Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.astronomy > #278303

Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai

From "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
Newsgroups alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, sci.physics
Subject Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai
Date 2015-10-22 10:06 -0400
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <n0aqcl$629$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <3d0c2b5163g1ahp80hp59on4o461eqo6gi@4ax.com> <n05hcd$crh$1@dont-email.me> <bard2bd8hkc81jmdva3jbeh8bapvj39jem@4ax.com> <n083t7$3vg$1@dont-email.me> <44ah2b1hic63gm9rtluhks4us6u6b32ic2@4ax.com>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 09:30:13 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>> K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>>> On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 10:01:48 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 19:53:45 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai
>>>>>>>>  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYw3df-Nslk
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Of course the US doesn't care about winning a War on Terror
>>>>>>>> because they started it as proven by the lack of crash dynamics
>>>>>>>> of the two alleged jets in Nuke York City meaning they were just
>>>>>>>> CGI and the fact the following is not consistent with a Kerosene
>>>>>>>> Collapse but it is consistent with Nuclear Demolitions where
>>>>>>>> people had to stay out of the site for 2 days when the radiation
>>>>>>>>  was the highest.
>>>>>>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Incoherent babble of someone desperately in need of professional
>>>>>>> help.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The US government/bankster stoolies needed a new excuse to steal
>>>>>> tax dollars outright, get their central banks in control of the
>>>>>> economies of the countries they do not yet control.
>>>>>> What better cover than to claim BOOGY-MEN all over the worldd, that
>>>>>> can't be identified, and they can claim to fight in all the no
>>>>>> central bank countries
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Aren't you still afraid of boogy-men hijackers flying a plane into
>>>>>> another building like 9/11  ??????
>>>>>> So you let TSA gab your privates. Despite the fact that in all the
>>>>>> years TSA has been doing that, not one terrorist has been found.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BOO !!!
>>>>>
>>>>>     Either you're doing an Oscar worthy performance of someone who
>>>>> is extremely delusional, or you are extremely delusional.
>>>>
>>>> Nevermind the insults.
>>>
>>>     If you find the truth insulting, maybe you should take action to
>>> change the truth.
>>>
>>>> Actually prove me worng,....I dare you.
>>>
>>>     It befalls you to prove your claims correct. It does not befall
>>> me to prove them incorrect.
>>>
>>>> ....And wait until you see what the TPP is going to bring you.
>>>>
>>>
>>>     TPP?
>>>
>>>> But you go ahead and keep supporting the bankster run puppets, and
>>>> see if you get anything out of it.
>>>
>>>     I'll stick with what I'm doing now. It's worked very well for me
>>> to this point. There's no reason to believe it won't continue.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> I'm not really surprised you have no idea what  TPP is.
>> .....It's not in your  prepared government scripts.
>>
>> And heaven forbid you have to actually THINK about something.
>
>     I note you couldn't tell me. Clearly it's something your
> delusional mind made up.







I shouldn't HAVE to tell you.
That's the point.
An EXPERT on EVERYTHING like you claim to be, should have been born with 
that knowledge.


Of course the government doesn't want people, or even politicians, 
discussing  the secret TPP, before it's done signed and it's too late to 
string up obama to stop it.
So it's not something your talking head, mainstream news  even touches on.

Yet it will affect every part of your life, including the ability to post on 
the internet, or even have access to.

...Once you have to use your government approved ID to sign on or send a 
message, so we can know where to find you.
Your days of being an anonymous idiot will be done, as they won't need you 
anymore.

Back to alt.astronomy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-19 13:52 -0500
  Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-19 19:53 +0000
    Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-10-19 15:57 -0700
      Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-20 01:01 +0000
        Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2015-10-19 20:24 -0700
    Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-19 19:53 -0400
      Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-19 20:22 -0400
      Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-20 00:58 +0000
      Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-20 03:56 -0500
        Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-20 10:01 -0400
          Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-20 20:41 -0500
            Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-21 09:30 -0400
              Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-21 09:18 -0500
                Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-21 10:59 -0400
              Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 04:13 -0500
                Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-22 10:06 -0400
                Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-22 15:42 -0500
                Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 19:07 -0500
                Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-22 21:34 -0400
                Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 04:29 -0500
                Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-23 08:45 -0400
                Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 18:44 -0500
            Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-21 11:35 -0400
              Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-21 20:59 -0400
                Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 04:13 -0500
                Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-22 10:11 -0400
                Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-22 15:51 -0500
                Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-22 17:33 -0400
                Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-22 23:20 -0400
                Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-23 05:15 -0400
                Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-23 10:29 -0400
                Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-23 11:05 -0500
                Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-23 16:18 -0400
                Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-23 23:49 +0100
                Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-10-23 19:35 -0400
                Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 18:44 -0500
                Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-24 10:42 -0500
                Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-10-24 17:26 +0100
                Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-24 21:23 -0500
                Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-25 06:35 -0500
                Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-25 11:54 -0500
                Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-25 14:47 -0500
                Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-25 20:52 -0500
                Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-26 15:37 -0500
                Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-10-27 15:50 -0500
                Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-23 15:43 -0400
                Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-22 23:19 -0400
                Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 04:29 -0500
                Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-10-23 10:32 -0400
                Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-22 21:47 -0400
              Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-10-22 04:13 -0500
                Re: 'US not interested in winning War on Terror' - Hamid Karzai Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-10-22 21:39 -0400

csiph-web