Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #538074

Re: drones

From Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: drones
Date 2015-12-08 22:56 +0100
Organization Good company
Message-ID <n47jhh$loj$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <22362bbb-7117-4962-9d96-f2796227c363@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


Dne 08/12/2015 v 22:29 RichD napsal(a):
> I notice, with these new toy drones, they all use quad 
> rotor design.  Why?
> 
> I never studied aerodynamics, but I'm willing to learn - 
> 

I would say the 1 or 3 of rotors
needs extra rotor to deal with the torsion,
and the 2 rotors in the opposite rotation
does not lead to good enough stability
and control.

4 rotors can deal well with both,
and is easy to manoeuvre to all directions
by the tilting of the whole platform.


-- 
Poutnik ( the Czech word for a wanderer )

Knowledge makes great men humble, but small men arrogant.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

drones RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2015-12-08 13:29 -0800
  Re: drones Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-12-08 22:56 +0100
    Re: drones jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-12-08 22:16 +0000
  Re: drones Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-12-08 14:02 -0800
  Re: drones jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-12-08 22:02 +0000
    Re: drones benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-08 17:49 -0500
      Re: drones jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-12-08 23:48 +0000
        Re: drones benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-08 23:08 -0500
          Re: drones jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-12-09 06:16 +0000
  Re: drones Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-12-08 21:44 -0600
    Re: drones benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-12-08 23:22 -0500

csiph-web