Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #370439
| From | Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: EINSTEIN'S GENERAL RELATIVITY IS OBVIOUSLY ABSURD |
| Date | 2015-11-19 22:00 +0100 |
| Organization | ATMAN - ATM S.A. |
| Message-ID | <n2ld97$lnj$1@node1.news.atman.pl> (permalink) |
| References | (12 earlier) <d1f01415-3220-4200-afc5-4c627c0c954c@googlegroups.com> <a1e90031-0295-4b47-9789-a433cc1e5c6d@googlegroups.com> <a37a9f3d-e93b-44b2-852a-6cb632083075@googlegroups.com> <n2l819$g6h$1@node1.news.atman.pl> <3c882468-e12b-484d-934b-dc58a0589bf3@googlegroups.com> |
Użytkownik "JanPB" napisał w wiadomości grup dyskusyjnych:3c882468-e12b-484d-934b-dc58a0589bf3@googlegroups.com... On Thursday, November 19, 2015 at 11:30:55 AM UTC-8, Maciej Woźniak wrote: > Użytkownik "JanPB" napisał w wiadomości grup > dyskusyjnych:a37a9f3d-e93b-44b2-852a-6cb632083075@googlegroups.com... > > On Wednesday, November 18, 2015 at 11:10:45 PM UTC-8, mlwo...@wp.pl wrote: > > W dniu środa, 18 listopada 2015 22:35:51 UTC+1 użytkownik JanPB napisał: > > > On Wednesday, November 18, 2015 at 1:50:28 AM UTC-8, mlwo...@wp.pl > > > wrote: > > > > W dniu środa, 18 listopada 2015 09:06:42 UTC+1 użytkownik JanPB > > > > napisał: > > > > > On Tuesday, November 17, 2015 at 10:56:16 PM UTC-8, mlwo...@wp.pl > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > W dniu wtorek, 17 listopada 2015 22:24:31 UTC+1 użytkownik JanPB > > > > > > napisał: > > > > > > > On Tuesday, November 17, 2015 at 2:34:32 AM UTC-8, > > > > > > > mlwo...@wp.pl > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > W dniu wtorek, 17 listopada 2015 08:48:13 UTC+1 użytkownik > > > > > > > > JanPB napisał: > > > > > > > > > On Monday, November 16, 2015 at 11:21:26 PM UTC-8, > > > > > > > > > mlwo...@wp.pl wrote: > > > > > > > > > > W dniu wtorek, 17 listopada 2015 02:54:21 UTC+1 > > > > > > > > > > użytkownik > > > > > > > > > > JanPB napisał: > > > > > > > > > > > On Monday, November 16, 2015 at 1:52:23 AM UTC-8, > > > > > > > > > > > mlwo...@wp.pl wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > W dniu poniedziałek, 16 listopada 2015 09:58:27 > > > > > > > > > > > > UTC+1 > > > > > > > > > > > > użytkownik JanPB napisał: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sunday, November 15, 2015 at 11:02:18 PM UTC-8, > > > > > > > > > > > > > mlwo...@wp.pl wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > W dniu poniedziałek, 16 listopada 2015 00:44:11 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UTC+1 użytkownik JanPB napisał: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sunday, November 15, 2015 at 12:38:40 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UTC-8, Maciej Woźniak wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Użytkownik "JanPB" napisał w wiadomości > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > grup > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dyskusyjnych:992803c8-5653-4db5-962e-1a8d927d1153@googlegroups.com... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sunday, November 15, 2015 at 4:48:46 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UTC-8, Maciej Woźniak wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Użytkownik "JanPB" napisał w wiadomości > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > grup > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dyskusyjnych:ddd69259-e17c-41d6-951f-7551c9022b69@googlegroups.com... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sunday, November 15, 2015 at 2:07:38 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UTC-8, Maciej Woźniak wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Użytkownik "JanPB" napisał w wiadomości > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > grup > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dyskusyjnych:0f679c8e-2f71-46e3-ba51-ffd73015746d@googlegroups.com... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sunday, November 15, 2015 at 1:13:41 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UTC-8, Maciej Woźniak wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Użytkownik "JanPB" napisał w > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wiadomości > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > grup > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dyskusyjnych:605463a2-5623-4b57-af65-517e292c25cb@googlegroups.com... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Saturday, November 14, 2015 at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 11:56:52 PM UTC-8, Maciej Woźniak > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Użytkownik "JanPB" napisał w > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wiadomości grup > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dyskusyjnych:1adebf3f-affc-4079-a873-24cb49203b32@googlegroups.com... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The original claim: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > According to The Shit there > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > no deflection, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > light trajectories are > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > straight/geodesic. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > |...is incorrect. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, it is not. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > |It shows confusion between space > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and spacetime > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, it does not. And you're a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > stupid, lying shit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The rest of your post is the usual > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > obsessed monomaniac > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > gobbledygook. