Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence

From	Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com>
Newsgroups	alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, sci.physics
Subject	Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence
Date	2015-08-24 22:11 +0100
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<mrg17b$llc$3@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	(4 earlier) <jd2dnesHusJZj0fInZ2dnUU7-audnZ2d@giganews.com> <oihpac-qv4.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <oJGdnROGGOLJgEfInZ2dnUU7-UudnZ2d@giganews.com> <mrdajl$hn4$7@dont-email.me> <3OCdnb-u2vCRFkfInZ2dnUU7-d-dnZ2d@giganews.com>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 24/08/2015 04:09, Rocky wrote:
> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message
> news:mrdajl$hn4$7@dont-email.me...
>> On 23/08/2015 20:23, Rocky wrote:
>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
>>> news:oihpac-qv4.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> For the initial ground shaking the seismic readings are suspect but for
>>>>> the
>>>>> alleged collapse of a 110 story building the seismic readings prove
>>>>> only
>>>>> a
>>>>> very small part of them crashed to the ground and in reality that
>>>>> reading
>>>>> could be too high instead of way too low.
>>>>
>>>> All the seismic readings all over the planet are totally consistant
>>>> with four airplane crashes and two building collapses, kook.
>>>
>>> And yet they are not consistent with videos taken at Ground Zero that
>>> show
>>> the North Tower shaking like mad about 12 seconds before it was
>>> vaporized?
>>> Weird.
>>>
>>
>> What readings would you expect from the TT crashing to the ground?
>
> WTF?  Why did you move the goalpost?
>
> I was talking about the seismic readings before the North Tower started to
> fall when it shook for a few seconds and then nothing for 12 seconds and
> then you change the subject to after the TT landed.  Please stay on the
> subject you clown.

So are you trying to tell us that a shaking building would give no 
readings, how quaint.

>
> Here, this video will help you see what I'm talking about that the seismic
> readings never recorded and yet people talked about the ground shaking
> before the North Tower was vaporized at a level that is comparable to a 5.5
> and not a 2.3.
>
> 9/11 WTC North Tower collapse by Etienne Sauret. Visible shaking 12 seconds
> before collapse
>   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CM88xJX5FsA
>
> And there is something else strange in that video.  The destruction stays in
> one place while the top of the towers comes down so the top part wasn't
> crushing the bottom part of the building the top part was really crushing
> itself first so where did all the weight come from to crush the bottom of
> the Twin Towers?  And then why didn't it end up at the base of the Twin
> Towers?  <G>
>

Oh I know the answer to that, the weight came from the parts of the 
building above.

>>> And do not forget since the truth seekers can prove NIST lied and lied
>>> and
>>> lied and lied why should we believe any government agency about 9/11?
>>> See:
>>>
>>> The playlist for the Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence is:
>>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvCuMULutHs&list=PLm5UJ3igmxaIBJw8yvK1-a9H_11kBDS8W
>
> Rocky sheeple
>
>


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

Thread

NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 09:23 -0500
  Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 09:29 -0500
    Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 18:03 +0100
      Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 13:38 -0500
        Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 14:08 -0500
          Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 14:33 -0500
            Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-23 14:42 -0500
            Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 13:51 -0700
              Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 16:05 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 15:13 -0700
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 17:54 -0500
          Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-22 15:39 -0500
            Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-24 17:24 -0500
              Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-24 22:46 +0000
              Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-25 14:12 -0500
                Re: Rocky's delusions jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-25 21:45 +0000
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-26 10:54 +0200
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Waiting for Kidd the LIAR to finish what he started ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-26 16:57 -0500
        Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 14:23 -0500
          Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 21:33 +0100
            Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 22:09 -0500
              Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-24 22:11 +0100
          Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 04:09 -0500
        Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 21:33 +0100
    Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 20:49 +0200
      Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 17:34 -0500
        Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 02:05 +0200
    Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 13:54 -0500
      Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 13:39 -0700
        Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 16:17 -0500
          Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 15:08 -0700
            Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 18:00 -0500
          Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 23:16 +0100
          Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 04:04 -0500
        Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 04:03 -0500
      Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 23:42 +0200
        Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 17:12 -0500
          Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 01:21 +0200
        Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-24 13:28 -0400
          Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 12:45 -0500
            Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 17:54 +0000
          Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-25 05:41 +0200
            Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-25 11:05 -0400
              Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-25 20:53 +0200
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-25 15:51 -0400
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-26 03:33 +0200
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-26 07:47 -0400
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (FNN stupid) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-26 08:34 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (FNN stupid) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-26 09:55 -0400
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-26 09:36 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-26 11:00 -0400
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-26 15:43 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-26 16:52 -0400
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 14:14 -0700
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 17:00 +0000
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 17:12 -0400
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 21:24 +0000
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 17:52 -0400
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 22:15 +0000
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 19:19 -0400
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-26 23:52 +0000
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-27 04:12 -0400
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 17:04 +0000
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-27 13:11 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Note 4 jim) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 09:25 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Note 4 jim) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 17:05 +0000
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Note 4 jim) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-27 12:45 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-26 18:29 -0400
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-26 19:29 -0400
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-27 09:48 -0400
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (NORAD lied) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 09:19 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (NORAD lied) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-27 10:34 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 16:26 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 21:40 +0000
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence (Fakery is stupid) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 04:47 +0200
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (Fakery is stupid) benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-08-26 13:01 -0400
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence  (FNN stupid) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-26 19:08 +0200
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 je suis) je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-27 14:28 -0700
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 je suis) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 16:42 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 je suis) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 14:54 -0700
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 %) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 17:04 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 %) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 15:13 -0700
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 %) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 23:05 +0000
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 je suis) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 21:51 +0000
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( 2 je suis) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-28 06:11 +0200
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( proving FNN is worthlesss) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 08:55 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( proving FNN is worthlesss) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-28 19:02 +0200
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence ( proving FNN is worthlesss) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 17:58 +0000
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-26 22:29 +0200
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-26 16:42 -0400
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-27 05:43 +0200
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-25 16:10 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-25 20:10 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-26 19:27 +0200
    Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 14:05 -0500
      Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 15:12 -0500
        Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 14:35 -0700
          Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 21:03 -0500
            Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 19:09 -0700
              Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 21:36 -0500
                Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 07:02 +0200
            Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 02:37 +0000
        Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 23:15 +0100
          Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-24 22:11 +0100
  Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 13:57 -0500
    Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 13:35 -0700
      Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 15:57 -0500
      Re: NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 04:05 -0500

csiph-web