Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.crypt |
| Subject | Re: Introduction me |
| Date | 2015-10-14 14:54 -0700 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <mvmiv7$oqq$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <9abd4bb5-a4a2-4504-96e5-dba3ac39cdc6@googlegroups.com> <mvjtg0$tjc$1@speranza.aioe.org> <mvk0hh$mf0$1@dont-email.me> |
> "William Unruh" wrote in message news:mvk0hh$mf0$1@dont-email.me... > > On 2015-10-13, Chris M. Thomasson <nospam@nospam.nospam> wrote: > > wrote in message > > news:9abd4bb5-a4a2-4504-96e5-dba3ac39cdc6@googlegroups.com... [...] > > WRT ASCII, I basically had to make the online version of my cipher > > convert a > > plaintext into a series of > > hexbytes in ASCII so that a user would not get a bunch of trash in the > > ciphertext: > > > > http://funwithfractals.atspace.cc/ffe > > > > IMHO, I think encrypting the plaintext into a ciphertext of hexbytes wrt > > the > > online version is a good thing > > because a user can easily take a look at every byte of the ciphertext. > And why does the user waht to look at any byte of the ciphertext? > Sounds like a pretty pointless exercise. That is fair enough William. I can easily turn off the hexbyte conversion process, but then the ciphertext will be a bunch of “gobbledygook” that is not going to be pleasing to the eye of somebody who wants to visually examine it. What if a user wants to examine the ciphertext directly without having to look at a bunch of random symbols and non-printable characters directly in the webpage? Ahhh! I should make this an option, perhaps via checkbox that will allow a user to see the hexbytes if they want to. FWIW, I converted the ciphertext into hexbytes in ASCII because I liked the way Richard Heathfield presented his ciphertext challenges to this group. It worked great! What do you think about using a checkbox that allows a user to generate ASCII hexbytes or raw output dumped into the ciphertext textarea? Thanks. :^)
Back to sci.crypt | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Introduction me eaglesondouglas@gmail.com - 2015-10-12 10:26 -0700
Re: Introduction me Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2015-10-12 17:45 +0000
Re: Introduction me eaglesondouglas@gmail.com - 2015-10-13 08:28 -0700
Re: Introduction me William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2015-10-13 16:09 +0000
Re: Introduction me Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2015-10-13 16:19 +0000
Re: Introduction me William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2015-10-12 17:46 +0000
Re: Introduction me Karl-Uwe Frank <karl.frank@freecx.co.uk> - 2015-10-12 21:19 +0200
Re: Introduction me Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2015-10-12 20:24 +0000
Re: Introduction me Johan Wevers <johanw@vulcan.xs4all.nl> - 2015-10-13 10:08 +0200
Re: Introduction me Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2015-10-13 16:20 +0000
Re: Introduction me Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2015-10-13 16:24 +0000
Re: Introduction me Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2015-10-14 16:20 +0200
Re: Introduction me Ribeiro Alvo <ribeiroalvo@gmail.com> - 2015-10-13 03:58 -0700
Re: Introduction me "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2015-10-13 14:35 -0700
Re: Introduction me William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2015-10-13 22:28 +0000
Re: Introduction me "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2015-10-14 14:54 -0700
Re: Introduction me Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2015-10-14 22:02 +0000
Re: Introduction me gordonb.loovx@burditt.org (Gordon Burditt) - 2015-10-15 02:39 -0500
Re: Introduction me William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2015-10-15 08:00 +0000
Re: Introduction me Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-10-15 13:14 +0100
Re: Introduction me "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2015-10-15 12:13 -0700
Re: Introduction me "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2015-10-15 12:35 -0700
Re: Introduction me Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2015-10-15 22:34 +0000
Re: Introduction me "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2015-10-16 01:15 -0700
Re: Introduction me William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2015-10-16 18:02 +0000
Re: Introduction me wizzofozz <oscxxxxxxxaas@gmail.com> - 2015-10-16 20:30 +0200
Re: Introduction me Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2015-10-16 20:09 +0000
Re: Introduction me "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2015-10-19 14:45 -0700
Re: Introduction me William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2015-10-15 23:16 +0000
Re: Introduction me William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2015-10-14 22:48 +0000
Re: Introduction me eaglesondouglas@gmail.com - 2015-10-14 08:03 -0700
Re: Introduction me omnilobe@gmail.com - 2015-10-14 10:23 -0700
Re: Introduction me William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2015-10-14 17:34 +0000
Re: Introduction me eaglesondouglas@gmail.com - 2015-10-15 07:21 -0700
Re: Introduction me Jeffrey Goldberg <nobody@goldmark.org> - 2015-10-18 12:56 -0500
Re: Introduction me MM <mrvmurray@gmail.com> - 2015-10-18 11:44 -0700
Re: Introduction me rpw3@rpw3.org (Rob Warnock) - 2015-10-18 18:57 +0000
Re: Introduction me Jeffrey Goldberg <nobody@goldmark.org> - 2015-10-19 17:52 -0500
csiph-web