Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #524307
| From | gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Is Glass a Liquid? |
| Date | 2015-10-02 17:07 -0500 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <mumv82$jeh$2@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <oqadncvdkKIiVpDLnZ2dnUU7-aEAAAAA@giganews.com> <jsmPx.8729$IO6.8583@fx07.iad> <f29d9a20-c9cb-493f-86a6-e2ed0f261de8@googlegroups.com> <6398d6fe-5517-48b8-befc-e38bf6d9b568@googlegroups.com> |
On 10/2/2015 1:55 AM, Angelo wrote: > Il giorno venerdì 2 ottobre 2015 07:39:05 UTC+2, pnal...@gmail.com ha > scritto: >> On Thursday, October 1, 2015 at 8:01:39 PM UTC-7, benj wrote: >> > A large lens in a refracting telescope offers a much more sensitive > probe: "In very large apertures, there is also a problem of lens > sagging, a result of gravity deforming glass. Since a lens can only > be held in place by its edge, the center of a large lens sags due to > gravity, distorting the images it produces. The largest practical > lens size in a refracting telescope is around 1 meter (39 in)." > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refracting_telescope#Technical_considerations > > Perhaps this fact contributed in part to the abandonment of large > refractors (gravity deforming lenses). > but that is not flow. that is just sag, the mounts sag too, and they are steel. large refractors cost to much to build the lens, and have a chance it will fracture. Refractors you can spin in an oven and get the surface close, cheaper you still have sag problems with the large refractors > regards Angelo >
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Is Glass a Liquid? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 19:11 -0500
no, and yes noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 18:28 -0700
Re: Is Glass a Liquid? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-10-02 01:19 +0000
Re: Is Glass a Liquid? benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-10-01 23:01 -0400
Re: Is Glass a Liquid? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-10-01 22:38 -0700
Re: Is Glass a Liquid? Angelo <patrizio.pan-2002@libero.it> - 2015-10-01 23:55 -0700
Re: Is Glass a Liquid? john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 06:33 -0700
Re: Is Glass a Liquid? Angelo <patrizio.pan-2002@libero.it> - 2015-10-02 07:14 -0700
Re: Is Glass a Liquid? benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 12:19 -0400
Re: Is Glass a Liquid? Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 15:43 -0700
Re: Is Glass a Liquid? "Le Nymster" <invalid@example.com> - 2015-10-02 19:05 -0700
Re: Is Glass a Liquid? Angelo <patrizio.pan-2002@libero.it> - 2015-10-02 19:41 -0700
Re: Is Glass a Liquid? benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-10-03 03:05 -0400
Re: Is Glass a Liquid? gilber34 <fafa@invalid.com> - 2015-10-02 17:07 -0500
Re: Is Glass a Liquid? Angelo <patrizio.pan-2002@libero.it> - 2015-10-02 16:56 -0700
Re: Is Glass a Liquid? Helmut Wabnig <hwabnig@.- --- -.dotat> - 2015-10-02 08:34 +0200
Re: Is Glass a Liquid? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 10:48 -0700
Re: Is Glass a Liquid? Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2015-10-02 13:25 -0700
Re: Is Glass a Liquid? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 15:27 -0700
Re: Is Glass a Liquid? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 13:30 -0700
Re: Is Glass a Liquid? Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2015-10-02 14:31 -0700
Re: Is Glass a Liquid? benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-10-03 03:19 -0400
Re: Is Glass a Liquid? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-10-03 10:12 -0700
Re: Is Glass a Liquid? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-10-03 21:17 -0700
Re: Is Glass a Liquid? "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-10-02 14:43 -0700
csiph-web