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > |Another of Maciej's trait (it's > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > also > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > common among cranks in general > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > NG amply > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > |demonstrates) is to copy selections > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > from the response to their > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > claims > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > then present > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > |those as an "answer" of sorts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > |Note the lack of any content in his > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > latest post otherwise, just > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > flat > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > denials and nothing > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > |about his first, incorrect, claim. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Note the lack of ANY arguments, just > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > flat denials and repeating > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "incorrect" spell. As expected from > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > relativistic moron. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, it's not incorrect, trajectories > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of light in space (don't > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > confuse with spacetime) are, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > according > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to The Shit > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > geodesics/straight lines, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > relativists, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > though obvious morons, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are not stupid enough to treat the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > axioms of their Shit > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > seriously and you are stupid, lying > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > shit, without basic > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > knowledge. And if you have another > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > opinion, show it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What are geodesics of space (don't > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > confuse with spacetime)? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And, about cuttinng selections, poor > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > idiot, you're right, is common > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > here, both among "cranks" and all > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > others; it's impossible to deal > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with posts here without it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > |A. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mortals, praise the incredible wisdom > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a relativistic > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > moron. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > |B. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And bow before the incredible wisdom of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > relativistic > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > moron. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > |C. (I think we are onto something.) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And praise The Shit, that created > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > relativistic moron and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > gave him his incredible wisdom. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > |D. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For those not reading carefully: I asked > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > halfbrain, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > what are geodesics of space (don't confuse > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with spacetime) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in his theory. These are his answers. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > E. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Also: removing a misattribution] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For those not reading carefully: I asked this > > > > > > > > > > > > > > halfbrain, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > what are geodesics of space (don't confuse with > > > > > > > > > > > > > > spacetime) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in his theory. These are his answers. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > F. > > > > > > > > > > > > :) > > > > > > > > > > > > For those not reading carefully: I asked this > > > > > > > > > > > > halfbrain, > > > > > > > > > > > > what are geodesics of space (don't confuse with > > > > > > > > > > > > spacetime) > > > > > > > > > > > > in his theory. These are his answers. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > G. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For those not reading carefully: I asked this halfbrain, > > > > > > > > > > what are geodesics of space (don't confuse with > > > > > > > > > > spacetime) > > > > > > > > > > in his theory. These are his answers. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > H. > > > > > > > > For those not reading carefully: I asked this halfbrain, > > > > > > > > what are geodesics of space (don't confuse with spacetime) > > > > > > > > in his theory. These are his answers. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I. > > > > > > For those not reading carefully: I asked this halfbrain, > > > > > > what are geodesics of space (don't confuse with spacetime) > > > > > > in his theory. These are his answers. > > > > > > > > > > J. > > > > > > > > For those not reading carefully: I asked this halfbrain, > > > > what are geodesics of space (don't confuse with spacetime) > > > > in his theory. These are his answers. > > > > > > K. > > For those not reading carefully: I asked this halfbrain, > > what are geodesics of space (don't confuse with spacetime) > > in his theory. These are his answers. > > For those not reading carefully: I asked this halfbrain, > what are geodesics of space (don't confuse with spacetime) > in his theory. These are his answers. |M. For those not reading carefully: I asked this halfbrain, what are geodesics of space (don't confuse with spacetime) in his theory. These are his answers.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
