Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.astronomy > #275006

Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero

From "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
Newsgroups alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, sci.physics
Subject Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero
Date 2015-09-05 08:00 -0400
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <msele8$loe$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <YuidnTczJLcth3fInZ2dnUU7-YednZ2d@giganews.com> <msdb4v$3bn$1@dont-email.me> <2fd01384-c558-42e3-a944-f8e6b33d4998@googlegroups.com> <qICdnak_94cuAXfInZ2dnUU7-TGdnZ2d@giganews.com>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw



Rocky wrote:
> <edrhodes@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:2fd01384-c558-42e3-a944-f8e6b33d4998@googlegroups.com...
> On Friday, September 4, 2015 at 7:59:10 PM UTC-4, Bast wrote:
>> Rocky wrote:
>>> Ok, I've recently been saying that buildings at Ground Zero floated
>>> away after being nuked but I didn't use the link at the very end of
>>> this post until now.
>>>
>>> And keep in mind if there was absolutely no radiation recorded at
>>> Ground Zero then that is a smoking gun too because there is radiation
>>> everywhere. <G>
>>>
>>> And don't give me any seismic readings bullshit because buildings
>>> don't just shake and shake and shake at a consistent rate if a tripod
>>> was bumped.  Plus a bumped tripod does not explain why WCBS recorded a
>>> simultaneous EMP and why people started running at the exact same
>>> event.  <G>
>>> And to this very date NIST has never used their Cartoon Physics to
>>> explain why so much at the very bottom of the Twin Towers were left
>>> standing and not just standing but standing with survivors.  <G>
>>>
>>> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>>>
>>> And then why are their so many inconsistencies between real jets and
>>> the Phantom Flight 175?
>>>
>>> http://911planeshoax.com
>>>
>>>
>>> Steve Grage & James Easton's PHYSICS 9/11 - THE NO PLANES MOVIE
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p1D1C94eE8U
>>>
>>> Rocky
>>>
>>> Now for the link that shows Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero
>>> http://smg.photobucket.com/user/youricarma/media/NineOneOne/GJS-WTC46.jpg.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> You should find this interesting
>> http://www.britannica.com/technology/neutron-bomb
>
> No he wouldn't. Rocky tried to suggest the "deep underground nukes" were
> "neutron" bombs until it was pointed out to him that "neutron bombs"
> don't "vaporize" buildings, they cause minimum building damage and
> mostly kill people with heavy dosages of radiation.
>
> =======
>
> Wrong Ediot because her link also talks about "clean" nukes.
>
> Rocky




Exactly.
They are often low yield, and very controllable.
Most of the radiation would be contained in the building dust.

NOTE: I a not saying this was used on 9/11, but I will consider it a 
possibility/hypothesis until someone can prove it wrong.

...And proving it wrong requires facts,....not just saying it's "kookdom" or 
"kooktalk". 

Back to alt.astronomy | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-04 17:29 -0500
  Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero burfordtjustice <burford@uk.mo> - 2015-09-04 18:42 -0400
    Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-04 18:22 -0500
      Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero burfordtjustice <burford@uk.mo> - 2015-09-05 07:22 -0400
  Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-04 19:59 -0400
    Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-05 02:40 -0500
      Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-05 08:00 -0400
      Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-05 10:48 -0500
        Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-05 18:39 +0100
          Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero  (Link for Tony) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 03:28 -0500
            Re: Rocky imagines nukes yet again jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 16:53 +0000
            Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero (Link for Tony) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-06 20:54 +0100
              Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero (Tony is still an idiot) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 15:10 -0500
                Re: Rocky the stalker raves on jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 21:03 +0000
                Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero (Tony is still an idiot) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-06 23:02 +0100
                Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero (Tony is still a big idiot) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 17:04 -0500
                Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero (Tony is still a big idiot) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-07 18:46 +0100
                Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero (Tony is still a big idiot) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 12:56 -0500
                Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero (Tony is still a big idiot) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-07 20:04 +0100
            Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero (Michael gives me a laugh) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 17:18 -0500
            Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero  (Link for Tony) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-07 03:21 +0200
        Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero (answers 4 d Ediot) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 09:19 -0500
          Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero (answers 4 d Ediot & dmaster) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 17:16 -0500
  Re: Rocky continues crazy raving jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-05 00:08 +0000
    Re: Rocky continues crazy raving "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-05 08:11 -0400
      Re: Rocky continues crazy raving jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-05 18:40 +0000
        Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 02:41 -0500
          Re: Rocky thinks cameas are seismographs jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 16:55 +0000
        Re: Rocky continues crazy raving "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-06 11:43 -0400
          Re: Rocky continues crazy raving "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 10:58 -0500
            Re: Rocky's one wing delusion jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 16:59 +0000
              Re: Rocky's one wing delusion "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 14:58 -0500
          Re: Rocky continues crazy raving "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-06 11:17 -0500
            Re: Rocky hammers K the Krazy "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 11:39 -0500
              Re: Rocky spews more delusions jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 17:04 +0000
              Re: Rocky hammers the Ediot "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 13:18 -0500
                Re: Rocky raves against reality again jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 18:41 +0000
                Re: Rocky hammers jimp again "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 14:29 -0500
                Re: Rocky doesn't get it jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-06 21:06 +0000
                Re: Rocky will run away from the TRUTH. Yes, again. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-07 03:00 +0200
                Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero (k kaught in more lies) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 17:43 -0500
          Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 10:08 -0500
    Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-05 10:25 -0500
      Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-05 18:39 +0100
      Re: Post Nuke Photos of Ground Zero Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-05 19:37 +0200
      Re: Rocky's delusions jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-05 18:45 +0000

csiph-web