Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.astronomy > #280765
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.astronomy |
| Subject | Re: The Pentagon sucked a 757 into it |
| Date | 2016-01-03 00:11 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <n6aae8$5v1$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <o4gf8b5nmdndu6svrfn7afqfkn9qbr1jog@4ax.com> <n68qq1$kna$1@dont-email.me> <kr6g8bh0ksbmoanfr6cgh818b7gd97ifck@4ax.com> <n69pl4$age$1@dont-email.me> <af60b7ad-1961-46eb-ac61-ff5f0dc83de8@googlegroups.com> |
palsing wrote: > On Saturday, January 2, 2016 at 4:25:39 PM UTC-8, Bast wrote: >> K Wills (Shill #3) wrote: >>> On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 10:38:52 -0500, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Sarah Ehrett wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 1 Jan 2016 09:08:29 -0600, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> "Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message >>>>>> news:cl4d8b5vb06kbp10t7ean9fso8e5n3ra4d@4ax.com... >>>>>>> On Fri, 1 Jan 2016 08:17:16 -0600, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ok, I've seen all sorts of different stories about why no parts >>>>>>>> of a 757 were seen shortly after one was supposed to have his the >>>>>>>> Pentagon. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Roger, there were parts of a 757 on the lawn of the Pentagon. >>>>>> >>>>>> But no wing parts and no parts at all "shortly after" >>>>> >>>>> Yes there were. There was debris on the highway as well. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Huh? >>>> Are you now claiming the "plane" was falling apart as is left it's >>>> original airport,....and left a trail of debris all the way ? >>>> >>>> Sort of like Hansel and Grettle left a trail of bread crumbs so they >>>> could find their way home. >>>> ....You are getting your fairytales mixed up.. >>>> >>> >>> No one has made such a claim. >>> Do you honestly think your deception is going to benefit you? >> >> >> >> >> >> You better read back, as the claim was "There was debris on the >> highway as well." >> QUOTE,UNQUOTE. >> >> So,.... this" plane" was already falling apart and leaving pieces in >> its wake, well before it even supposedly hit the pentagon. >> >> Makes you wonder how a plane losing pieces could still hit a target >> with accuracy. >> ...Or even get there to begin with. >> >> I guess that's just another one of them 9/11 fairytale mysteries we >> just have to accept, with blind faith. > > Bast, you dimwit, just because there was debris on the highway does NOT > mean that it fell off the plane before impact... sheesh, what a moroon! > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_Kh7nLplWo And yet not one picture of this plane debris on a highway ? Or even an explanation of why debris should have been there in the first place ?....How did this plane keep flying if it was already falling apart long before it got near the pentagon ? It's another Christmas miracle, huh ? B'dee,b'dee, b'dee,.....That's all folks. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DH7qq7OjJO8 9/11 was an inside job
Back to alt.astronomy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
The Pentagon sucked a 757 into it "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-01-01 08:17 -0600
Re: The Pentagon sucked a 757 into it Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-01-01 09:53 -0500
Re: The Pentagon sucked a 757 into it "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-01-01 10:06 -0500
Re: The Pentagon sucked a 757 into it "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-01 12:50 -0600
Re: The Pentagon sucked a 757 into it "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-01-01 15:13 -0500
Re: The Pentagon sucked a 757 into it "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-02 05:55 -0600
Re: The Pentagon sucked a 757 into it Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-01-02 07:20 -0500
Re: The Pentagon sucked a 757 into it Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2016-01-02 17:10 +0000
Re: The Pentagon sucked a 757 into it "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-02 12:48 -0600
Re: The Pentagon sucked a 757 into it Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2016-01-02 19:53 +0000
Re: The Pentagon sucked a 757 into it "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-02 16:25 -0600
Re: The Pentagon sucked a 757 into it "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-01-04 18:14 -0500
Re: The Pentagon sucked a 757 into it "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-01-01 09:08 -0600
Re: The Pentagon sucked a 757 into it "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-01-01 18:05 -0600
Re: The Pentagon sucked a 757 into it Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-01-02 07:20 -0500
Re: The Pentagon sucked a 757 into it "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-01-02 10:38 -0500
Re: The Pentagon sucked a 757 into it Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2016-01-02 17:11 +0000
Re: The Pentagon sucked a 757 into it "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-02 12:48 -0600
Re: The Pentagon sucked a 757 into it "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-01-02 19:25 -0500
Re: The Pentagon sucked a 757 into it palsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2016-01-02 17:53 -0800
Re: The Pentagon sucked a 757 into it "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-01-03 00:11 -0500
Re: The Pentagon sucked a 757 into it Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-01-03 13:24 -0500
Re: The Pentagon sucked a 757 into it Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-03 20:36 +0000
Re: The Pentagon sucked a 757 into it Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2016-01-04 22:59 +0000
Re: The Pentagon sucked a 757 into it "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-01-05 11:34 -0500
Re: The Pentagon sucked a 757 into it Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-01-05 13:02 -0500
Re: The Pentagon sucked a 757 into it BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2016-01-05 16:45 -0500
Re: The Pentagon sucked a 757 into it "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-01-06 13:41 -0600
Re: The Pentagon sucked a 757 into it "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-01-06 15:11 -0600
Re: The Pentagon sucked a 757 into it Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-06 13:52 -0800
Re: The Pentagon sucked a 757 into it Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-01-08 13:32 -0500
Re: The Pentagon sucked a 757 into it (Pentagon clock problem) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-01-06 13:46 -0600
Re: The Pentagon sucked a 757 into it "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-06 04:20 -0600
Re: The Pentagon sucked a 757 into it "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-01-02 23:56 -0600
Re: The Pentagon sucked a 757 into it "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-01-03 02:49 -0500
Re: The Pentagon sucked a 757 into it "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2016-01-03 04:08 -0600
Re: The Pentagon sucked a 757 into it mariposas rand mair fheal <mair_fheal@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-03 02:16 -0800
Re: The Pentagon sucked a 757 into it Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-01-03 12:49 -0500
Re: The Pentagon sucked a 757 into it "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-01-03 12:10 -0600
Re: The Pentagon sucked a 757 into it Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-01-03 14:14 -0500
Re: The Pentagon sucked a 757 into it Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2016-01-03 20:30 +0000
Re: The Pentagon sucked a 757 into it Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2016-01-03 13:24 -0500
csiph-web