linux Mint Mate 17.3 in 27 minutes Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-01-03 13:58 -0500
Re: Linux Mint Mate 17.3 in 27 minutes JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2016-01-03 14:52 -0600
Re: Linux Mint Mate 17.3 in 27 minutes linuxiac <linuxiac@usa.com> - 2016-01-03 21:22 +0000
Re: Linux Mint Mate 17.3 in 27 minutes owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-01-03 23:51 +0000
Re: Linux Mint Mate 17.3 in 27 minutes Barry H <barryum@linuxmail.org> - 2016-01-03 19:34 -0500
Re: Linux Mint Mate 17.3 in 27 minutes vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-01-04 01:17 +0000
Re: Linux Mint Mate 17.3 in 27 minutes Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-01-03 20:23 -0500
Re: Linux Mint Mate 17.3 in 27 minutes Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-01-03 20:40 -0500
Re: Linux Mint Mate 17.3 in 27 minutes Barry H <barryum@linuxmail.org> - 2016-01-03 20:49 -0500
Re: Linux Mint Mate 17.3 in 27 minutes owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-01-04 05:00 +0000
Re: Linux Mint Mate 17.3 in 27 minutes DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-04 14:40 -0500
Re: Linux Mint Mate 17.3 in 27 minutes owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-01-05 07:13 +0000
Re: Linux Mint Mate 17.3 in 27 minutes "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2016-01-05 14:38 -0500
Re: Linux Mint Mate 17.3 in 27 minutes "Dr. John Grubor" <grubor@grubor.org.invalid> - 2016-01-04 13:01 +0000
Re: Linux Mint Mate 17.3 in 27 minutes owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-01-04 01:49 +0000
Re: Linux Mint Mate 17.3 in 27 minutes ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-01-03 20:45 +0000
Re: Linux Mint Mate 17.3 in 27 minutes ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-01-03 20:52 +0000
Re: Linux Mint Mate 17.3 in 27 minutes ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-01-03 20:56 +0000
Re: Linux Mint Mate 17.3 in 27 minutes DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-04 15:12 -0500
one of the strongest points of Linux Mint is that it supports the Ubuntu/Linux DE Standards John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-01-03 08:03 -0800
Re: Linux Mint Mate 17.3 in 27 minutes Vile Strong <vs@zen.info> - 2016-01-04 02:17 +0000
STOP lying Putz! John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-01-04 04:00 -0800
Re: Linux Mint Mate 17.3 in 27 minutes 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2016-01-04 16:21 +0000
csiph-web