Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #16381
| From | William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc, alt.os.linux.debian, alt.os.linux.slackware |
| Subject | Re: mc finds more than `find` finds? |
| Date | 2015-11-28 00:52 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <n3atst$8h6$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <n3at0s$66e$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
On 2015-11-28, WhoCares@gmail.com <WhoCares@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm still searching for a way to know the pid of eg. the instance of
> `wily` which is has a certain file open.
>
> `pgrep wily` lists all the instances of 'wily'
>
> I was hoping that, I'd find which wily has opened file *CONTROL* by:-
> for PID in `pgrep wily`; do find /proc/$PID -exec grep -l "CONTROL" {} \; >> trace; done
> --- that's supposed to be ONE line ---
>
> Using successive refinement:
> first I used mc to browse /proc/24357 to find a suitable search target.
> Obviously "wily" would be there.
>
> Then I 'confirmed ?':
> find /proc/24357 -exec grep "wily" {} \;
You need to escape {} (ie \{\}, or '{}' or the shell will interpret it.
> but that failed, although mc could find several "wily" in /proc/24357
egrep -r would work better than your "find" line
Also, while you might find the command line arguments, if wiley opened
the file, I do not think you would find it this way.
>
> OK, we know that /proc is some kind of spooky FS ?
> So, I copied to /find, [using mc] 2 of the files of /proc/24357 which
> contain "wily", and of course, they are found by:
> find /find -exec grep "wily" {} \; ==
> ./status
> ./environ
>
> How can mc look into /proc/24357 and show the contents if the basic
> `find` can't see it?
grep -r "wily" /proc/24357
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
mc finds more than `find` finds? WhoCares@gmail.com - 2015-11-28 00:37 +0000
Re: mc finds more than `find` finds? William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2015-11-28 00:52 +0000
Re: mc finds more than `find` finds? Arkadiusz Drabczyk <arkadiusz@domain.invalid> - 2015-11-28 16:15 +0000
Re: mc finds more than `find` finds? William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2015-11-28 17:59 +0000
Re: mc finds more than `find` finds? Teemu Likonen <tlikonen@iki.fi> - 2015-11-28 20:07 +0200
Re: mc finds more than `find` finds? William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2015-11-28 20:44 +0000
Re: mc finds more than `find` finds? Teemu Likonen <tlikonen@iki.fi> - 2015-11-29 12:41 +0200
Re: mc finds more than `find` finds? Arkadiusz Drabczyk <arkadiusz@domain.invalid> - 2015-11-28 18:14 +0000
Re: mc finds more than `find` finds? floyd@apaflo.com (Floyd L. Davidson) - 2015-11-28 11:52 -0900
Re: mc finds more than `find` finds? Martijn Dekker <martijn@inlv.demon.nl> - 2015-11-29 16:35 +0100
Re: mc finds more than `find` finds? floyd@apaflo.com (Floyd L. Davidson) - 2015-11-29 10:49 -0900
Re: mc finds more than `find` finds? Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2015-11-29 20:24 +0000
Re: mc finds more than `find` finds? floyd@apaflo.com (Floyd L. Davidson) - 2015-11-29 14:09 -0900
Re: mc finds more than `find` finds? Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2015-11-30 09:24 +0000
Re: mc finds more than `find` finds? Eef Hartman <E.J.M.Hartman@gmail.com> - 2015-11-30 10:08 +0000
Re: mc finds more than `find` finds? William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2015-11-29 20:07 +0000
Re: mc finds more than `find` finds? Eef Hartman <E.J.M.Hartman@gmail.com> - 2015-11-29 20:10 +0000
Re: mc finds more than `find` finds? no.top.post@gmail.com - 2016-01-04 23:07 +0000
Re: mc finds more than `find` finds? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2016-01-04 23:27 +0000
Re: mc finds more than `find` finds? Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2016-01-04 19:28 -0500
Re: mc finds more than `find` finds? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2016-01-05 14:04 +0000
Re: mc finds more than `find` finds? Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2016-01-05 18:12 +0000
Re: mc finds more than `find` finds? Jerry Peters <jerry@example.invalid> - 2016-01-05 21:05 +0000
Re: mc finds more than `find` finds? marrgol <marrgol@address.invalid> - 2015-11-28 02:22 +0100
Re: mc finds more than `find` finds? Joe Beanfish <joebeanfish@nospam.duh> - 2015-11-30 15:59 +0000
Re: mc finds more than `find` finds? Unknown <dog@gmail.com> - 2016-01-03 12:52 +0000
csiph-web