Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #529982
| From | Jeffrey Bannister <jbann@highadvancedscience.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Arch and scaffold: How Einstein found his field equations |
| Date | 2015-11-02 19:41 +0000 |
| Organization | Distributed Iinstantiation |
| Message-ID | <n18e89$2q1$2@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <idKdnUiTVPxDEqrLnZ2dnUU7-SUAAAAA@giganews.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Sam Wormley wrote: > Arch and scaffold: How Einstein found his field equations >> http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/magazine/physicstoday/ article/68/11/10.1063/PT.3.2979?utm_source=Physics% 20Today&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=6339900_Physics%20Today%3A%20The% 20week%20in%20Physics%2026-30%20October&dm_i=1Y69,3RVWC,E1PPN7,DLFXW,1 > > >> In his later years, Einstein often claimed that he had obtained the >> field equations of general relativity by choosing the mathematically >> most natural candidate. His writings during the period in which he >> developed general relativity tell a different story. Hahahahaaa >> Page proofs of Hilbert’s paper, which was not published until March >> 1916, surfaced in the late 1990s. An analysis of them14 shows that >> Einstein need not have worried about Hilbert in November 1915. In >> important ways, the theory presented in the page proofs is closer to >> the Entwurf theory than to general relativity in its final form. It has >> the same structure as the version of the Entwurf theory published in >> the review article of November 1914. It is true that Hilbert chose as >> his Lagrangian the Riemann curvature scalar, which is the gravitational >> part of the Lagrangian for the generally covariant Einstein field >> equations. At that point, however, Hilbert accepted Einstein’s hole >> argument against generally covariant field equations and imposed a >> coordinate restriction via a relation he suggestively called the energy >> theorem. So the actual field equations in the page proofs are not >> generally covariant. The restriction was dropped in the published >> version of the paper. hahahaha, thanks. >> Despite Einstein’s efforts to hide the scaffold, the arch unveiled in >> the first November paper still shows clear traces of it. Einstein >> wanted to display its mathematical splendor, but his structure was not >> quite up to code yet. To prevent a violation of energy–momentum >> conservation from bringing it down, he had to prop it up with some >> lumber from the Entwurf scaffold, a support beam cut to the size of >> unimodular transformations. Unfortunately, that support beam did not >> leave enough room for another critical piece of scaffolding, the >> restriction to unimodular coordinates. Only with that restriction in >> place could one fully appreciate the magnificence of the arch as a >> structure that looks the same from all angles even though during >> construction it could only be viewed from some. To make room for >> unimodular coordinates, Einstein brought in the heavy machinery of the >> electromagnetic worldview, then realized he did not need it. What he >> needed instead was an extra term on the right-hand side of the field >> equations with the trace of the energy–momentum tensor. That trace term >> turned out to be the keystone of his arch. hihihihii >> That is how Einstein left the construction site in November 1915. >> During the next few months, he cleared away the debris of the first two >> November 1915 papers, which resulted in the first self-contained >> exposition of the new theory, published in May 1916 (CPAE 6; 30).15 In >> November 1916 he finally lifted the restriction to unimodular >> coordinates (CPAE 6; 41). The arch was self-supporting at last, a >> marvelous sight to behold for generations of physicists to come. He was about to step in the Divergent Matter region, and got frightened. They we barely accept a curved spacetime, but a Divergent Matter they never would accept especially in those day.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Arch and scaffold: How Einstein found his field equations Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 10:31 -0600
Re: Arch and scaffold: How Einstein found his field equations gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-11-02 10:57 -0600
Re: Arch and scaffold: How Einstein found his field equations Jeffrey Bannister <jbann@highadvancedscience.org> - 2015-11-02 19:41 +0000
Re: Arch and scaffold: How Einstein found his field equations Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-02 20:07 +0000
Re: Arch and scaffold: How Einstein found his field equations xxein1@att.net - 2015-11-04 18:11 -0800
Psalms 46 noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-11-05 20:08 -0800
Re: Arch and scaffold: How Einstein found his field equations "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-11-06 05:23 -0800
languages of the mother tongue(s noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-11-07 18:17 -0800
csiph-web