Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.comp.freeware > #249018
| From | Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.freeware, alt.computer.security, alt.hacker, alt.privacy.anon-server, comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: The Paris Attacks Were Tragic, but Cryptography Isn't to Blame |
| Date | 2015-11-26 17:09 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <n37vr7$6p1$3@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <90fdcae85b38e5cb9cf0e98b3c74b39a@remailer.cpunk.us> <n34ds7$992$3@dont-email.me> <560e5daaa37f78e6ebb7b4755d912817@hoi-polloi.org> <n374vj$nhm$3@dont-email.me> <80085e628a1e88d1ce6cd6f55e3c3f1a@remailer.paranoici.org> |
Cross-posted to 5 groups.
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On 2015-11-26 4:07 PM, Anonymous wrote: > In article <n374vj$nhm$3@dont-email.me> > Slimer <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >> >> Absolutely. My petition to ban Facebook and SMS messages was only a half >> joke. Facebook should indeed be discouraged because it encourages >> ignorance as well as a complete dissociation from one individual to his >> peers (why meet up when you can chat on Facebook?) > > And that's different from Usenet how? Good point... except that Usenet is essentially dead anyway. Besides, Usenet is useful in that it allows people to get together and speak of topics which are otherwise taboo in society. While you might speak about freeware, computer security and hacking quite freely on Usenet with like-minded people, you'll have a lot of trouble finding people who are willing to talk about those things in real life even amongst the people in your Facebook friends lists. As such, it has a use. -- Slimer EFF & OpenMedia member / IFAW & PETA supporter Wretched Stallman says: "Only YOU can prevent Snit's leftist, atheist propaganda machine." "I am clearly quite ethical / moral." - Snit, lying shamelessly, November 24th, 2015 <D27A422F.6521B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Back to alt.comp.freeware | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
The Paris Attacks Were Tragic, but Cryptography Isn't to Blame Jack Ryan <noreply@remailer.cpunk.us> - 2015-11-25 02:50 -0500
Re: The Paris Attacks Were Tragic, but Cryptography Isn't to Blame Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-25 01:03 -0800
Re: The Paris Attacks Were Tragic, but Cryptography Isn't to Blame Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-25 08:47 -0500
Re: The Paris Attacks Were Tragic, but Cryptography Isn't to Blame Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-25 08:44 -0500
Re: The Paris Attacks Were Tragic, but Cryptography Isn't to Blame Anonymous <anonymous@hoi-polloi.org> - 2015-11-26 13:48 +0100
Re: The Paris Attacks Were Tragic, but Cryptography Isn't to Blame Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-26 09:31 -0500
Re: The Paris Attacks Were Tragic, but Cryptography Isn't to Blame Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2015-11-26 21:07 +0000
Re: The Paris Attacks Were Tragic, but Cryptography Isn't to Blame Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-26 17:09 -0500
Re: The Paris Attacks Were Tragic, but Cryptography Isn't to Blame Euclides Zoto <euclides_zoto@optimum.net> - 2015-11-26 06:24 -0800
Re: The Paris Attacks Were Tragic, but Cryptography Isn't to Blame Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-27 08:42 -0500
Re: The Paris Attacks Were Tragic, but Cryptography Isn't to Blame Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2015-11-28 00:55 +0100
csiph-web