EINSTEIN'S GENERAL RELATIVITY IS OBVIOUSLY ABSURD Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-12 02:34 -0800
Re: PENTCHO'S UNDERSTANDING OF EINSTEIN'S GENERAL RELATIVITY IS OBVIOUSLY ABSURD Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-12 05:03 -0800
Re: EINSTEIN'S GENERAL RELATIVITY IS OBVIOUSLY ABSURD mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2015-11-12 05:43 -0800
Re: EINSTEIN'S GENERAL RELATIVITY IS OBVIOUSLY ABSURD JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-11-12 12:08 -0800
Re: EINSTEIN'S GENERAL RELATIVITY IS OBVIOUSLY ABSURD mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2015-11-12 23:29 -0800
Re: EINSTEIN'S GENERAL RELATIVITY IS OBVIOUSLY ABSURD paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2015-11-13 02:55 -0800
Re: EINSTEIN'S GENERAL RELATIVITY IS OBVIOUSLY ABSURD mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2015-11-13 03:45 -0800
Re: EINSTEIN'S GENERAL RELATIVITY IS OBVIOUSLY ABSURD JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 13:33 -0800
Re: EINSTEIN'S GENERAL RELATIVITY IS OBVIOUSLY ABSURD Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-11-14 23:17 +0100
Re: EINSTEIN'S GENERAL RELATIVITY IS OBVIOUSLY ABSURD JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 16:50 -0800
Re: EINSTEIN'S GENERAL RELATIVITY IS OBVIOUSLY ABSURD Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-11-15 08:56 +0100
Re: EINSTEIN'S GENERAL RELATIVITY IS OBVIOUSLY ABSURD JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-11-15 00:17 -0800
Re: EINSTEIN'S GENERAL RELATIVITY IS OBVIOUSLY ABSURD Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-11-15 10:13 +0100
Re: EINSTEIN'S GENERAL RELATIVITY IS OBVIOUSLY ABSURD JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-11-15 02:05 -0800
Re: EINSTEIN'S GENERAL RELATIVITY IS OBVIOUSLY ABSURD Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-11-15 11:07 +0100
Re: EINSTEIN'S GENERAL RELATIVITY IS OBVIOUSLY ABSURD JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-11-15 02:15 -0800
Re: EINSTEIN'S GENERAL RELATIVITY IS OBVIOUSLY ABSURD Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-11-15 13:48 +0100
Re: EINSTEIN'S GENERAL RELATIVITY IS OBVIOUSLY ABSURD kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-15 08:35 -0500
Re: EINSTEIN'S GENERAL RELATIVITY IS OBVIOUSLY ABSURD Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-11-15 14:49 +0100
Re: EINSTEIN'S GENERAL RELATIVITY IS OBVIOUSLY ABSURD JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-11-15 09:48 -0800
Re: EINSTEIN'S GENERAL RELATIVITY IS OBVIOUSLY ABSURD Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-11-15 21:38 +0100
Re: EINSTEIN'S GENERAL RELATIVITY IS OBVIOUSLY ABSURD JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-11-15 15:44 -0800
Re: EINSTEIN'S GENERAL RELATIVITY IS OBVIOUSLY ABSURD mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2015-11-15 23:02 -0800
Re: EINSTEIN'S GENERAL RELATIVITY IS OBVIOUSLY ABSURD JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-11-16 00:58 -0800
Re: EINSTEIN'S GENERAL RELATIVITY IS OBVIOUSLY ABSURD mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2015-11-16 01:52 -0800
Re: EINSTEIN'S GENERAL RELATIVITY IS OBVIOUSLY ABSURD JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-11-16 17:54 -0800
Re: EINSTEIN'S GENERAL RELATIVITY IS OBVIOUSLY ABSURD mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2015-11-16 23:21 -0800
Re: EINSTEIN'S GENERAL RELATIVITY IS OBVIOUSLY ABSURD JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-11-16 23:48 -0800
Re: EINSTEIN'S GENERAL RELATIVITY IS OBVIOUSLY ABSURD mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2015-11-17 02:34 -0800
Re: EINSTEIN'S GENERAL RELATIVITY IS OBVIOUSLY ABSURD JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-11-17 13:24 -0800
Re: EINSTEIN'S GENERAL RELATIVITY IS OBVIOUSLY ABSURD mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2015-11-17 22:56 -0800
Re: EINSTEIN'S GENERAL RELATIVITY IS OBVIOUSLY ABSURD JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-11-18 00:06 -0800
Re: EINSTEIN'S GENERAL RELATIVITY IS OBVIOUSLY ABSURD mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2015-11-18 01:50 -0800
Re: EINSTEIN'S GENERAL RELATIVITY IS OBVIOUSLY ABSURD JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-11-18 13:35 -0800
Re: EINSTEIN'S GENERAL RELATIVITY IS OBVIOUSLY ABSURD mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2015-11-18 23:10 -0800
Re: EINSTEIN'S GENERAL RELATIVITY IS OBVIOUSLY ABSURD JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-11-19 11:19 -0800
Re: EINSTEIN'S GENERAL RELATIVITY IS OBVIOUSLY ABSURD Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-11-19 20:30 +0100
Re: EINSTEIN'S GENERAL RELATIVITY IS OBVIOUSLY ABSURD JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-11-19 12:30 -0800
Re: EINSTEIN'S GENERAL RELATIVITY IS OBVIOUSLY ABSURD Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-11-19 22:00 +0100
Re: EINSTEIN'S GENERAL RELATIVITY IS OBVIOUSLY ABSURD Jack Monaco <jacksh@umbertopal.org> - 2015-11-19 20:09 +0000
Re: EINSTEIN'S GENERAL RELATIVITY IS OBVIOUSLY ABSURD JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-11-19 12:28 -0800
Re: EINSTEIN'S GENERAL RELATIVITY IS OBVIOUSLY ABSURD Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-11-19 21:31 +0100
Re: EINSTEIN'S GENERAL RELATIVITY IS OBVIOUSLY ABSURD JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-11-19 14:13 -0800
Re: EINSTEIN'S GENERAL RELATIVITY IS OBVIOUSLY ABSURD Jack Monaco <jacksh@umbertopal.org> - 2015-11-19 21:37 +0000
Re: EINSTEIN'S GENERAL RELATIVITY IS OBVIOUSLY ABSURD Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-14 07:17 -0800
Re: PENTCHO VALEV IS OBVIOUSLY ABSURD Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-14 07:55 -0800
Re: EINSTEIN'S GENERAL RELATIVITY IS OBVIOUSLY ABSURD Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-18 04:11 -0800
Re: EINSTEIN'S GENERAL RELATIVITY IS OBVIOUSLY ABSURD JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-11-18 13:35 -0800
csiph-web