Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | BartC <bc@freeuk.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: Array manipulation techniques |
| Date | 2015-11-16 11:10 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <n2cdf0$rmu$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <b17e757e-d81b-480c-90a9-ae498778fda5@googlegroups.com> <5sai4b15uitn38qkrbi06moqfiev00n0td@4ax.com> <ebff76d0-711d-4bf0-9094-3817f340d5d5@googlegroups.com> <b74b1470-2a8e-400a-93db-975a6c6b379f@googlegroups.com> <n2bvpu$es0$1@dont-email.me> |
On 16/11/2015 07:17, Richard Heathfield wrote: > On 16/11/15 07:00, asetofsymbols@gmail.com wrote: >> This seems right: >> #define u8 unsigned char > > Already it isn't. > > If you want a new name for an existing type, use typedef, not #define. > And pick a meaningful name. u8 is not a good synonym for unsigned char. What about 'byte'? You see u8, u16, u32 etc all the time and it is perfectly obvious what they mean or what they are intended to represent. So, given that 'unsigned char' is too long-winded and unwieldy, that 'unsigned_char' would be pointless, and sill unwieldy, and 'uint8_t' is too ugly, I'd be interested in what typedef name /you/ would choose rather than 'unsigned char'. And would your choice still be the same is this was needed for storing small numbers between, say, 0 and 255, rather than actual characters. -- Bartc
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Array manipulation techniques "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-11-15 09:44 +0100
Re: Array manipulation techniques Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2015-11-15 01:56 -0800
Re: Array manipulation techniques Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-11-15 10:43 -0800
Re: Array manipulation techniques Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2015-11-15 10:54 -0800
Re: Array manipulation techniques Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-16 08:13 +1300
Re: Array manipulation techniques Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2015-11-15 12:50 -0800
Re: Array manipulation techniques Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2015-11-15 14:07 -0600
Re: Array manipulation techniques Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2015-11-15 15:12 -0800
Re: Array manipulation techniques glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-11-15 09:57 +0000
Re: Array manipulation techniques Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-15 03:02 -0800
Array manipulation techniques asetofsymbols@gmail.com - 2015-11-15 12:02 -0800
Array manipulation techniques asetofsymbols@gmail.com - 2015-11-15 12:05 -0800
Array manipulation techniques asetofsymbols@gmail.com - 2015-11-15 12:28 -0800
Re: Array manipulation techniques Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2015-11-15 12:48 -0800
Re: Array manipulation techniques Geoff <geoff@invalid.invalid> - 2015-11-15 17:05 -0800
Re: Array manipulation techniques Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-11-15 19:09 -0800
Re: Array manipulation techniques asetofsymbols@gmail.com - 2015-11-15 22:52 -0800
Re: Array manipulation techniques asetofsymbols@gmail.com - 2015-11-15 23:00 -0800
Re: Array manipulation techniques Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-11-16 07:17 +0000
Re: Array manipulation techniques asetofsymbols@gmail.com - 2015-11-15 23:41 -0800
Re: Array manipulation techniques Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-11-16 07:47 +0000
Re: Array manipulation techniques David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-11-16 09:51 +0100
Re: Array manipulation techniques Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-11-16 16:49 +0000
Re: Array manipulation techniques BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-11-16 11:10 +0000
Re: Array manipulation techniques Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-16 03:33 -0800
Re: Array manipulation techniques Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-11-16 13:09 +0000
Re: Array manipulation techniques Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-16 05:59 -0800
Re: Array manipulation techniques Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-11-16 15:22 +0000
Re: Array manipulation techniques Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-11-16 16:57 +0000
Re: Array manipulation techniques Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-11-16 10:29 -0800
Re: Array manipulation techniques David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-11-17 09:02 +0100
Re: Array manipulation techniques BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-11-17 10:46 +0000
Re: Array manipulation techniques Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-11-17 07:05 -0800
Re: Array manipulation techniques David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-11-17 16:47 +0100
Re: Array manipulation techniques supercat@casperkitty.com - 2015-11-17 12:33 -0800
Development Best Practices and C "nomenclature" Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2015-11-16 12:15 -0500
Re: Development Best Practices and C "nomenclature" Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-16 10:33 -0800
Re: Development Best Practices and C "nomenclature" asetofsymbols@gmail.com - 2015-11-16 10:51 -0800
Re: Development Best Practices and C "nomenclature" "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-11-16 20:14 +0100
Re: Development Best Practices and C "nomenclature" asetofsymbols@gmail.com - 2015-11-16 11:28 -0800
Re: Development Best Practices and C "nomenclature" "Morten W. Petersen" <morphex@gmail.com> - 2015-11-17 00:20 +0100
Re: Development Best Practices and C "nomenclature" David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-11-17 10:03 +0100
Re: Development Best Practices and C "nomenclature" Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-11-17 08:54 -0800
Re: Development Best Practices and C "nomenclature" glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-11-17 20:12 +0000
