Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.os.linux > #32942
| From | crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.os.linux, alt.os.linux.debian |
| Subject | Re: version control systems |
| Date | 2015-12-30 04:50 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <n60g9s$dbb$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <87ege6orr7.fsf@thumper.dhh.gt.org> <n5u3f7$oud$1@dont-email.me> <8760zhpazm.fsf@thumper.dhh.gt.org> <n609sp$oh7$1@dont-email.me> <n60daq$10e$2@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > crankypuss wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> John Hasler wrote: >> >>> crankypuss writes: >>>> So "the archive" is basically a website with custom software. >>> >>> The Debian system is a large, complex, world-wide network. The >>> archive is the database from which the package management software >>> on your >>> machine fetches packages. It has many mirrors around the world, >>> most >>> not under the direct control of Debian. Digital signatures are used >>> to >>> maintain security. The Security archive is an exception: it is >>> never mirrored. >>> >>> Behind the archive is some truly amazing custom software developed >>> over the life of Debian. >> >> LOL, I've seen some software that was "truly amazing" in the sense >> that it worked at all. <g> >> >> I wonder why we still have so many different version control systems; > > After a certain point, a rewrite is easier than wedging in some new > functionality? That's entirely true imo, and it's also proof of-itself that the mechanisms we use to express meaning are insufficiently developed in the sense of not being abstracted enough to obviate the need for wedging-in. > Companies thinking they have a better mousetrap and can make some > money on it? Greed is something one can rely on to obstruct real progress, that's why demonetization is something we ought to do on purpose instead of just letting the paperless economy fall down around us then realizing it wasn't necessary to begin with. > A noted developer who believed that Subversion was shit? I missed that episode of The Drama Queen Show, details? I know nothing about any of the "modern" control systems, they may *all* be shit for all I know. The last [non-homegrown] version control system I've used is Microsoft Visual Source Safe back in the early '90s, and *it* was certainly... somewhat less than perfect. >> they're all about doing one conceptually-simple thing, and even >> though the range of their scaling is large, we ought to have been >> able to have figured out the general case by now. > > I can't decide if you're a lumper or a hair-splitter :-D If you abstract sufficiently it necessitates extreme precision, duh? <G> -- http://totally-portable-software.blogspot.com [Sun Nov 22: "Total Portability is not binary"]
Back to alt.os.linux | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
version control systems crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-28 04:50 -0700
Re: version control systems "J.O. Aho" <user@example.net> - 2015-12-28 13:56 +0100
Re: version control systems John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2015-12-28 08:03 -0600
Re: version control systems crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-28 19:30 -0700
Re: version control systems John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2015-12-28 21:31 -0600
Re: version control systems crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-29 06:59 -0700
Re: version control systems John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2015-12-29 08:47 -0600
Re: version control systems Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-12-29 19:42 -0500
Re: version control systems crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-30 03:01 -0700
Re: version control systems mm0fmf <none@mailinator.com> - 2015-12-30 10:35 +0000
Re: version control systems crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-30 04:41 -0700
Re: version control systems Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2015-12-30 20:19 +0000
Re: version control systems crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-31 02:28 -0700
Re: version control systems Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2015-12-31 20:46 +0000
Re: version control systems crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-31 23:12 -0700
Re: version control systems Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-01-01 11:40 -0500
Re: version control systems Mark Carroll <mtbc@ixod.org> - 2016-01-01 17:16 +0000
Re: version control systems Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-01-01 13:37 -0500
Re: version control systems crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-01-01 15:01 -0700
Re: version control systems Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-01-01 19:19 -0500
Re: version control systems Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2016-01-02 02:45 +0000
Re: version control systems crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-01-02 01:33 -0700
Re: version control systems Kirk_Von_Rockstein <Kirk_Von_Rockstein@nowhere.invalid> - 2016-01-04 00:55 +0000
Re: version control systems crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-01-04 03:38 -0700
Re: version control systems Mark Carroll <mtbc@ixod.org> - 2016-01-04 12:19 +0000
Re: version control systems crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-01-04 11:19 -0700
Re: version control systems Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-12-30 05:58 -0500
Re: version control systems crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-30 04:50 -0700
Re: version control systems Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-12-30 08:02 -0500
Re: version control systems crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-30 06:43 -0700
Re: version control systems mm0fmf <none@mailinator.com> - 2015-12-30 14:42 +0000
Re: version control systems crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-30 12:14 -0700
Re: version control systems John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2015-12-30 07:30 -0600
Re: version control systems crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-30 06:55 -0700
Re: version control systems "J.O. Aho" <user@example.net> - 2015-12-29 09:20 +0100
Re: version control systems crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-29 07:03 -0700
Re: version control systems John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2015-12-29 08:34 -0600
Re: version control systems crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-30 03:17 -0700
Re: version control systems Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-12-30 05:59 -0500
Re: version control systems crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-30 04:53 -0700
Re: version control systems Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2015-12-30 12:07 +0000
Re: version control systems crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-30 05:20 -0700
Re: version control systems Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-12-30 08:05 -0500
Re: version control systems crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-30 06:45 -0700
Re: version control systems Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2015-12-30 13:59 +0000
Re: version control systems John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2015-12-30 08:28 -0600
Re: version control systems crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-30 12:21 -0700
Re: version control systems John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2015-12-30 07:45 -0600
Re: version control systems John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2015-12-30 08:30 -0600
Re: version control systems Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-12-30 14:28 -0500
Re: version control systems Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-12-30 14:28 -0500
Re: version control systems John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2015-12-30 08:15 -0600
Re: version control systems crankypuss <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-12-30 12:53 -0700
Re: version control systems mm0fmf <none@mailinator.com> - 2015-12-30 20:33 +0000
csiph-web