Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #16412
| From | Joe Beanfish <joebeanfish@nospam.duh> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc, alt.os.linux.debian, alt.os.linux.slackware |
| Subject | Re: mc finds more than `find` finds? |
| Date | 2015-11-30 15:59 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <n3hrod$mtt$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <n3at0s$66e$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
On Sat, 28 Nov 2015 00:37:49 +0000, WhoCares wrote:
> I'm still searching for a way to know the pid of eg. the instance of
> `wily` which is has a certain file open.
>
> `pgrep wily` lists all the instances of 'wily'
>
> I was hoping that, I'd find which wily has opened file *CONTROL* by:-
> for PID in `pgrep wily`; do find /proc/$PID -exec grep -l "CONTROL" {} \; >> trace; done
> --- that's supposed to be ONE line ---
>
> Using successive refinement:
> first I used mc to browse /proc/24357 to find a suitable search target.
> Obviously "wily" would be there.
>
> Then I 'confirmed ?':
> find /proc/24357 -exec grep "wily" {} \;
> but that failed, although mc could find several "wily" in /proc/24357
>
> OK, we know that /proc is some kind of spooky FS ?
> So, I copied to /find, [using mc] 2 of the files of /proc/24357 which
> contain "wily", and of course, they are found by:
> find /find -exec grep "wily" {} \; ==
> ./status
> ./environ
>
> How can mc look into /proc/24357 and show the contents if the basic
> `find` can't see it?
Are you looking for file names or file content? Find looks at names
then your exec'd grep will look at content in the found files. If you
want to search by file names do
for PID in `pgrep wily`; do find /proc/$PID -name "CONTROL" -print >> trace; done
or
for PID in `pgrep wily`; do find /proc/$PID -print|grep "CONTROL" >> trace; done
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
mc finds more than `find` finds? WhoCares@gmail.com - 2015-11-28 00:37 +0000
Re: mc finds more than `find` finds? William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2015-11-28 00:52 +0000
Re: mc finds more than `find` finds? Arkadiusz Drabczyk <arkadiusz@domain.invalid> - 2015-11-28 16:15 +0000
Re: mc finds more than `find` finds? William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2015-11-28 17:59 +0000
Re: mc finds more than `find` finds? Teemu Likonen <tlikonen@iki.fi> - 2015-11-28 20:07 +0200
Re: mc finds more than `find` finds? William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2015-11-28 20:44 +0000
Re: mc finds more than `find` finds? Teemu Likonen <tlikonen@iki.fi> - 2015-11-29 12:41 +0200
Re: mc finds more than `find` finds? Arkadiusz Drabczyk <arkadiusz@domain.invalid> - 2015-11-28 18:14 +0000
Re: mc finds more than `find` finds? floyd@apaflo.com (Floyd L. Davidson) - 2015-11-28 11:52 -0900
Re: mc finds more than `find` finds? Martijn Dekker <martijn@inlv.demon.nl> - 2015-11-29 16:35 +0100
Re: mc finds more than `find` finds? floyd@apaflo.com (Floyd L. Davidson) - 2015-11-29 10:49 -0900
Re: mc finds more than `find` finds? Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2015-11-29 20:24 +0000
Re: mc finds more than `find` finds? floyd@apaflo.com (Floyd L. Davidson) - 2015-11-29 14:09 -0900
Re: mc finds more than `find` finds? Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2015-11-30 09:24 +0000
Re: mc finds more than `find` finds? Eef Hartman <E.J.M.Hartman@gmail.com> - 2015-11-30 10:08 +0000
Re: mc finds more than `find` finds? William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2015-11-29 20:07 +0000
Re: mc finds more than `find` finds? Eef Hartman <E.J.M.Hartman@gmail.com> - 2015-11-29 20:10 +0000
Re: mc finds more than `find` finds? no.top.post@gmail.com - 2016-01-04 23:07 +0000
Re: mc finds more than `find` finds? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2016-01-04 23:27 +0000
Re: mc finds more than `find` finds? Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2016-01-04 19:28 -0500
Re: mc finds more than `find` finds? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2016-01-05 14:04 +0000
Re: mc finds more than `find` finds? Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2016-01-05 18:12 +0000
Re: mc finds more than `find` finds? Jerry Peters <jerry@example.invalid> - 2016-01-05 21:05 +0000
Re: mc finds more than `find` finds? marrgol <marrgol@address.invalid> - 2015-11-28 02:22 +0100
Re: mc finds more than `find` finds? Joe Beanfish <joebeanfish@nospam.duh> - 2015-11-30 15:59 +0000
Re: mc finds more than `find` finds? Unknown <dog@gmail.com> - 2016-01-03 12:52 +0000
csiph-web