Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.os.linux > #32981
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.os.linux, alt.os.linux.debian |
| Subject | Re: version control systems |
| Date | 2015-12-30 14:28 -0500 |
| Organization | None |
| Message-ID | <n61b74$fv3$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <n5sr2k$a9e$1@dont-email.me> <deeu36Fpr3rU1@mid.individual.net> <87a8otpbm6.fsf@thumper.dhh.gt.org> <n60aqo$reo$1@dont-email.me> <87mvss6ody.fsf@thumper.dhh.gt.org> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
John Hasler wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > I wrote: >> There is a movement afoot to go to having all binaries built on the >> autobuilder network. However, this will not really change the >> process: it just means that developers will go to uploading >> source-only packages. > > Chris Ahlstrom writes: No I didn't. Crankypuss writes: >> I think that might be an extremely good thing. The GPL requires >> parallelism between a binary and its source, and currently puts the >> onus of supplying the source code on the distributor of the binary. >> If both come from the same source it seems as though it would become >> possible to distribute a modification in binary that is "guaranteed" >> (by merit of the way it's built) to have parallel source code >> available from the same repository as the binary. > > You misunderstand. The Debian source package always contains exactly > the source that was used to build the binary in the binary package. It > is what the binary package was built from, whether by the developer or > an autobuilder. Your guarantee is already there. > -- > John Hasler > jhasler@newsguy.com > Dancing Horse Hill > Elmwood, WI USA -- Q: How many surrealists does it take to change a light bulb? A: Two, one to hold the giraffe, and the other to fill the bathtub with brightly colored machine tools. [Surrealist jokes just aren't my cup of fur. Ed.]
Back to alt.os.linux | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
version control systems crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-28 04:50 -0700
Re: version control systems "J.O. Aho" <user@example.net> - 2015-12-28 13:56 +0100
Re: version control systems John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2015-12-28 08:03 -0600
Re: version control systems crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-28 19:30 -0700
Re: version control systems John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2015-12-28 21:31 -0600
Re: version control systems crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-29 06:59 -0700
Re: version control systems John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2015-12-29 08:47 -0600
Re: version control systems Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-12-29 19:42 -0500
Re: version control systems crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-30 03:01 -0700
Re: version control systems mm0fmf <none@mailinator.com> - 2015-12-30 10:35 +0000
Re: version control systems crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-30 04:41 -0700
Re: version control systems Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2015-12-30 20:19 +0000
Re: version control systems crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-31 02:28 -0700
Re: version control systems Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2015-12-31 20:46 +0000
Re: version control systems crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-31 23:12 -0700
Re: version control systems Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-01-01 11:40 -0500
Re: version control systems Mark Carroll <mtbc@ixod.org> - 2016-01-01 17:16 +0000
Re: version control systems Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-01-01 13:37 -0500
Re: version control systems crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-01-01 15:01 -0700
Re: version control systems Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-01-01 19:19 -0500
Re: version control systems Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2016-01-02 02:45 +0000
Re: version control systems crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-01-02 01:33 -0700
Re: version control systems Kirk_Von_Rockstein <Kirk_Von_Rockstein@nowhere.invalid> - 2016-01-04 00:55 +0000
Re: version control systems crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-01-04 03:38 -0700
Re: version control systems Mark Carroll <mtbc@ixod.org> - 2016-01-04 12:19 +0000
Re: version control systems crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-01-04 11:19 -0700
Re: version control systems Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-12-30 05:58 -0500
Re: version control systems crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-30 04:50 -0700
Re: version control systems Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-12-30 08:02 -0500
Re: version control systems crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-30 06:43 -0700
Re: version control systems mm0fmf <none@mailinator.com> - 2015-12-30 14:42 +0000
Re: version control systems crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-30 12:14 -0700
Re: version control systems John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2015-12-30 07:30 -0600
Re: version control systems crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-30 06:55 -0700
Re: version control systems "J.O. Aho" <user@example.net> - 2015-12-29 09:20 +0100
Re: version control systems crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-29 07:03 -0700
Re: version control systems John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2015-12-29 08:34 -0600
Re: version control systems crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-30 03:17 -0700
Re: version control systems Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-12-30 05:59 -0500
Re: version control systems crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-30 04:53 -0700
Re: version control systems Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2015-12-30 12:07 +0000
Re: version control systems crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-30 05:20 -0700
Re: version control systems Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-12-30 08:05 -0500
Re: version control systems crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-30 06:45 -0700
Re: version control systems Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2015-12-30 13:59 +0000
Re: version control systems John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2015-12-30 08:28 -0600
Re: version control systems crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-30 12:21 -0700
Re: version control systems John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2015-12-30 07:45 -0600
Re: version control systems John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2015-12-30 08:30 -0600
Re: version control systems Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-12-30 14:28 -0500
Re: version control systems Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-12-30 14:28 -0500
Re: version control systems John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2015-12-30 08:15 -0600
Re: version control systems crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-30 12:53 -0700
Re: version control systems mm0fmf <none@mailinator.com> - 2015-12-30 20:33 +0000
csiph-web