Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.atheism > #1965015
| From | MarkA <someone@somewhere.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.atheism |
| Subject | Re: Secular case against abortion |
| Date | 2015-08-20 16:49 +0000 |
| Organization | NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $23.95 |
| Message-ID | <mr50e531id2@news7.newsguy.com> (permalink) |
| References | <mqc4vj$vot$1@dont-email.me> <e5d71d91-4e81-407c-bebe-5cf913ff46c0@googlegroups.com> <mqmh3m$c8d$4@dont-email.me> <pan.2015.08.19.19.56.40@somewhere.invalid> <mr2rju$22o$3@dont-email.me> |
On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 14:16:18 -0700, Rudy Canoza wrote: > On 8/19/2015 12:57 PM, MarkA wrote: >> On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 22:03:21 -0700, Rudy Canoza wrote: >> >>> On 8/14/2015 2:40 PM, Paul wrote: >>>> So getting back to the original point -- there is no rational secular >>>> case against abortion. >>> >>> Of course there is. The developing baby is a person. Killing it is >>> murder. Murder is wrong. >>> >>> Case closed. >> >> The developing baby is threatening the life and health of the woman. > > No, it isn't, and that's not the reason the vast majority of women get > abortions, even if they're happy enough to have that as a > rationalization. It's for convenience. It must be wonderful to have so many interesting things about the world yet to learn. Too bad that you will almost certainly fail to learn any of them. -- MarkA I don't mind if people want to live in an alternate reality, as long as they don't try to govern in this one.
Back to alt.atheism | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Secular case against abortion Paul <papa_fox@cybertown.com> - 2015-08-14 14:40 -0700
Re: Secular case against abortion Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 01:19 -0400
Re: Secular case against abortion Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 01:27 -0400
Re: Secular case against abortion Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 01:51 -0400
Re: Secular case against abortion Olrik <olrik666@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 02:01 -0400
Re: Secular case against abortion Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-08-15 05:17 -0700
Re: Secular case against abortion "W*T*S*." <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2015-08-15 01:08 -0500
Re: Secular case against abortion "W.TS." <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2015-08-15 02:51 -0500
Re: Secular case against abortion Planet Visitor II <nappy@nosuchserver.com> - 2015-08-15 23:41 -0400
Re: Secular case against abortion "W.TS." <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2015-08-15 01:04 -0500
Re: Secular case against abortion "W.TS." <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2015-08-15 02:49 -0500
Re: Secular case against abortion Christopher A. Lee <c.lee@fairpoint.net> - 2015-08-15 06:40 -0500
Re: Secular case against abortion Paul <papa_fox@cybertown.com> - 2015-08-15 14:45 -0700
Re: Secular case against abortion MarkA <someone@somewhere.invalid> - 2015-08-18 21:45 +0000
Re: Secular case against abortion Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-08-18 21:53 -0700
Re: Secular case against abortion "W.TS." <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2015-08-15 01:01 -0500
Re: Secular case against abortion "W.TS." <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2015-08-15 02:48 -0500
Re: Secular case against abortion Carl Kaufmann <cwkaufmann@cox.net> - 2015-08-15 03:16 -0400
Re: Secular case against abortion "W.TS." <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2015-08-15 02:44 -0500
Re: Secular case against abortion MarkA <someone@somewhere.invalid> - 2015-08-19 19:59 +0000
Re: Secular case against abortion "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-08-15 15:14 +0100
Re: Secular case against abortion "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-08-16 15:00 +0100
Re: Secular case against abortion Paul <papa_fox@cybertown.com> - 2015-08-15 14:42 -0700
Re: Secular case against abortion MarkA <someone@somewhere.invalid> - 2015-08-19 19:57 +0000
Re: Secular case against abortion MarkA <someone@somewhere.invalid> - 2015-08-20 16:49 +0000
csiph-web