Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #365567
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Newton not entirely right |
| Date | 2015-09-28 11:09 -0500 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <mubooe$44b$2@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <a3e5b94c-79e7-40e3-bae5-014a28b35f30@googlegroups.com> |
On 9/28/2015 1:26 AM, Peter Riedt wrote: > > Newton's law of universal gravitation is incomplete. It considers gravity a force of attraction > but it does not account for celestial bodies that cannot complete the descent to their primary. > I have no idea what you're talking about here, Peter. Orbiting bodies would not follow ellipses if they weren't attracted. They would travel in straight lines. Attraction doesn't require that the two bodies end up in contact. What makes you think they would? -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Newton not entirely right Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-09-27 23:26 -0700
Re: Newton not entirely right Dirk Van de moortel <dirkvandemoortel@hotspam.not> - 2015-09-28 16:00 +0200
Re: Newton not entirely right kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-28 11:49 -0400
Re: Newton not entirely right mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2015-09-29 01:13 -0700
Re: Newton not entirely right kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-29 14:48 -0400
Re: Newton not entirely right pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-09-29 13:19 -0700
Re: Newton not entirely right kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-29 16:56 -0400
Re: Newton not entirely right pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-09-29 14:06 -0700
Re: Newton not entirely right kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-29 17:43 -0400
Re: Newton not entirely right Kent Beeler <kenbee@jefffast.au> - 2015-09-29 21:59 +0000
Re: Newton not entirely right pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-09-29 15:39 -0700
Re: Newton not entirely right kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-29 19:44 -0400
Re: Newton not entirely right pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-09-29 19:37 -0700
Re: Newton not entirely right kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-30 00:27 -0400
Re: Newton not entirely right pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-09-29 21:42 -0700
Re: Newton not entirely right kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-30 02:57 -0400
Re: Newton not entirely right pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-09-29 21:44 -0700
Re: Newton not entirely right kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-30 02:58 -0400
Re: Newton not entirely right Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-30 07:56 -0500
Re: Newton not entirely right Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-30 07:32 -0500
Re: Newton not entirely right mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2015-09-29 22:45 -0700
Re: Newton not entirely right Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-28 11:09 -0500
Re: Newton not entirely right Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-09-28 18:32 -0700
Re: Newton not entirely right kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-09-28 21:57 -0400
Re: Newton not entirely right Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-09-28 19:39 -0700
Re: Newton not entirely right Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-28 20:10 -0700
Re: Newton not entirely right Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-09-29 07:07 +0200
Re: Newton not entirely right Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-09-28 22:51 -0700
Re: Newton not entirely right Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-09-29 08:20 +0200
Re: Newton not entirely right Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-09-29 16:32 +1000
Re: Newton not entirely right Helmut Wabnig <hwabnig@.- --- -.dotat> - 2015-09-29 09:51 +0200
Re: Newton not entirely right Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-09-29 07:38 -0500
csiph-web