Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.raspberry-pi > #9578
| From | "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.raspberry-pi |
| Subject | Re: A new (and better?) kid on the block? |
| Date | 2015-09-08 18:23 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <msn5f9$2qa$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <msh8kn$f8v$1@dont-email.me> <mshq3j$jbd$1@dont-email.me> <mshshk$spq$1@dont-email.me> <slrnmusbro.8i7.spamtrap42@one.localnet> <msn1kh$g86$1@dont-email.me> |
"Torfinn Ingolfsen" <tingo@home.no> wrote in message news:msn1kh$g86$1@dont-email.me... > On 09/08/2015 02:44, Robert Riches wrote: >> >> Wikipedia has comparison tables for certain microprocessors: >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Intel_processors >> >> A similar comparison table for fruit Pi machines would seem to be >> as appropriate. >> > > There is this at least: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_single-board_computers IME those large Wikipedia comparison tables have some shortcomings: 1. They are too comprehensive making it difficult to focus on the items you want to see. 2. They are not database driven, making it impossible to reduce the sizes of the tables by selecting the attributes you want to see. The Specifications table at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raspberry_Pi#Specifications is much better. In fact it's better than any I have seen elsewhere even on raspberrypi.org. James
Back to comp.sys.raspberry-pi | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
A new (and better?) kid on the block? "gareth" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2015-09-06 12:14 +0100
Re: A new (and better?) kid on the block? "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 12:40 +0100
Re: A new (and better?) kid on the block? "gareth" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2015-09-06 17:38 +0100
Re: A new (and better?) kid on the block? Rob Morley <nospam@ntlworld.com> - 2015-09-06 18:13 +0100
Re: A new (and better?) kid on the block? Andy Burns <usenet.feb2014@adslpipe.co.uk> - 2015-09-06 18:27 +0100
Re: A new (and better?) kid on the block? "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 18:20 +0100
Re: A new (and better?) kid on the block? Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2015-09-08 00:44 +0000
Re: A new (and better?) kid on the block? Torfinn Ingolfsen <tingo@home.no> - 2015-09-08 18:18 +0200
Re: A new (and better?) kid on the block? "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2015-09-08 18:23 +0100
Re: A new (and better?) kid on the block? druck <news@druck.org.uk> - 2015-09-13 12:37 +0100
Re: A new (and better?) kid on the block? Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-09-13 11:39 -0400
Re: A new (and better?) kid on the block? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 11:45 -0400
Re: A new (and better?) kid on the block? Dom <domafp@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2015-09-13 17:45 +0100
csiph-web