Re: Development Best Practices and C "nomenclature" Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2015-11-17 23:38 -0600
Re: Development Best Practices and C "nomenclature" glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-11-18 08:22 +0000
Re: Development Best Practices and C "nomenclature" Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-11-16 20:25 +0000
Re: Development Best Practices and C "nomenclature" Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2015-11-16 16:20 -0500
Re: Development Best Practices and C "nomenclature" Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-16 13:28 -0800
Re: Development Best Practices and C "nomenclature" Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-11-16 21:30 +0000
Re: Development Best Practices and C "nomenclature" asetofsymbols@gmail.com - 2015-11-16 14:38 -0800
Re: Development Best Practices and C "nomenclature" asetofsymbols@gmail.com - 2015-11-16 14:52 -0800
Re: Development Best Practices and C "nomenclature" asetofsymbols@gmail.com - 2015-11-17 22:51 -0800
Re: Development Best Practices and C "nomenclature" Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-11-18 06:59 +0000
Re: Development Best Practices and C "nomenclature" Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-11-16 20:24 +0000
Re: Development Best Practices and C "nomenclature" David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-11-17 09:55 +0100
Re: Development Best Practices and C "nomenclature" raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2015-11-17 23:00 +0000
Re: Development Best Practices and C "nomenclature" raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2015-11-17 22:55 +0000
Re: Development Best Practices and C "nomenclature" Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-18 12:07 +1300
Re: Development Best Practices and C "nomenclature" James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-11-17 18:45 -0500
Re: Development Best Practices and C "nomenclature" David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-11-18 15:50 +0100
Re: Development Best Practices and C "nomenclature" Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-11-18 08:39 -0800
Re: Development Best Practices and C "nomenclature" Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-11-20 13:07 -0800
Re: Development Best Practices and C "nomenclature" Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-11-20 14:16 -0800
[OT] Re: Development Best Practices and C "nomenclature" Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2015-11-20 17:30 -0500
Re: [OT] Re: Development Best Practices and C "nomenclature" Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-20 19:29 -0800
Re: [OT] Re: Development Best Practices and C "nomenclature" raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2015-11-21 22:44 +0000
Re: Development Best Practices and C "nomenclature" jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2015-11-22 00:09 +0100
Re: Development Best Practices and C "nomenclature" Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-11-21 15:57 -0800
Re: Development Best Practices and C "nomenclature" James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-11-21 20:49 -0500
Re: Development Best Practices and C "nomenclature" Rosario19 <Ros@invalid.invalid> - 2015-11-25 10:13 +0100
Re: Development Best Practices and C "nomenclature" "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-25 18:58 -0500
Re: Development Best Practices and C "nomenclature" Rosario19 <Ros@invalid.invalid> - 2015-11-26 12:13 +0100
Re: Development Best Practices and C "nomenclature" "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-26 07:22 -0500
Re: Development Best Practices and C "nomenclature" glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-11-22 14:51 +0000
Re: Development Best Practices and C "nomenclature" "Charles Richmond" <numerist@aquaporin4.com> - 2015-11-23 15:53 -0600
Re: Development Best Practices and C "nomenclature" Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-11-18 08:55 -0800
Re: Development Best Practices and C "nomenclature" Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-11-18 09:17 -0800
Re: Development Best Practices and C "nomenclature" James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-11-18 13:19 -0500
Re: Development Best Practices and C "nomenclature" raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2015-11-20 11:32 +0000
Re: Development Best Practices and C "nomenclature" Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-11-20 13:17 -0800
Re: Development Best Practices and C "nomenclature" glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-11-21 07:08 +0000
Re: Development Best Practices and C "nomenclature" Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-11-22 13:52 -0800
Re: Array manipulation techniques Geoff <geoff@invalid.invalid> - 2015-11-15 17:03 -0800
Re: Array manipulation techniques Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2015-11-15 15:09 -0500
Re: Array manipulation techniques Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-11-15 21:47 +0000
Re: Array manipulation techniques Geoff <geoff@invalid.invalid> - 2015-11-15 17:02 -0800
Re: Array manipulation techniques Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-11-16 10:44 -0800
Re: Array manipulation techniques asetofsymbols@gmail.com - 2015-11-16 11:13 -0800
Re: Array manipulation techniques Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-11-16 11:57 -0800
Re: Array manipulation techniques Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-17 10:30 +1300
Re: Array manipulation techniques Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2015-11-17 08:11 -0500
Re: Array manipulation techniques BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-11-17 13:24 +0000
Re: Array manipulation techniques Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-11-20 13:09 -0800
Re: Array manipulation techniques Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2015-11-20 16:20 -0500
csiph-web