Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.astronomy > #278335
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! |
| Date | 2015-10-22 23:38 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <n0bodt$3c0$2@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (6 earlier) <r47h2bt05phkc5cr02r5rljs70m32vdpop@4ax.com> <08gi2b95plaf8j82s9vvdcte5g0u9f7jcp@4ax.com> <n0bj6s$ctr$1@dont-email.me> <n0bmgt$sps$1@dont-email.me> <iNCdnQMtb_Fa_rTLnZ2dnUU7-UednZ2d@giganews.com> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
On 22/10/2015 23:30, Rocky wrote: > "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message > news:n0bmgt$sps$1@dont-email.me... >> On 22/10/2015 22:09, Bast wrote: >>> Government Shill #2 wrote: >>>> On Thu, 22 Oct 2015 04:22:12 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 21:02:39 -0400, "AMUN" <antispam@sparmmstop.org> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Government Shill #2 wrote: >>>>>>> On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 20:22:09 -0400, "AMUN" <antispam@sparmmstop.org> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What is the matter with you, you dumb cunt ? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> " nothing like that anywhere around, which would indicate that the >>>>>>>> entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon and then caused >>>>>>>> the side to collapse. " >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Learn English. It can not be any more clear what he said, "no >>>>>>>> plane ", ANYWHERE. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "... which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side >>>>>>> of the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse. " >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Right there, in your quote. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It is you reading ability which is faulty, not Sarah's. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Shill #2 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Are you EVER a dumb cunt. >>>>> >>>>> Hi Bast. >>>>> >>>>>> Editing my post does not impress anyone. >>>>>> Nor deleting the link to the video, so that others can easily judge >>>>>> for themselves >>>>>> >>>>>>>> 9/11 Pentagon Reality Check 16: CNN's JAMIE MCINTYRE >>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OHeYFTPG4KQ >>>>>> >>>>>> " nothing like that anywhere around, which would indicate that the >>>>>> entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon and then caused >>>>>> the side to collapse. " >>>>>> >>>>>> How stupid can you be ? >>>>> >>>>> " the entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon and then >>>>> caused the side to collapse. " >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Everyone else has known for years that 9/11 was a false flag.. >>>>>> >>>>>> And for both this account and that "sarah" should stop posting from >>>>>> the same IP, >>>>> >>>>> We don't have the same IP Bast. We're not even in the same time >>>>> zones, you loopy lesbian. >>>> >>>> We're not even in the same continent or hemisphere. :-) >>>> >>>> Shill #2 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> What are you flapping your paranoid gums about ? >>> Arc Michael has me figured out as Rocky and saul and a few others,.... >>> Jeez,.... >>> >>> Most of the world now accepts that 9/11 was an inside job. >> >> You have proof of this? > > ROTFLMAO when it is the other way around. No it's not, why do you continue to try to evade questions in this way? > > You have no proof whatsoever that Flight 93 should be able to completely > disappear in dirt at Pranksville, PA. > Indeed. > You have no proof that a 757 should be able to fold it's wings back like a > bird going into a birdhouse just like the 757 was supposed to have done at > the Pentagon. > And what has that to do with my question? > And you have no proof whatsoever that the two flights that flew into the > Twin Towers were nothing more than very very cheap CGIs that didn't loose > any speed or parts. Or why they skipped along and showed off that they > could continue to fly with disappearing wings. <G> > And what has that to do with my question? > And above all you have no proof whatsoever that the following is consistent > with a "Kerosene Collapse." <G> > http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg > And what has that to do with my question? > And do not forget there is a reason why NIST never claimed the Twin Towers > were a Pancake Collapse and yet a lot of the Television set worshippers like > yourself or Popular Mechanic will still try to claim the Twin Towers were a > pancake collapse. > >>> So your side is not doing your jobs at all. And it's only a matter of >>> time >>> until you get terminated by your bosses. >>> They didn't lose any sleep over snuffing out 3000 people on 9/11, and >>> millions since, so your pathetic existence doesn't even count at all > > The following actually says it all when you realize the reason there are no > cranes or people in the photo is because nobody was allowed at GZ the first > two days after 9/11 because the radiation level was so damn high. > http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg > > Rocky > > --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
Back to alt.astronomy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-20 19:34 -0400
Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2015-10-20 16:49 -0700
Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-20 20:14 -0400
Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-21 15:51 -0500
Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-21 20:07 -0400
Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! "AMUN" <antispam@sparmmstop.org> - 2015-10-21 20:22 -0400
Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 11:33 +1100
Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! "AMUN" <antispam@sparmmstop.org> - 2015-10-21 21:02 -0400
Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 12:20 +1100
Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-10-22 07:49 -0700
Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-22 10:57 -0400
Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 19:06 -0500
Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-10-22 19:19 -0700
Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 04:28 -0500
Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-23 06:02 -0400
Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-10-23 09:10 -0700
Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 18:43 -0500
Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 18:43 -0500
Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-23 20:30 -0400
Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-23 23:22 -0400
Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-24 07:03 -0400
Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-24 10:10 -0400
Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-24 15:04 -0500
Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-24 03:58 -0500
Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-24 07:22 -0400
Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-24 10:05 -0400
Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-24 15:04 -0500
Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-22 04:22 -0400
Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-10-22 09:46 -0700
Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 07:03 +1100
Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-22 17:09 -0400
Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-22 23:06 +0100
Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-22 17:30 -0500
Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-22 23:38 +0100
Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 19:06 -0500
Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-22 21:23 -0400
Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-23 06:38 +0100
Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-23 05:05 -0400
Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-23 18:16 +0100
Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-23 19:37 -0400
Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 19:06 -0500
Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 12:00 +1100
Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-23 10:26 -0400
Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-23 10:09 -0400
Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-23 19:34 -0400
Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-21 21:11 -0400
Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! Government Shill #2 <gov.shill@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 12:22 +1100
Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-22 04:23 -0400
Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-22 10:15 -0400
Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-22 21:35 -0400
Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-22 08:57 -0400
Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-22 04:23 -0400
Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-22 04:21 -0400
Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 04:16 -0500
Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-24 11:18 -0500
Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-24 11:24 -0500
Re: 9/11 : Pentagon Was Hit by a Cruise Missile - Proof! Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-10-23 09:21 -0700
csiph-web